[I've been
contemplating something for about a week. It seems to me that people are now
being divided into thirds by way of chipping away at humanity. We have seen two
blatant groups since about June 2020. One third of humanity is pretty much
gone. They've already had AI put into their bodies (with what has been seen as
permission) and they are destined for autoimmune dis-eases, mad cow dis-ease,
and other engineered issues. It is not the end for them, but if they couldn't
get out from under the control before all of these things were put into them
(and their spirit is being targeted now)1, then it's going to be
harder for them after having a year of a questionable swab up their noses (when
not testing for a virus that has never been isolated with a non-test) and having
been injected with one or more eagerly offered c shots. If these mask-wearing
believers wouldn't let people like me help them before, then they're not going
to accept support easily now. If they
sought an experimental pharmaceutical when they were well, then when they are
physically feeling very poorly and not capable of helping themselves, they will
again trust that which placed their health in jeopardy (entity controlled Western
Medicine)2, expecting to feel well.
The
second group is made up of the people who are aware of what's going on.
They're grounded. They're not in fear. They don't react to every single little
soundbite they hear. They will not take the c shot no matter what, and they do
not give permission for any Satanist, entity, etc. to have any kind of power
over them. When they become informed
that the 1% dELETE are up to nefarious implementations, such as GMOed "bio"-probiotics
to be sprayed on all food items3 (for surveillance of humans),
dangerous fake meat to phase out all meat consumption,4 (though those
in this group may not be for slaughtering animals), and curriculums in public
schools to insure separation and an “us against them” mentality in humans for
other humans,5 they have mental, spiritual, physical, or a
combination of the three countermeasures in response.
The
third group that's just now emerging (in this second year of the Wag the Dog
Psy-op) is a break off from the second group. They have been able to stand
stronger in the attack for their MultiSelves in the past, but are now easily pushed into
fear with certain sound bites. Whether it's, "You better have the c shot
or you will lose your job," or "Don't be around people who've had the
c shot, because they are transmitting engineered viruses and goodness knows
what else from the Satanists," or "There is no safe food," they
are being manipulated. They are desperate. In scanning possibilities, they're unable
to come up with non-violent countermeasures.
Why
do you think our group was divided? They can get this new third group to fear
those who have had the c shot and that is a bonus for them. This supports their
favorite past-time of pitting human against human. The 1 % dELETE rally humans
this way for the same kind of "fun" our average damonic humans
enjoy when pitting rooster against rooster, dog against dog, and the like. They're trying to get you to where you will
look at a human and say, "You're trying to hurt me." Then, maybe you
will want to go into war against that human. Couple this with what we already
know about the first group, that they have been programmed to eye people who
haven't had the c shot, thinking, You're going to make me sick! Do you think it's possible that maybe the
Satanists are trying to get that group to go against those who haven't had the
c shot? If the third group is as easily manipulated as the first group, there
will be even less standing against what may be coming. If you want to fight a
human, you're playing into their hand!
This
message is for you if you are in that third group. Get off social media. (I
assume you're already not listening to the news.) Stop watching videos by doctors6 who mean well but are supporting you in spiraling downward in fear. If
you can't handle listening to things, don't listen to them. Read my book and
perform the Violet Cubes of Light and Pinky-rose exercises. Vocalize out loud that you vote no on "this" practice and "that" legislation, and
that you do not give your permission for the
military-science-government-human-non-human factions to use weapons against
you. Demand that they be held for trial in a higher spiritual court if they
dare to harm you stealthily or otherwise. Know the truth, but don’t fear it. If
information rattles you, then walk away from it for now. Breath.
Do high-frequency work before revisiting it.
The
1% dELETE are pulling out all the stops because they are terrified that they
can’t get humanity in enough fear to block the light that is presently overwhelming
3D Earth. Think of the witch in The
Wizard of Oz, "Help me. I’m melting, " for an idea of why they are
bombarding us with end times movies and scripts. (Yes, Black Star and other
celestial goings-on may be realities, but still no reason for us to spiral in
fear as if the end of a current experience is the focus.)
