You never know what key words will get attention. The truth is, we do not know if there is an easy way to have control for our health over legislated harm. So it is important to say words to eventually find the ones that work.
The system sees the average human as "dead," a pawn, steerage. Although I did sign my first and last name, which may be placing me in the steerage category, I used "living man" of the territory, because I was trying to get their attention that I am alive, a creditor, even if really, according to their standards I am a debtor.
August
13, 2019
Governor
Gavin Newsom
1303
10th Street, Suite 1173
Sacramento,
CA 95814
Dear
Governor Newsom,
As a living man in the territory known as California, I
invoke the Precautionary Principle and respectfully request that all 5G antenna
and 3G/4G/5G cell tower construction cease immediately—including, but not
limited to, those hidden and within buildings. It is in your power to prevent harm by
stopping the construction of something that may cause environmental damage—especially
if irreversible—before all the scientific proof is in. I respectfully request proof that the order
to cease construction has been given within two weeks. The impact on humanity and the environment
from emissions of these antennas and towers is uncertain, so the principle I am
invoking demands caution and monitoring before harm is done.
Whether you adhere to the Rio Declaration from the
1992 United Nations Conference on environment and development (June 3-14) which
states, “In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall
be widely applied by states according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or
irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a
reason for postponing cost effective measures to prevent environmental degradation,”
or to the 1998 Wingspread Statement on the Precautionary Principle
(January 23-25), which states, “When an activity raises threats of harm to
human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if
some cause and effect relationships are not fully established
scientifically. The process of applying
the precautionary principle must be opened, informed, and democratic, and must
include potentially affected parties. It
must also involve an examination of the full range of alternatives, including
no action. In this context, the proponent
of an activity rather than the public should bear the burden of proof,” both
trump Section 704 of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition says that state
means (p. 731), “A people permanently occupying a fixed territory bound
together by common-law habits and custom into one body politic exercising,
through the medium of an organized government, independent sovereignty and
control over all persons and things within its boundaries…The section of
territory occupied by one of the United States.” Proponent is defined as (p. 637), “One who
proposes or argues in favor of something; one who makes a proposal.” I do not
need thousands of signatures against the building of 5G antennas and cell
towers, because both of these Precautionary Principles were put into place
legally already. The burden of proof
that they are safe falls on the proponent, not me or my neighbors. I am invoking what already stands. It does not give you permission to use
Section 704 as an excuse to possibly harm us or our environment. It does order you to err on the side of
caution; to be safe over sorry.
You have a duty to anticipate and prevent harm—the
harm a military-grade weapon such as 5G can do is not too hard to anticipate,
by the way. We have a right to know details
about the use of these antennas and cell towers. Alternatives are available. Scientists within the communications field
could be sought.
I have also informed the following that I
have invoked the Precautionary Principle as a living man of the territory known
as California: Congresswoman Maxine Waters, Mayor Garcetti, Councilman Joe Buscaino, Raoul Mendoza (Chief
Management Analyst of the Department of City Planning), and my local paper and
TV station. Thank-you.
Bright Day Thoughts,
Paget
Slightly different:
August 13, 2019
Mayor
Eric Garcetti
200
N. Spring Street,
Los
Angeles, CA 90012
Dear
Mayor Garcetti:
As a living man in the territory known as California,
I invoke the Precautionary Principle and respectfully request that all 5G
antenna and 3G/4G/5G cell tower construction cease immediately—including, but
not limited to, those hidden and within buildings. It is in your power to prevent harm by
stopping the construction of something that may cause environmental damage—especially
if irreversible—before all the scientific proof is in. I respectfully request proof that the order
to cease construction has been given within two weeks,
because the mayor “should ensure the city is kept clean and
orderly, with opportunities for citizens to experience a good quality of life
and enjoy good health.”
The impact on humanity and the environment from emissions of these
antennas and towers is uncertain, so the principle I am invoking demands
caution and monitoring before harm is done.
