Authenticself Acupuncture & Beyond

Saturday, May 18, 2019

Rebuttal to The Union’s, Vaccine Safety: The state of Vaccinations

A friend sent this article by way of, “See?  You are wrong to think vaccines aren’t safe.”  So, let me walk you through this propaganda.

This article is so full of misinformation and missing information, that I almost don’t even want to bother doing this much.  To start with, many of us who see vaccines for what they are figure there is a sinister reason Pan’s handler wants SB 276 passed.  The picture is of the educated trying to demonstrate how his reasoning for the medical exemption is fraudulent.  There truly is no problem.  When SB 277 was designed, one of the key players wanted the medical exemption left in place and now Pan is going back on his word.  He knew the future.  He knew the plan.  Let me tell you what it is.  They want SB 276 to pass so when they come for the adults within two years, you will have to get vaccines before you may renew your driver’s license in California unless you have a medical exemption…which they hope you won’t be able to get.  (Time to become living men, people! Get liberated from the system.)

Jenner was incompetent.  Go ahead.  Look into him and how his vaccine killed his child along with others.

So much to say about Wakefield, as well, so I will leave you with a link for starters.  Know this, a Big Pharma employee, such as doctors and trolls, always say this about Wakefield in their posts, articles, and when in their office.  They learn a line and it’s sheer nonsense.  Though I see him as pro-vax, he seemed decent when I met him in 2002.  He rightly linked the gut to autism.

Those who support vaccines always give credit for an infection’s decline to a vaccine.  Better nutrition, better waste removal and overall cleaner environments, higher percentage of populations with natural immunity, and less stress…for example being able to go out an enjoy the arts over full-time survival mode…all contributed to the decline of people succumbing to infections.  When your gut is strong and you have the right tools at your hands…not Western Medicine, which undermines health…your body can push back and do fine against a pathogen.  Sime infections have a natural rhythm of surfacing and then seemingly going dormant.

As far as I remember, the measles vaccine was available in 1962.  Not widely, but it was around.  How many in their statistic were vaccinated?  Atypical Measles is dangerous.  At least 33% of any outbreak of measles includes vaccinated.  Sometimes more as in the at least 38% of the Disneyland fiasco.

As for the quantity of vaccines being injected into children, there is not one single vaccine schedule that has been tested for safety.  They don’t know how all these vaccines interact with each other in a bloodstream, because no study against a saline-placebo group has ever been done.  No group has ever been followed for one year, five, ten after a decent study.  (How can they prove vaccine schedules safe when an individual vaccine hasn’t been deemed safe?  There’s a reason these tests haven’t been done.)

This is how they vote vaccines in

To what DeBusk said about testing the vaccine against a group that didn’t receive the vaccine…And do you realize the other group did not receive an inert saline placebo?  They received harmful adjuvants or the older version of the vaccine they are “testing,” which isn’t rigorous….
As for unethical to expose to a disease and give them a placebo, we have a whole group who has never been vaccinated that they could use by looking at their medical records as a separate test, but I’m sorry.  If you want to say something has been rigorously tested, you have to have a group who has not received a vaccine.  You are also testing safety along with efficacy.

They do finally admit that some vaccines shed, but hospitals know it is not rare for they warn recently vaccinated to stay away from their most compromised patients.

If vaccines were set against a true saline placebo, everyone would see the gut and neurological damage that vaccines cause.  That’s why they won’t do it.

Of course doctors want children vaccinated.  They get financial rewards when a certain percentage of their clientele have shots and tests.  Further, they know vaccine injuries are big business for them.  Until the client dies, they have a customer for life.  The conflict of interest makes them a group you cannot trust.

This is another element of a Big Pharma employee.  They don’t know…or simply lie blatantly…about what herd immunity is.  Herd immunity comes from the percentage of the population that has experienced the infection in question.  Now they cannot succumb again. It has nothing to do with vaccine rates.  How can it?  The MMR, for instance, only supposedly protects, though I would argue that point…against one genotype of measles.  That is hardly protection when someone who has experienced wild measles has protection against the gamut (24 genotypes).

The NVIC is your tax dollars.  It may seem like the government is paying for the slaughter of your children, but it’s those who purchase vaccines.

Man, the author made it sound so easy to claim your kid was injured by the vaccine.  It’s a difficult process.  Only a few actually win a settlement.

