Wednesday, August 14, 2019

Conscious Creations: A Thought Away

"After reading Illusions by Richard Bach, I wondered what thing I could consciously create.  Day after day, I looked around to see what was absent—a most challenging undertaking!
Finally, I decided on a clown.  I gave him a purple shirt with big red polka dots, bright shiny yellow long shorts, red and white striped socks atop long red shoes, a wide red smile, and a big red nose.  I felt the presence of this clown, along with picturing it in front of me...." (Read More) https://consciousshiftcommunity.com/illusions/

Invoking Precautionary Principle to Stop Construction of Cell Towers & 5G Antennas


You never know what key words will get attention.  The truth is, we do not know if there is an easy way to have control for our health over legislated harm.  So it is important to say words to eventually find the ones that work.  

The system sees the average human as "dead," a pawn, steerage.  Although I did sign my first and last name, which may be placing me in the steerage category, I used "living man" of the territory, because I was trying to get their attention that I am alive, a creditor, even if really, according to their standards I am a debtor.


August 13, 2019


Governor Gavin Newsom
1303 10th Street, Suite 1173
Sacramento, CA 95814


Dear Governor Newsom,

As a living man in the territory known as California, I invoke the Precautionary Principle and respectfully request that all 5G antenna and 3G/4G/5G cell tower construction cease immediately—including, but not limited to, those hidden and within buildings.  It is in your power to prevent harm by stopping the construction of something that may cause environmental damage—especially if irreversible—before all the scientific proof is in.  I respectfully request proof that the order to cease construction has been given within two weeks.  The impact on humanity and the environment from emissions of these antennas and towers is uncertain, so the principle I am invoking demands caution and monitoring before harm is done.

Whether you adhere to the Rio Declaration from the 1992 United Nations Conference on environment and development (June 3-14) which states, “In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by states according to their capabilities.  Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost effective measures to prevent environmental degradation,” or to the 1998 Wingspread Statement on the Precautionary Principle (January 23-25), which states, “When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically.  The process of applying the precautionary principle must be opened, informed, and democratic, and must include potentially affected parties.  It must also involve an examination of the full range of alternatives, including no action.  In this context, the proponent of an activity rather than the public should bear the burden of proof,” both trump Section 704 of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition says that state means (p. 731), “A people permanently occupying a fixed territory bound together by common-law habits and custom into one body politic exercising, through the medium of an organized government, independent sovereignty and control over all persons and things within its boundaries…The section of territory occupied by one of the United States.”  Proponent is defined as (p. 637), “One who proposes or argues in favor of something; one who makes a proposal.” I do not need thousands of signatures against the building of 5G antennas and cell towers, because both of these Precautionary Principles were put into place legally already.  The burden of proof that they are safe falls on the proponent, not me or my neighbors.  I am invoking what already stands.  It does not give you permission to use Section 704 as an excuse to possibly harm us or our environment.  It does order you to err on the side of caution; to be safe over sorry. 

You have a duty to anticipate and prevent harm—the harm a military-grade weapon such as 5G can do is not too hard to anticipate, by the way.  We have a right to know details about the use of these antennas and cell towers.  Alternatives are available.  Scientists within the communications field could be sought.

I have also informed the following that I have invoked the Precautionary Principle as a living man of the territory known as California: Congresswoman Maxine Waters, Mayor Garcetti, Councilman Joe Buscaino, Raoul Mendoza (Chief Management Analyst of the Department of City Planning), and my local paper and TV station.  Thank-you.



Bright Day Thoughts,


Paget 


Slightly different:



 August 13, 2019



Mayor Eric Garcetti
200 N. Spring Street,
Los Angeles, CA 90012


Dear Mayor Garcetti:

As a living man in the territory known as California, I invoke the Precautionary Principle and respectfully request that all 5G antenna and 3G/4G/5G cell tower construction cease immediately—including, but not limited to, those hidden and within buildings.  It is in your power to prevent harm by stopping the construction of something that may cause environmental damage—especially if irreversible—before all the scientific proof is in.  I respectfully request proof that the order to cease construction has been given within two weeks, because the mayor “should ensure the city is kept clean and orderly, with opportunities for citizens to experience a good quality of life and enjoy good health.”  The impact on humanity and the environment from emissions of these antennas and towers is uncertain, so the principle I am invoking demands caution and monitoring before harm is done.