Hold
your Center!
They
have weaponized fear.
AI
is coming for you if you don't]
1The imposter ray is
artificial intelligence making a newly departed “soul” believe it is “The White
Light,” thus entrapping it in a perpetual cycle of imprisonment in its version
of 3D Earth.
See my book Interdimensional
Disturbances Access Denied for more information on entities, the successive
human, and the imposter ray.
https://www.lulu.com/en/us/shop/paget-anne-of-essendon-/interdimensional-disturbances-access-denied/paperback/product-kjjp5n.html?page=1&pageSize=4
2If a modality does
not have AI, Draco Reptilian, Satanic humans, and other damonic entity
support, it is not pedaled to the masses.
Western Medicine has been slowly vamped since at least 1870 (by the
timeline we have been taught) to be the weapon against humanity that it is in
2021.
3The 1% dELETE, the
criminals-that-believe-they-be, will always use “climate change” in a smoke and
mirrors sort of way to derail you from your thoughts questioning safety. If there’s a reason for it for the whole
world, then little matters such as safety can be overlooked. And let’s face
it. If they get away with this, what other
bot can they get into your system? Can
it impulse you to kill or to simply die yourself? Is it a way to transmit what
one group of humanity is “deficient in,” because they refuse the c shot?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/g0I5hMxW3s7f/?fbclid=IwAR3UaEZMaJsatVmcklQVdfxY6bP9PpNAFhbO0_og2N7lyA01NDLT-1AmhU8
4Understand that no
lifestream is important to the 1% dELETE.
They strive for self-gain and don’t care who or what is destroyed. They do not want to establish a “sanctuary”
for any other than themselves. https://www.bitchute.com/video/BKQawCUMn3JN/
5It is not simply a
thing occurring in NY. It is supposedly
occurring all over the US; though, Texas has allegedly stopped it. Students are
taught to see the outsides of a person, not the insides. I once worked with a man for four years
before someone brought it to my attention that he was black. Now it will become a thing kids are taught to
notice.
https://www.theblaze.com/news/buffalo-schools-woke-curriculum-white-supremacy
6 https://www.bitchute.com/video/I63bFvfSXe38/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dFO3mCIB1jUO/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzQ4uEwCYwA&t=31907s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp3lo88_ptQ&t=674s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pg5vnYtxaE4
https://tapnewswire.com/2021/05/self-spreading-vaccines-are-no-myth-its-hard-science-johns-hopkins-confirmed-them-covid-genocide-is-here/
Thanks Jennifer:
A COMMENT ON ENGINEERED VIRUSES: "Viral Vector Shedding
Vector shedding is the release of virus-based gene therapy products from the patient through one or all of the following routes: excreta (feces), secreta (urine, saliva, nasopharyngeal fluids, etc.), and skin (pustule, sores, wounds)1
Biodistribution
Shedding is distinct from biodistribution, which refers to the spread of vector DNA within the patient’s body after administration, and its localization and persistence in tissues, body fluids, or organs.
Vector Shedding
Shedding, which refers to how a product is excreted or released from the patient’s body, may be observed as a result of biodistribution.
Viral vectors are currently the preferred method of delivery for gene therapies, compared with non-viral delivery systems.
Approximately 70% of ongoing gene therapy clinical trials for rare genetic diseases utilize viral vectors.
100%
Currently, all of the gene therapies approved by the FDA or EMA are viral-based gene therapy products.
Replication Capabilities of Viral Vectors
Replication-deficient viral vectors
Replication-deficient viral vectors are engineered to be devoid of most of the viral sequences and hence, lack the genetic information for replication; however, they do retain the capacity for introducing genes of interest into target cells.
Some wild-type viruses like adeno-associated virus (AAV) are naturally replication deficient and need
co-infection with other helper viruses to be able to replicate."