In 1986, it was well-known to those who wished to sue vaccine makers that they had legislation protecting them.  You can only sue if it’s something like a vial that had expired and was shipped out anyway.  That’s why lawsuits dropped dramatically.  It took two years to implement some kind of compensation because vaccine injury was so prevalent, they had to do something.  Also, the article fails to address that the vaccine makers threatened to stop making vaccines because they were losing too much in lawsuits.  That’s why Reagan gave them a free pass.

The bottom line is that if pharmaceutical companies were liable, they would test them for safety, which would mean that they would have to be made completely differently.  (You culture something on animal parts, viruses of unknow varieties will enter your product.  They will lead to problems in some hosts.  13.1 of the inserts attests to them knowingly not being safe.  They make it sound like they just haven’t gotten around to testing them.)  Kennedy’s family don’t know about this issue.
Dr. Alexander Langmuir, the father of infectious disease epidemiology at the CDC was not owned by Big Pharma. Research him.

I have the hard copy of this very long article.  It’s very good.

Important to the conversation of power behind harmful products.  (Also, know that glyphosate is in the animals used to culture your vaccines and has infiltrated the product itself.) A vaccine cannot be called GMO-free.)

Just so you know what’s going on.


I'm not convinced those two deaths were because of measles. One was a lady in 2015 who was diagnosed with measles post-mortem. They looked at her blood after she was dead and decided that even though she had been in hospital for pneumonia, she had measles. So, I think that was a lot of BS. The child who died in 2003, was on immune suppressants and it really seems to me that the doctor didn't want to hurt his reputation about what he was doing so they just said that that child had measles. Also diagnosed after death. If these two people had had measles it should have been on their charts when they were admitted into hospital. Or it should have been added to the charts before they died.


To give you an idea about doctors and Big Pharma



And propaganda now compared to 1988, when we did not fear measles.




Vaccines and Autism


Vaccines caused autism here in this federal court case

And here page 2

And here -

Here are 83 cases reviewed by lawyers

Oh look here's a dead kid compensated

If you ever need a lawyer

Here are 127 separate studies linking vaccines and autism.

Read this about Hannah Brusewitz case and how she was harmed by DTP

Supreme Court Unavoidably Unsafe

A dose-response relationship between organic mercury exposure from thimerosal-containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders.

Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990-2010.

Is infant immunization a risk factor for childhood asthma or allergy?

Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?

Infection, vaccines and other environmental triggers of autoimmunity.

DTP with or after measles vaccination is associated with increased in-hospital mortality in Guinea-Bissau.

Measles outbreak in a vaccinated school population: epidemiology, chains of transmission and the role of vaccine failures.

A positive association found between autism prevalence and childhood vaccination uptake across the U.S. population.

Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997-2002.

Abnormal measles-mumps-rubella antibodies and CNS autoimmunity in children with autism.

The plausibility of a role for mercury in the etiology of autism: a cellular perspective

Detection of RNA of Mumps Virus during an Outbreak in a Population with a High Level of Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccine Coverage

A case series of children with apparent mercury toxic encephalopathies manifesting with clinical symptoms of regressive autistic disorders.

Aluminum in the central nervous system (CNS): toxicity in humans and animals, vaccine adjuvants, and autoimmunity.

Unvaccinated Children are Healthier

Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity

Combination MMRV vaccine linked with 2-fold risk of seizures

Impact of environmental factors on the prevalence of autistic disorder after 1979

Increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infections associated with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine.

Effectiveness of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in influenza-related hospitalization in children: a case-control study.

Speciation of methyl- and ethyl-mercury in hair of breastfed infants acutely exposed to thimerosal-containing vaccines.

Comparison of VAERS fetal-loss reports during three consecutive influenza seasons


FDA concludes vaccines cause Autism

..."the present study provides new epidemiological evidence supporting an association between increasing organic-Hg exposure from Thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines and the subsequent risk of an ASD diagnosis"...

.A two-phase study evaluating the relationship between…

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is defined by…


US health?

MMR Safe?

Nurse speaks out


Dr. Suzanne Humphries

Friday, May 17, 2019

On Vaccine Manufacturers Not Being Liable

The following was written in response to a pharmaceutical-paid troll’s comments.  Since W*eth was so much on this troll’s mind, this troll must be employed by W*eth. Educated parents do not support vaccine companies.  Only paid trolls do.

If a vaccine-making company sends out a vial that is expired and it is used, the company can be held liable.  But check out this language:
“…design defects were not mentioned because they are not a basis for liability.”  This is exactly what we, people who say that pharmaceutical companies cannot be held liable, mean.  The glass, contaminants, and metals that are in a vaccine without any benefit to the patient that in fact should not be there will not be a reason to hold them responsible.