Whether you adhere to the Rio Declaration from the 1992 United Nations Conference on environment and development (June 3-14) which states, “In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by states according to their capabilities.  Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost effective measures to prevent environmental degradation,” or to the 1998 Wingspread Statement on the Precautionary Principle (January 23-25), which states, “Where an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically.  The process of applying the precautionary principle must be opened, informed, and democratic, and must include potentially affected parties.  It must also involve an examination of the full range of alternatives, including no action.  In this context, the proponent of an activity rather than the public should bear the burden of proof,” both trump Section 704 of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition says that state means (p. 731), “A people permanently occupying a fixed territory bound together by common-law habits and custom into one body politic exercising, through the medium of an organized government, independent sovereignty and control over all persons and things within its boundaries…The section of territory occupied by one of the United States.”  Proponent is defined as (p. 637), “One who proposes or argues in favor of something; one who makes a proposal.” I do not need thousands of signatures against the building of 5G antennas and cell towers, because both of these Precautionary Principles were put into place legally already.  The burden of proof that they are safe falls on the proponent, not me or my neighbors.  I am invoking what already stands.  It does not give you permission to use Section 704 as an excuse to possibly harm us or our environment.  It does order you to err on the side of caution; to be safe over sorry. 

Politicians have a duty to anticipate and prevent harm—the harm a military-grade weapon such as 5G can do is not too hard to anticipate, by the way.  We have a right to know details about the use of these antennas and cell towers.  Alternatives are available.  Scientists within the communications field could be sought.

I have also informed the following that I have invoked the Precautionary Principle as a living man of the territory known as California: Governor Gavin Newsom, Congresswoman Maxine Waters, Councilman Joe Buscaino, Raoul Mendoza (Chief Management Analyst of the Department of City Planning), and my local paper and TV station.  Thank-you.



Bright Day Thoughts,


Paget 



 Slightly different:


August 13, 2019


15th District, City of Los Angeles
200 N. Spring St Los Angeles, CA 90012



As a living man in the territory known as LA City in California, I invoke the Precautionary Principle and respectfully request that all 5G antenna and 3G/4G/5G cell tower construction cease immediately—including, but not limited to, those hidden and within buildings.  If it is in your power to prevent harm by stopping the construction of something that may cause environmental damage—especially if irreversible—before all the scientific proof is in, then please do so.  I have requested Governor Newsom, Congresswoman Waters, and Mayor Garcetti for proof that the order to cease construction has been given within two weeks.  The impact on humanity and the environment from emissions of these antennas and towers is uncertain, so the principle I am invoking demands caution and monitoring before harm is done, and I am asking you to join me.

Whether you adhere to the Rio Declaration from the 1992 United Nations Conference on environment and development (June 3-14) which states, “In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by states according to their capabilities.  Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost effective measures to prevent environmental degradation,” or to the 1998 Wingspread Statement on the Precautionary Principle (January 23-25), which states, “When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically.  The process of applying the precautionary principle must be opened, informed, and democratic, and must include potentially affected parties.  It must also involve an examination of the full range of alternatives, including no action.  In this context, the proponent of an activity rather than the public should bear the burden of proof,” both trump Section 704 of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition says that state means (p. 731), “A people permanently occupying a fixed territory bound together by common-law habits and custom into one body politic exercising, through the medium of an organized government, independent sovereignty and control over all persons and things within its boundaries…The section of territory occupied by one of the United States.”  Proponent is defined as (p. 637), “One who proposes or argues in favor of something; one who makes a proposal.” I do not need thousands of signatures against the building of 5G antennas and cell towers, because both of these Precautionary Principles were put into place legally already.  The burden of proof that they are safe falls on the proponent, not me or my neighbors.  I am invoking what already stands.  No permission has been given to use Section 704 as an excuse to possibly harm us or our environment.  It does order politicians to err on the side of caution; to be safe over sorry. 

Politicians have a duty to anticipate and prevent harm—the harm a military-grade weapon such as 5G can do is not too hard to anticipate, by the way.  We have a right to know details about the use of these antennas and cell towers.  Alternatives are available.  Scientists within the communications field could be sought.

I have also informed the following that I have invoked the Precautionary Principle as a living man of the territory known as California: Governor Gavin Newsom, Congresswoman Maxine Waters, Mayor Eric Garcetti, Raoul Mendoza (Chief Management Analyst of the Department of City Planning), and my local paper and TV station.  Thank-you.



