Thursday, October 20, 2022

For Our Loved Ones

 


These two groups (what I call humans and mankind) that have become obvious during this c*vid era are two sides where the one is saddened by what the other is doing. Halloween decorations sum the two philosophies up nicely. One side has the “gravestones” saying “Did my own research, and the other has “Trusted the science.”

For my loved one, sadness is around trust given to the PCR tool, even though this one believes in “c*vid,” as well, which makes me feel defeat that outside influences can trump my influence.

So, here goes. An interactive article for our loved ones. Please use Webcrawler, Swisscows, Duck Duck Go and Google to see the differences and similarities with the sought material.

Let’s start with “c*vid,” shall we?

Search “HIV Image.”

Search “Mumps Image.”

 
Search “Rubella Image.”


Search “Measles Image.”

Search “Lyme Image.”


Bacterial…search “Chlamydia Image.”

Search “Water mine Image.”

Search “Covid-19 Image.”

Exosomes/natural non-contagious "viruses":

Keep in mind that matter found near or within a cell that is labeled a virus is only seen in black and white. Does all matter found near a cell have the shapes seen above? Does anything? Is this simply an artist’s rendition of a water mine? How come a bacterium looks the same as a virus when presented to an ignorant populace? How come many so-called viruses look the same? Have any of these viruses been isolated?

Why not simply show chlamydia in the following way? 


Does the water mine image elicit fear? Is fear the goal in order to sell a va(cine, a pharmaceutical, a narrative, or all three?

Please read this next part as it is important to this discussion, because your trusted sources have vilified people such as me who needed proof of a “pandemic” before it was given any credence at all.  Is it wrong to seek proof before offering credit to something?

I have spent the last two years writing to officials and healthcare directors for proof of the isolate known as “covid-19.” If it exists, why wasn’t proof provided? Here’s an excerpt of how I posed my request, in case you think I asked in an incomplete way.


“I am requesting that you provide proof that “covid” has been isolated and is not simply a computer-generated simulation. I ask you to please provide me with a copy of the following items:

·        produce evidence that SARS-COV2 (and all its names ie: coronavirus that is natural, contagious and harmful; covid-19 that is natural, contagious and harmful) has been isolated not using PCR—which is not a test and cannot isolate a virus—nor by a computer-generated guess, but definitive proof that a natural virus has been isolated that is a contagion.

·        produce all records describing the isolation of a SARS-COV2 virus, directly from a sample taken from an expired body, where the patient sample was not put with any other source of genetic material, for example hepatocytes, monkey kidney epithelial cells (Cercopithecus aethiops), or the like. To be clear, “isolation” means the act of separating a thing from everything else.  I am not requesting records where “isolation of SARS-COV2” refers to a culturing of a thing, or how something such as the PCR functions related to this or a sequencing of a thing.  To clarify, I am requesting all such records that are in the possession, custody or control of your office or a U. S. federal department whether downloaded to a computer or device, printed in a hard copy, or held in some fashion.

·        produce records that the isolate is contagious and harmful to humans

·        provide evidence on subjects who have received any of the covid vaccines proving that they do not transmit the virus.  Please include all subjects who started the study.  Please do not call only two out of two one hundred percent.  Please state your answer on subjects by their number, ie 100 who received the shot were around 100 non-receivers of the shot.  Twenty of the non-shot receivers became ill and the pathogen was isolated from them.  Also state how many and which company’s shot(s) was or were received by those who had the shot.

·        provide evidence on subjects who have received any of the covid vaccines proving that they cannot “catch” the virus.  Again, an example would be 100 who received this shot were placed in a room with 100 ill patients for X amount of time.  None became ill.  The 100 ill patients had the isolate to prove they were sick with a natural, contagious virus.

·        provide evidence that proves that segregating the population who have not received this pharmaceutical from those who have stops the spread of the natural, contagious virus that has been isolated.

Important to the “c*vid” topic is who are the officials, doctors and scientists that you trusted with the information you received? Are they commercial scientists or freelance? Are they affiliated with a university or freelance? Search out each individual. Has Big Pharma offered money to them ever or now? Who sponsors their opposition? If you trust a paid opinion over a freelance opinion, how come?

Has Germ Theory ever graduated from being a theory? Is it possible you were trained to believe in “germs” and helplessness to them by news, movies and other programs?

Is virology a settled science or do many arguments and discussions ensue about it? Did you decide a “virus” is a natural, contagious attacker because you saw real proof or because you heard it on a media platform? In the beginning of 2021, I witnessed three people becoming ill on three successive days. We were together on Zoom, but alone in our homes. “Yup, something’s going around.” I was the only one out of many who brought it to their attention that they did not make each other sick. Their programming was so complete that lack of health had nothing to do with their choices (in food, exercise, detoxing programs, etc.). It was ONLY that another human could MAKE them sick. If a human is helpless and woes are somebody else's fault, victimhood is satisfied.

Are you concerned that authority figures will be displeased with you if you search for answers? What voice is in your head making you wrong for stepping away to investigate yourself…For stepping away from your friends and loved ones to think for a moment? If it isn’t safe to hold different opinions, is what you fear solitude? Are you afraid that no-one would like you for questioning an accepted view?

It is time to answer these questions over calling those who have searched to find an isolated natural, contagious virus “conspiracy theorists.”

Onto the PCR tool.

Let us look at the package holding the swab that is to be shoved up your nose to come into contact with very delicate tissue. The swabs used in the “c*vid test” are sterilized using ethylene oxide—a cancer causing, sterilizing agent. To place this inside your nose repeatedly cannot possibly support health. A lot of the information supporting this statement has been removed, but this is still up.

Use the four (or more) search engines to investigate this for yourself).

https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causesprevention/risk/substances/ethylene-oxide 

and 

https://www.cancer.gov/aboutcancer/causesprevention/risk/substances/ethylene-oxide

 

The inventor of the PCR said it may not be used as a test.

https://www.brighteon.com/7ccc08b5-3ccc-479d-8c75-34f6c2ee846f. PCR tools are not searching for a “c*vid,” they are identifying pieces of DNA and RNA that have occurred within the life of that body and cannot say definitively what it means.  Depending on how many cycles it is spun, results will vary, yet swabs are placed up both nostrils, potentially exposing the other side to what the first side may be experiencing, bacterial for example.  This ritual is useless and pointless, unless a sinister reason exists for the tool being used in this fashion.

The PCR tool is used to assist in solving crimes. For instance, a suspect’s boot has one drop of blood on it. If it can be proven that it is from the brutally murdered female near to where he was seen, they can conclude that he was present when her blood was spurting upon her death. The PCR takes that one drop and multiplies it so they have enough material to work with.

Pretending it identifies a natural, contagious virus is stretching the parameters of this tool, especially in light of no natural, contagious virus having ever been isolated.  Isn’t it time to stop trusting the opponent to humanity? Isn’t it time to start looking into what is called virology and all the “tools” used to keep this religion going?

If you locate a natural, contagious virus, please post the proof in the comments below. No Health Departments the world over has been able to do so. Thank you!





No comments:

Post a Comment