Further the link below says, “Taxing their product to fund the compensation program, while leaving their liability for design defect virtually unaltered, would hardly coax them back into the market.”  We know that “The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA or Act) created a no-fault compensation program to stabilize a vaccine market adversely affected by an increase in vaccine-related tort litigation and to facilitate compensation to claimants who found pursuing legitimate vaccine-inflicted injuries too costly and difficult.”

We know that vaccines are taxed so you are actually paying into the fund for injuries if you support the vaccine business.  Your case will be heard by the Court of Federal Claims, naming the Health and Human Services Secretary as the respondent.  What you may not know is that this position, which is on your side in any other situation, is against you in this situation.

“As a quid pro quo,” meaning something for something else, “manufacturers enjoy significant tort-liability protections,” which means protection even though they committed a wrongful act leading to civil legal liability.  “Most importantly, the Act eliminates manufacturer liability for a vaccine’s unavoidable, adverse side effects.”

This document discusses Hannah’s famous case where the DTP killed her and the family got about $200,000, if I remember correctly.  This document says, “Wyeth removed the suit to the Federal District Court. It granted Wyeth summary judgment,” which means a judgment was entered by a court for Wyeth over the grieving mother without a full trial, “holding that the relevant Pennsylvania law was preempted,” which means stopped from being noticed, used, considered, acknowledged, “by 42 U. S. C. §300aa–22(b)(1)…” Basically, if your kid is maimed or murdered by vaccines, you get doubly screwed because you paid the tax but they make it hard for you to win a case where they won’t acknowledge the evidence, because the company is more powerful that you and they probably knew it would harm anyway.  “…which provides that ‘[n]o vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side-effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.’” You should be able to easily sue a manufacturer for a bad reaction to a pharmaceutical period!

“The NCVIA,” National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, “preempts,” take action in order to prevent from happening, “all design-defect claims against vaccine manufacturers brought by plaintiffs seeking compensation for injury or death caused by a vaccine’s side effects. Pp. 7–19. (a) Section 300aa–22(b)(1).”  This is legislation that wants to stop compensation from happening but doesn’t care about stopping injuries and deaths.  It wants to stop the heartbroken parents in their tracks.
“The language of the provision thus suggests the design is not subject to question in a tort action.”  In an infringement of a right leading to a civil liability.  The design most certainly should be up for question.

“Though products-liability law establishes three grounds for liability—defective manufacture, inadequate directions or warnings, and defective design—the Act mentions only manufacture and warnings. It thus seems that the Act’s failure to mention design-defect liability is ‘by deliberate choice, not inadvertence.’ Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co., 537 U. S. 149, 168. Pp. 7–8.
Hmm.  Well, that certainly includes more than simply offering an expired product. Since I am familiar with “drive” involving working rather than travelling, “design” needs to be investigated.  Are they admitting the designed biowarfare so if it kills it’s what they wanted.  Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Ed. Has “scheme” and “contrive” for design.  Interesting that designedly is “‘Wilfully,’ ‘Knowingly,’ ‘Unlawfully,’ and ‘Felloniously’” (p.233).  Well, it’s still interesting that they cannot be held liable for the manufacture of the product.  Unclean workers, products, and room can all fit into the manufacture part of which they are not liable.  But as for being able to use a vaccine that doesn’t have the harmful element, there are so many harmful elements in vaccines, a combination of harmful elements could have caused the injury or death with any vaccine….by design.

In Black’s Law it defines unavoidable as inevitable” (p. 792).  “Moreover, reading the phrase ‘side effects that were unavoidable’ to exempt injuries caused by flawed design would require treating ‘even though’ as a coordinating conjunction linking independent ideas when it is a concessive, subordinating conjunction conveying that one clause weakens or qualifies the other.”  Who cares about semantics?  Inevitable side effects means just that!

“Design defects do not merit a single mention in the Act or in Food and Drug Administration regulations that pervasively regulate the drug manufacturing process. This lack of guidance for design defects, combined with the extensive guidance for the two liability grounds specifically mentioned in the Act, strongly suggests that design defects were not mentioned because they are not a basis for liability. The Act’s mandates lead to the same conclusion.” Well, that’s just ridiculous, but right there it’s saying the drug companies are not liable for a design defect, so there.  That supports the truth that you can’t sue drug companies for vaccines that maim and kill unless they give you an expired vaccine.