Bright Day Thoughts,


Paget 



 Slightly different:


 August 13, 2019



The Daily Breeze
400 Continental Blvd, Suite 600
El Segundo, CA 90245


Hello the Daily Breeze:

I wanted to keep you in the loop.  I have been stopping a cell tower from being built (so far) on a street in the South Bay Area through saying that it will be an assault on my neighbors and me.  Since officials keep hiding behind the psychopathic legislation of Section 704, I am attempting a new approach.  Here is the letter I sent to the people listed in the final paragraph.

As a living man in the territory known as California, I invoke the Precautionary Principle and respectfully request that all 5G antenna and 3G/4G/5G cell tower construction cease immediately—including, but not limited to, those hidden and within buildings.  It is in your power to prevent harm by stopping the construction of something that may cause environmental damage—especially if irreversible—before all the scientific proof is in.  I request proof that the order to cease construction has been given within two weeks.  The impact on humanity and the environment from emissions of these antennas and towers is uncertain, so the principle I am invoking demands caution and monitoring before harm is done.

Whether you adhere to the Rio Declaration from the 1992 United Nations Conference on environment and development (June 3-14) which states, “In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by states according to their capabilities.  Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost effective measures to prevent environmental degradation,” or to the 1998 Wingspread Statement on the Precautionary Principle (January 23-25), which states, “When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically.  The process of applying the precautionary principle must be opened, informed, and democratic, and must include potentially affected parties.  It must also involve an examination of the full range of alternatives, including no action.  In this context, the proponent of an activity rather than the public should bear the burden of proof,” both trump Section 704 of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition says that state means (p. 731), “A people permanently occupying a fixed territory bound together by common-law habits and custom into one body politic exercising, through the medium of an organized government, independent sovereignty and control over all persons and things within its boundaries…The section of territory occupied by one of the United States.”  Proponent is defined as (p. 637), “One who proposes or argues in favor of something; one who makes a proposal.” I do not need thousands of signatures against the building of 5G antennas and cell towers, because both of these Precautionary Principles were put into place legally already.  The burden of proof that they are safe falls on the proponent, not me or my neighbors.  I am invoking what already stands.  It does not give you permission to use Section 704 as an excuse to possibly harm us or our environment.  It does order you to err on the side of caution; to be safe over sorry. 

You have a duty to anticipate and prevent harm—the harm a military-grade weapon such as 5G can do is not too hard to anticipate, by the way.  We have a right to know details about the use of these antennas and cell towers.  Alternatives are available.  Scientists within the communications field could be sought.

I have also informed the following that I have invoked the Precautionary Principle as a living man of the territory known as California: Governor Gavin Newsom, Congresswoman Maxine Waters, Mayor Eric Garcetti, Councilman Joe Buscaino, Raoul Mendoza (Chief Management Analyst of the Department of City Planning), and my local newspaper and local TV station.  Thank-you.


Bright Day Thoughts,


Paget 













Wednesday, July 31, 2019

Harbor Planning Commission Allows Cell Tower, Neglects Hearing

Dear Mr. M,

There are a few things I have to get off my chest.

So far, I have only heard how the rules are in your office’s favor. Your office can be negligent from my view by not securing a quorum and holding a hearing, and that that seeming negligence can be in support of a cell tower going up. I haven’t seen anything about my rights.

Where is my choice such as regarding rules for an appellant when the planning commission’s quorum isn’t reached as is listed here? I should be given an option of 1 or 3 if the planning commissions office can’t find 5. There has to be rules written somewhere. I would like to see them, please, as demonstrated here:

“This bill, until January 1, 2030, would require the office to establish a process under which a person filing an appeal may opt to appear before one administrative law judge, rather than a tax appeal panel, when…” *
This is an example from a business that has rules for how this office runs things. Surely, I am protected from your office’s negligence in writing somewhere.

If your office fails to hold a hearing, then your office should automatically refund my money. By placing me in the position of requesting a refund, you are setting me up to make it seem like I am rescinding the appeal, which is a lie. I jumped through all the hoops I was asked to. After I do this, you will show me the rule that I am the one who just ended the process. If I hire you to sing at a party and you don’t show up, you should send me my money back. I should not have to ask for it.

Also, I should be reimbursed the $22 for parking and the $22 for all the copies I made per the appeals process’ request. Were five copies for the quorum your office neglected to secure? Who were the other three for? If they had anything to do with this, then why couldn’t they sit on the quorum?

Your office not setting up a hearing only hurt me, not your office or V****** (cell phone company), and that is inappropriate. If you don’t set up a hearing, then V****** should be denied. That this company wasn’t denied makes me think that you are hiding behind words on paper (Section 704) and never intended to hear what the public had to say; therefore, this whole process was fraudulent.