" Replication-competent viral vectors retain characteristics of the parent virus that enable them to multiply.
These viruses are currently most often being applied in cancer therapy.
A few examples include herpes simplex virus (HSV), reovirus, and adenovirus.
Safety concerns associated with vector shedding is extremely low for replication-deficient viral vectors.
Shedding of replication-deficient viral vectors is expected to be low, of a limited duration, and associated with a lower potential for release as infectious viruses.
While it is unknown whether limited exposure to a replication-deficient vector is sufficient to generate an antibody response,
--> there is a potential risk of seroconversion* in people who come into contact with patients dosed with a gene therapy, which could have future implications.
In exposed individuals, it could limit the possibility of future use of a gene therapy containing the same vector.
--> In the event of exposure in an antibody-negative mother, there may be the subsequent risk of future seropositive† pregnancies17 <--
Gene Therapy Viral Vector
Alipogene tiparvovec* Replication-deficient AAV119
Autologous CD34+ cells encoding the human ADA cDNA sequence† Replication-deficient ɣ-retroviral vector20
Axicabtagene ciloleucel‡ Replication-deficient ɣ-retroviral vector21
Gendicine Replication-deficient adenovirus22
Onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi Replication-deficient AAV923,24
Tisagenlecleucel§ Replication-deficient lentiviral vector25
Voretigene neparvovec-rzyl¶ Replication-deficient AAV226
--> Safety concerns associated with vector shedding is a potential concern for replication-competent viral vectors<--
Because replication-competent viral vectors retain the ability to replicate, they are likely to shed more effectively and for a longer period into the environment compared with replication-deficient viral vectors.
This shed vector may be infectious raising the possibility of transmission of the virus-based gene therapy product to untreated individuals (e.g. close contacts and healthcare professionals)
To understand the potential risk of transmission and help evaluate measures to prevent transmission, shedding studies in the target population are conducted.
Oncolytic virus therapy Viral vector
Talimogene laherparepvec# Replication-competent HSV-127
References
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Design and analysis of shedding studies for virus or bacteria-based gene therapy and oncolytic products. Available at:"
2020 Novartis, Inc. "This site is intended for US healthcare professionals only"
FDA reference for viral vector shedding (two links to it):
The actual document itself, August 2015, in pdf only, 19 pages:
Reference No. 18 in the Novartis document:
Environmental Risk Assessment of Replication Competent Viral Vectors Applied in Clinical Trials: Potential Effects of Inserted Sequences
Authors: van den Akker, Eric; J.B. van der Vlugt, Cecile; A. Bleijs, Diederik; E. Bergmans, Hans
Source: Current Gene Therapy, Volume 13, Number 6, 2013, pp. 395-412(18)
Publisher: Bentham Science Publisher
Risk assessments of clinical applications involving genetically modified viral vectors are carried out according to general principles that are implemented in many national and regional legislations, e.g., in Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Union.
Recent developments in vector design have a large impact on the concepts that underpin the risk assessments of viral vectors that are used in clinical trials. The use of (conditionally) replication competent viral vectors (RCVVs)
--> may increase the likelihood of the exposure of the environment around the patient, <--
compared to replication defective viral vectors.
Based on this assumption we have developed a methodology for the environmental risk assessment of replication competent viral vectors, which is presented in this review.
Furthermore, the increased likelihood of exposure leads to a reevaluation of what would constitute a hazardous gene product in viral vector therapies, and a keen interest in new developments in the inserts used. One of the trends is the use of inserts produced by synthetic biology. In this review the implications of these developments for the environmental risk assessment of RCVVs are highlighted, with examples from current clinical trials.
The conclusion is drawn that RCVVs, notwithstanding their replication competency, can be applied in an environmentally safe way, in particular if adequate built-in safeties are incorporated, like conditional replication competency, as mitigating factors
--> to reduce adverse environmental effects that could occur. <--