Whether you adhere to the Rio Declaration from the
1992 United Nations Conference on environment and development (June 3-14) which states, “In order to protect the
environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by states
according to their capabilities. Where
there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific
certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost effective measures
to prevent environmental degradation,” or to the 1998 Wingspread
Statement on the Precautionary Principle (January
23-25), which states, “Where an activity raises threats of harm to human
health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some
cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically. The process of applying the precautionary
principle must be opened, informed, and democratic, and must include
potentially affected parties. It must
also involve an examination of the full range of alternatives, including no
action. In this context, the proponent
of an activity rather than the public should bear the burden of proof,” both
trump Section 704 of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition says that state
means (p. 731), “A people permanently occupying a fixed territory bound
together by common-law habits and custom into one body politic exercising,
through the medium of an organized government, independent sovereignty and
control over all persons and things within its boundaries…The section of
territory occupied by one of the United States.” Proponent is defined as (p. 637), “One who
proposes or argues in favor of something; one who makes a proposal.” I do not
need thousands of signatures against the building of 5G antennas and cell
towers, because both of these Precautionary Principles were put into place
legally already. The burden of proof
that they are safe falls on the proponent, not me or my neighbors. I am invoking what already stands. It does not give you permission to use
Section 704 as an excuse to possibly harm us or our environment. It does order you to err on the side of
caution; to be safe over sorry.
Politicians have a duty to anticipate and prevent
harm—the harm a military-grade weapon such as 5G can do is not too hard to
anticipate, by the way. We have a right
to know details about the use of these antennas and cell towers. Alternatives are available. Scientists within the communications field
could be sought.
I have also informed the following that I
have invoked the Precautionary Principle as a living man of the territory known
as California: Governor Gavin Newsom, Congresswoman Maxine Waters, Councilman
Joe Buscaino, Raoul Mendoza (Chief
Management Analyst of the Department of City Planning), and my local paper and
TV station. Thank-you.
Bright Day Thoughts,
Paget
Slightly different:
August 13, 2019
15th District, City of
Los Angeles
200 N. Spring
St Los Angeles, CA 90012
As
a living man in the territory known as LA City in California, I invoke the
Precautionary Principle and respectfully request that all 5G antenna and 3G/4G/5G
cell tower construction cease immediately—including, but not limited to, those
hidden and within buildings. If it is in
your power to prevent harm by stopping the construction of something that may cause
environmental damage—especially if irreversible—before all the scientific proof
is in, then please do so. I have requested
Governor Newsom, Congresswoman Waters, and Mayor Garcetti for proof that the
order to cease construction has been given within two weeks. The impact on humanity and the environment
from emissions of these antennas and towers is uncertain, so the principle I am
invoking demands caution and monitoring before harm is done, and I am asking
you to join me.
Whether
you adhere to the Rio Declaration from the 1992 United Nations Conference on
environment and development (June 3-14) which states, “In order to protect the
environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by states
according to their capabilities. Where
there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific
certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost effective measures
to prevent environmental degradation,” or to the 1998 Wingspread
Statement on the Precautionary Principle (January 23-25), which states, “When
an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment,
precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect
relationships are not fully established scientifically. The process of applying the precautionary
principle must be opened, informed, and democratic, and must include
potentially affected parties. It must
also involve an examination of the full range of alternatives, including no
action. In this context, the proponent
of an activity rather than the public should bear the burden of proof,”
both trump Section 704 of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Black’s
Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition says that state means (p. 731), “A people
permanently occupying a fixed territory bound together by common-law habits and
custom into one body politic exercising, through the medium of an organized
government, independent sovereignty and control over all persons and things
within its boundaries…The section of territory occupied by one of the United
States.” Proponent is defined as (p.