I have been calling the planning commissioner’s office and the zoning administration offices since about 10 days after handing in the appeal. There is no way that 75th day just sneaked up on your office. Every time I called, I was either given the run around or ignored.
You told me that when your office realized it was so close to the 75th day, your office approached V****** and asked them if they could have an extension. Wait. Hold the phone! What? The fox gets to guard the hen-house? How is that appropriate? That is a conflict of interest right there. V****** didn’t want to grant extra time for the planning commissioners to come up with enough people to listen to the appeal, because it is not in their best interest to have a hearing. If time runs out, then the appellant should be the winner, or else there is no reason for your office to set up a hearing. Your exact words, "Unfortunately your appeal [hearing] was not scheduled and the Harbor Area Planning Commission loses its ability to make a decision on this appeal." Why is this job given to your office if there is no consequence to you for not setting up a hearing?

The other story I heard from Ms. C was that Mr. I, the zoning administer who decided a tower would be fine and sent us letters informing us that we could appeal his decision, did not hand the file/my appeal in in a timely manner, therefore his original decision stands. Still a fox guarding the hen-house. (Another person at zoning this time, told me that J of V****** didn’t want Aug 6th, so if what she says is true, V****** really do hold all the power…) So since I was given so many stories along the way, it is hard to know the truth. I do know the group in the hearing that happened after our original hearing back in February has appealed part of the decision that was made and will be having their hearing on August 6. It is possible that was to be our quorum, and that J of V****** said no, the date didn’t work for him. And if that is true and he was given that kind of power, something is very wrong.
I have to straight out ask you. How do the planning commission or zoning administration, or both benefit by a tower going up? At least one of these offices condoned the tower being built through inaction. Any job that is supposed to have five officials at hearings would make certain that they are there. They would hire enough people.

I am sorry that the health and safety code of California can be snuffed out by Section 704. I am even more sorry that your office is supporting such evil and without even giving us a chance to say why we appeal the decision, even if just to be documented if there are any future generations to revisit how insane our officials were.
Bright Day Thoughts,
A "living man of the territory" who deserves better,
Paget


Making Cell Towers Unnecessary

The US federal government strong arms officials in all states with their 1996 Telecommunications Act, Section 704.  (Good reading if you need proof that governments do not put people first.)

Individuals are the only support that communities can expect to keep them safe.  (You would think it would be the health and safety groups of various states, but it is not so.)

Here are some tips that if we all did, would tell cell phone companies that we don't need their towers.

1) Get rid of your cell phone.  If this seems too big a sacrifice, then take the baby step of getting a regular cell phone and wean yourself off the SMART phone slowly.  If that seems too big a step, leave your phone at home as often as you can.  If that seems too big of a step, then start by turning your phone off for lengthy periods of time, especially if it is with you in the car.  If your phone is on, it makes it easier for you to be tracked and also irradiates you more as the phone reaches out to the closest cell tower constantly as you are moving.

2) Ditch Wi-Fi in your home.  Use a cable for your computer and most systems can go Wi-Fi briefly for a cell phone.  Honestly, if you have Wi-Fi in your home, some sinister official can crank it up so to speak and control your mind or turn you to dust.  If that seems far-fetched to you, then simply investigate the stress constant Wi-Fi causes the human body and ditch it for that reason.

3) Get a landline.  This is safer to use compared to a cell phone and we don't need their towers to use them.  My rotary phone is quite a conversational piece and the line only costs me $10/month, including free interstate and international calls to most countries.

4) Use cash.  Your cell phone is to be used to keep track of you and to give or subtract credits as an official sees fit.  If we use cash, instead of especially banking on our phones, we are foiling their plans of control for us.

5) If you still use a cell phone, use your computer to watch your YouTube or television shows.  Divorce yourself from the phone as much as possible.  Use your computer to help you with music.  I still listen to cassette tapes, records, and CD's, but there have to be other choices for you than your phone.

6) Get rid of the SMART meter.  5G will work with this contraption.  We do not need a military grade weapon as a gas meter.  See the group Inpower for tips how to go about this.
Secret
Militarized
Armament
Residential
Technology may give you a false sense of security, but these SMART appliances are ultimately spy and kill technology.
Many of us raised children without baby monitors and SMART diapers. Many of us have looked out for our neighbors.  We knew if someone suspect or suspicious was around.  SMART is making people anti-social and lazy.  We need to be smart ourselves and honor community.