“It [the NCVIA] provides for federal agency improvement of vaccine design and for federally prescribed compensation, which are other means for achieving the two beneficial effects of design-defect torts—prompting the development of improved designs, and providing compensation for inflicted injuries.”  Not really.  The tax is all the compensation and federal agencies have not looked into improving vaccine design.

The troll claims those educated and choosing to not vaccinate do not read the safety test…that actually don’t exist.

The CDC paper the troll provided stated:

● Currently, the United States has the safest, most effective vaccine supply in its history

Um.  Excuse me.  There is no proof that vaccines are safe.  They are cultured on animal parts.  Animals have a plethora of viruses that come into the vaccine product.  You can get exposure to many awful pathogens by vaccines.  Glass has been found in them. You want to find weirdness?  Go read about what has been found in these so-called safe vaccines.

They are tested extensively by their paid robots who can’t speak against the company.  People who have signed a hush clause.  Vaccines are sometimes effective at giving the infection they are intended to prevent, but that’s about it.  What studies?  Where are the double-blind studies against a saline-placebo-receiving group who has never been vaccinated?  Where’s the data one year later?  Five years later?  Ten years later?  In fact, where are the comparisons of vaccine-free adults’ health records against vaccine receivers’ health records?  Nothing.  No proof.

More doctors right now know about VAERS compared to any other time, but not many use it.  They also are not trained in detecting vaccine injuries.  Immunization is an incorrect word for vaccine.  To experience the infection is to be immunized against it.

Sunday, May 12, 2019

Appeal Paperwork to Stop Cell Tower To Be Erected

"I am appealing the decision to allow a (name of mobile/cell phone company) cell tower to stand on (street name) near my home, because cell towers emit radiation and are able to go to 5G, which is millimeter waves (like an airport scanner) and they have been proven harmful.  Cell towers are a display of force that give me reason to fear and expect immediate bodily harm.

I am aware of Section 704 of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, but I know according to the Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) of the United States Constitution, federal laws are only the 'Supreme Law of the Land' so long as the federal law in question is valid, i. e. Constitutional.  Section 704, which states that state and local governments cannot interfere with wireless facilities 'on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions' is unconstitutional, therefore California’s criminal code, as well as the U.S. Penal Code stand supreme against Section 704.

Assault is illegal in California.  Black’s Law Dictionary (5th Ed.) defines assault as, 'Any willful attempt or threat to inflict injury upon the person of another, when coupled with an apparent present ability to do so, and any intentional display of force such as would give the victim reason to fear or expect immediate bodily harm.'  Countless planning commissioners have heard countless testimony about the harms of cell towers and have ignored it due to Section 704.  Black’s Law continues.  'An assault may be committed without actually touching, or striking, or doing bodily harm, to the person of another.'  You will be harming us with your decision to allow a tower that will go 5G near my house, even without standing there yourself.

Irradiating the public goes against Chapter 5 Article 6 (Public Safety) of the Public Health Code. Health and Safety Code, Article 9 mentions air sanitation.  The surrounding air needs to be considered in light of 'health, illness, irritation on the senses, and death of human beings.' Radiation traveling in our air falls under this.  The California Civil Code (Right of Protection, 43) states, 'Besides the personal rights mentioned in government codes, every person has, provided by the law, the right of protection from bodily harm and injury to his personal relations.'  

Fifth Generation (5G) causes miscarriages, which also goes against the civil code 43.1: 'A child conceived, but not yet born is deemed an existing person.'  It is unconstitutional to follow a federal law that says we cannot fight for unborn children.

I am aggrieved by your decision to allow a cell tower near my home, because of known health threats such as cell damage, and by your blatant disregard to human health all because of a piece of paper with Section 704 written on it as if humans do not matter!

I believe any decision-maker who places government authority over living men is making a grave mistake that all of humanity will pay for."

At the hearing, my neighbors and I will hold signed papers from various health care practitioners that state that electromagnetic radiation is harmful to our health.  I will submit a request about altering their intentions to be in alignment with the good of the people.  "You are now aware," we will say by way of warning.

I just found this yesterday.  Awesome.  It was Max Igan mentioning Ray's ideas on air that inspired my appeal.