637), “One who proposes or argues in favor of something; one who makes a
proposal.” I do not need thousands of signatures against the building of 5G
antennas and cell towers, because both of these Precautionary Principles were put
into place legally already. The
burden of proof that they are safe falls on the proponent, not me or my
neighbors. I am invoking what
already stands. No permission has been
given to use Section 704 as an excuse to possibly harm us or our environment. It does order politicians to err on the
side of caution; to be safe over sorry.
Politicians
have a duty to anticipate and prevent harm—the harm a military-grade weapon
such as 5G can do is not too hard to anticipate, by the way. We have a right to know details about the use
of these antennas and cell towers.
Alternatives are available.
Scientists within the communications field could be sought.
I have also informed the following that I have
invoked the Precautionary Principle as a living man of the territory known as
California: Governor Gavin Newsom, Congresswoman Maxine Waters, Mayor Eric Garcetti,
Raoul Mendoza (Chief Management Analyst of the Department of City
Planning), and my local paper and TV station.
Thank-you.
Bright Day Thoughts,
Paget
Slightly different:
The
Daily Breeze
400 Continental Blvd, Suite
600
El Segundo, CA 90245
Hello the Daily Breeze:
I wanted to keep you in
the loop. I have been stopping a cell
tower from being built (so far) on a street in the South Bay Area through saying that it
will be an assault on my neighbors and me.
Since officials keep hiding behind the psychopathic legislation of
Section 704, I am attempting a new approach.
Here is the letter I sent to the people listed in the final paragraph.
As a living man in the territory known as California,
I invoke the Precautionary Principle and respectfully request that all 5G
antenna and 3G/4G/5G cell tower construction cease immediately—including, but
not limited to, those hidden and within buildings. It is in your power to prevent harm by
stopping the construction of something that may cause environmental damage—especially
if irreversible—before all the scientific proof is in. I request proof that the order to cease
construction has been given within two weeks.
The impact on humanity and the environment from emissions of these
antennas and towers is uncertain, so the principle I am invoking demands
caution and monitoring before harm is done.
Whether you adhere to the Rio Declaration from the
1992 United Nations Conference on environment and development (June 3-14) which
states, “In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall
be widely applied by states according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or
irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a
reason for postponing cost effective measures to prevent environmental
degradation,” or to the 1998 Wingspread Statement on the Precautionary
Principle (January 23-25), which states, “When an activity raises threats of
harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken
even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established
scientifically. The process of applying
the precautionary principle must be opened, informed, and democratic, and must
include potentially affected parties. It
must also involve an examination of the full range of alternatives, including
no action. In this context, the proponent
of an activity rather than the public should bear the burden of proof,”
both trump Section 704 of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition says that state
means (p. 731), “A people permanently occupying a fixed territory bound
together by common-law habits and custom into one body politic exercising,
through the medium of an organized government, independent sovereignty and
control over all persons and things within its boundaries…The section of
territory occupied by one of the United States.” Proponent is defined as (p. 637), “One who
proposes or argues in favor of something; one who makes a proposal.” I do not
need thousands of signatures against the building of 5G antennas and cell
towers, because both of these Precautionary Principles were put into place
legally already. The burden of proof
that they are safe falls on the proponent, not me or my neighbors. I am invoking what already stands. It does not give you permission to use
Section 704 as an excuse to possibly harm us or our environment. It does order you to err on the side of
caution; to be safe over sorry.
You have a duty to anticipate and prevent harm—the
harm a military-grade weapon such as 5G can do is not too hard to anticipate,
by the way. We have a right to know
details about the use of these antennas and cell towers. Alternatives are available. Scientists within the communications field
could be sought.
I have also informed the following that I
have invoked the Precautionary Principle as a living man of the territory known
as California: Governor Gavin Newsom, Congresswoman Maxine Waters, Mayor Eric
Garcetti, Councilman Joe Buscaino, Raoul Mendoza (Chief Management Analyst of the Department of City
Planning), and my local newspaper and local TV station. Thank-you.
Bright Day Thoughts,
Paget