Monday, July 29, 2019

"How come we're not banning everyone from the buses who don't have vaccines that haven't been invented yet for the many different pathogens that are here with us?
How come pro-vaxxers only fear the pathogens we have vaccines for?"
-Paget Anne of Essendon


"The USA just pretends to offer religious freedom. If a pharmaceutical company can pay the right price to politicians, to doctors, and to the media, you can be mandated to go against your religion. How is this different from a tyrant king? How is this the land of the free?
Oh, you say you are in fear of the religious one who doesn't want a pharmaceutical that has never been proven safe or necessary to be injected into his temple because his decision could kill you? You're saying you fear a person who holds a different belief because you see them as dangerous. How come people who fear the non-vaccinated don't think they're ignorant of the workings of the human body and infections just as when people fear strangers, there's something not known?
Look at what's happening. You are being convinced to not allow someone to practice their religion because someone has gotten you to discredit the power of your body and to be crippled by fear.
So, in the US, the religious one is not the only one who is not free.
-Paget Anne of Essendon



"Discrimination is okay when it stems from a programmed belief in a pharmaceutical." 

-Paget Anne of Essendon


"So let me get this straight. Your God didn't do a good enough job when your body was made and you need pharmaceuticals that haven't been tested for safety from a pharmaceutical company that can't be held liable to be injected into your system multiple times in order for you to have peace of mind that your body can function. Got it.
I, on the other hand, have a very healthy respect for the human body, what it is made up of, and what it can do."
-Paget Anne of Essendon





"The USA just pretends to offer religious freedom.  If a pharmaceutical company can pay the right price to politicians, to doctors, and to the media, you can be mandated to go against your religion.  How is this different from a tyrant king?  How is this the land of the free?

Oh, you say you are in fear of the religious one who doesn't want a pharmaceutical that has never been proven safe or necessary to be injected into his temple because his decision could kill you?  You're saying you fear a person who holds a different belief because you see them as dangerous.  How come people who fear the non-vaccinated don't think they're ignorant of the workings of the human body and infections when they've gotten their education from Big Pharma and the government? How come it is acceptable to them to discriminate against anyone when they stand on their moral high-horses against others who discriminate?

Look at what's happening.  You are being convinced to not allow someone to practice their religion because someone has gotten you to discredit the power of your body and to be crippled by fear.

So, the religious one is not the only one who is not free.

-Paget Anne of Essendon









Measles Theory

"I think people misunderstand what measles is. Measles is from heat that comes when a baby is developing inutero that's left over. When the child is about 5 years old or so, it's time for that heat to leave. We shouldn't interfere with that expression of that latent gestational pathogenic heat. We certainly should not suppress it.
Now, maybe if a child has adequate vitamin A, the releasing of the heat is uneventful. Perhaps the 24 genomes associated with the infection known as wild measles come out of dormancy to help express the latent heat only when vitamin A is inadequate to keep them dormant. Perhaps there's nothing to eradicate.
I just think we act like we know everything when perhaps we have measles, and other infections, all wrong."
-Paget Anne of Essendon

Monday, July 1, 2019

The Cell Tower/5G/EMF Radiation Rabbit Hole



by Paget Anne of Essendon


I have signs that I use at protests against cell towers in general and 5G installation specifically.  When the signs are stored in my garage, I can’t help but feel what a waste it is, so I have started placing them at the windshield and back window of my car.  One to four signs can be displayed at a time, rotating with the ones stuck in the garage.  They have become like bumper stickers shouting out cell tower/5G/EMF radiation slogans to people outside my car.

I was asked if I think the signs are effective.  The contemplative person added, “I am wondering if the average person knows what you are talking about.”  My first thought was that the signs are effective in not being messages going to waste between protests.  My second thought was far more detailed and finally, my third thought, The masses are programable, came much later, but it was the answer I elected to give.

The detailed thought was in deciding the definition of my target audience.  It is not those who are reactors (experiencing fear-based immediate hysterics after hearing and seeing blurbs on the news), parrots (repeating sound bites and slogans offered on the news), and automatons (non-thinking reactors and parrots who may be cut off from their light who are drawn to watching the news), i.e. the masses.  This group is gullible and programable, yes, so eventually they may get hypnotized, rather than consciously educated, into seeing cell towers as harmful and 5G as a military weapon.  But my concern, overall, is not this group.  The reactors, parrots, and automatons can certainly benefit if they read the signs and research the ideas presented, but with all the inner chattering—repetition of sound bites and slogans from the news and personal dramas that goes on in their heads—chances are that they may not even see my car or its cell tower/5G/EMF radiation messages.