Sunday, March 10, 2019

Reflections on Captain Marvel

Admittedly, I am not into The Avengers series, so I am unable to run all the stories together in my mind.  Even so, I see what The They—The Puppeteers—are informing you with this movie as they have had information for you in the others.  All through this movie, I found myself saying, “Ah, that’s true.  That’s true.”  There was one HUGE lie, though.  You do not “fight” an “evil” opponent with your weapon of force.  You do something else.  (You also don’t dry dishes and then place them on the drying rack. You wash, place on drying rack, dry, put away or in a stack.  But I chalk that one up to no-one on the set having experience with hand-washing dishes.)  Also, women can have a powerful job by staying at home nurturing children instead of going out and fighting bad guys.  It is not being a bad example to choose to stay home, supporting children into growing up to become Whole, secure, and loving.

         Anyway, some of the truths: 
              1) There is an implant that binds up your power.  Remove it and you are
                  powerful again and one kind of implant is very close to GB 12, where
                  the implant in the movie looked to be. 
               2) With the implant gone, you may soar to anywhere; anytime.  You may
                   have to remember how to hold so much power.
               3) An outside “force” (such as the circle she stood on when the “vine”  
                  went into her and she was transported elsewhere) can assist you in
                  being elsewhere.  You are made up of many subtle bodies and can tune
                  in alone or with support.
               4) AI is not your friend.
               5) You think you know the bad guy from the good guy.  Example, which
                   country is supporting the so-called enemy country or group?  Are you
                   sure it’s not your own?
               6) Shapeshifting is real.  You can learn…actually…remember how to do
                   this, too.

Those are just a few points that I recall.  The important take away is that for some reason those presently in control have to inform us about plans and such.  It is as if we have entered the theatre and they have handed us the program.  You just have to know how to read it.  I think part of why there is a need for disclosure may be to simply say that non-humans or AI will be revealing themselves or itself soon, but there may be more to it than that.  They may be programming us to stand back and allow those seeking a home to come in and take over our cultures and make it theirs.  Who knows!  But again, the answer is not to use a weapon of force.


Sunday, February 17, 2019

The Reality Behind No True Testing for Vaccines—Paget Anne of Essendon

What would a true vaccination study look like if it were a reality?  Let’s look at a pretend investigation for three shots in one called the MMR to answer this question.  First, all humans involved with the study on the “science” side shouldn’t have to sign a gag-contract.  They should be able to publish their findings, to freely talk about the process, and to show results, as long as no names of the children are released.  These scientists should be impartial.  Next, there would be two equally divided groups of children.  The testers wouldn’t know which group the recipient of the MMR was or which was the control group.  Most importantly, at the commencement of the study, there would be 100+ three-year-olds called upon who had never received a single vaccine in their whole lives, nor the synthetic vitamin K shot at birth.  Further, their mothers would have received no vaccines during pregnancy and had no amalgam fillings in their mouths during pregnancy or while breastfeeding.  (This last requirement is due to the possible ten percent exposure of mercury to the offspring.)

In a perfect world, the mothers would be able to trust the ones preparing the two shots and know that at least one group would be receiving a saline solution in a shot and that the other would be only receiving the MMR.  These two groups would receive no other shots while being carefully followed for at least fifteen years.  Since all races would be represented in both groups, it would be easy for testers to document differences. 

In reality, the pro-vaxx mothers would have already allowed so many vaccines by age three that it would be difficult to find non-vaxxed children of mothers who are willing to allow their children to possibly receive the MMR.  Further, these mothers would insist on their children receiving all the vaccines available out there, not just possibly the MMR, while those mothers who have researched and have chosen to not have their children vaccinated would never permit their children to be in a study where they might receive the MMR.  The mothers of non-vaxxed children would say there is proof enough that the MMR is not safe by the comparisons they already see.  My adult non-vaccinated child, for instance, doesn’t need an emotional support animal, has never been admitted into hospital (yet alone within her first two-years of life like so many children this past decade), has never had an ear ache (yet alone ear infections that may lead to tubes and deafness), has never suffered from eczema, asthma, allergies, or auto-immune diseases that have plagued countless vaccinated elementary school-aged children.

Could it be that because pharmaceutical companies cannot be sued (thanks to legislation) that the rich CEO’s are happy to get away without conducting true studies that they know will fail?  No testing like what I’ve suggested has ever happened for any vaccine, yet doctors can make a profit if certain age groups in their practices receive certain vaccines.  This should be reason enough for vaccines to not be permitted on the market, yet alone mandated. 

Why aren’t pro-vaxx parents who say they love science not clamoring for science?  True science is testing two groups where only one variable is different.  The reality behind no true testing for vaccines is that the propaganda machine has been so effective and profitable that they simply don’t need to.