My target audience is the group who is either awake and looking for a fellow like-minded community, or those who know something isn’t right and are starting to question so-called reality, watching and listening to less news along the way.  My intended audience is those who once thought smart (as in SMART phone) means that the phone is smart.  Formerly, the SMART phone was thought of as smart, because it can answer spelling and definition questions, instruct how to get from point A to point B, and calculate math, alongside a billion other tasks beyond what mere mortals once imagined.  If this group is able to and remembers to, they will search the fragments from my signs remembered such as “LED bulbs send & receive 5G.”  Some in this group will go down the cell tower/5G/EMF radiation rabbit hole and become over-whelmed and disinterested until in the future, a friend makes a comment or such and they search again.  Others will go down this rabbit hole and surface a car sign-carrying charter member themselves, perhaps taking their campaign to another level.  Others may do absolutely nothing beyond noticing some aspect of the SMART takeover, even if it’s simply noticing how hot their cell phones feel in their pockets.

The masses are programmable as proven by the latest sound bite offered on the news that gets repeated over and over by the masses, so a benefit other than perhaps  reaching my target audience is that I just may reach an average Joe who may allow himself to be programmed by other than Big Pharma’s, the government’s, or certain business’ manipulations.  Perhaps he will start thinking, “5G virtual prison,” “5G nosebleeds and loose teeth,” or “Dirty electricity” and wonder at the chants in his head enough to investigate. 

At any rate, right now my goal is to support humanity in becoming aware of the SMART prison that is coming.  A car being parked with slogans in it harms the public less than a bumper sticker, because the car is not moving on the freeway, for example.  It requires little effort beyond placing the posters in the car and taking them down.   There's really no reason not to display the signs.  So, while I do other work in support of turning the tide to where the masses will become the enlightened powerful group—who will not allow Big Pharma, governments, and businesses to harm humanity—and the few will be the programmable automatons, right now, by focusing on getting the information on cell towers/5G/EMF radiation out there, I am making tomorrow possible and gentle so the programmable masses of today can be shown the way to liberty.

The time is now.  If you don’t go down the cell tower/5G/EMF radiation rabbit hole and emerge with understanding about the weapon presently known as the cell phone, then it will be too late to become anything other than a deceased reactor, parrot, and automaton.


Sunday, May 26, 2019

Doctor’s Support to Stop 5G


First of all, to clarify about 5G.  Fourth generation cell towers will go 5G as soon as the-criminal-that-believe-they-be are ready to turn 5G on.  Secondly, there will be smaller posts and places with 5G antennas on them closer to each other than there are towers right now.  If we can stop the cell towers, we can stop 5G.  If you don't know why we should stop a military-grade weapon, then go research and come back later.  This article is to help you when you receive a letter informing you a cell tower is to go up near your home or you are already up to fighting the arrogant planning commissioner of your city.

In order to use getting a restraining order against the parties involved with constructing a cell tower, you need to develop a reasonable fear that this tower is going to harm you.  Go to your medical doctor.  Ask, “Doctor, does electrical-magnetic radiation cause harm?”    If this professional knows the answer is yes, great.  Have a letter drawn up stating so. If the doctor answers, “Depends…”  Take notes on what he or she is saying. The first thing we need is a letter from a doctor informing those concerned that this professional recognizes that electro-magnetic radiation will harm his or her patient, namely…you.

Having a doctor’s note removes the science.  Remember, the courts see science as subjective because the pro-tower side can also bring in experts that can say otherwise.  This is known as subjective.  (Even if it should be known as bribery, because the research revealing the harm of radiation emitting towers truly isn’t an opinion and obviously the pro-tower side is being paid handsomely.)  The letter from the doctor is a medical expert identifying that there is a reasonable belief that the tower will harm.

How to go about getting the letter… 

Make the appointment and say, “I believe” or “I’m concerned a cell tower to be erected near my house is going to harm me.”  Perhaps at this point, the doctor will interrupt affirming your belief is so or denying it.  Either way, perhaps you will see where he or she stands on the subject.  If it is denying harm then ask, “Well, explain to me then why my dentist gives me a lead bib with x-rays?”  But if you don’t want to be confrontational perhaps simply ask, “Can you please look at the science?  I have these links for starters if you’d like.  You can get back to me and please tell me if you think this is safe or not.”  Add research links that you feel are important but keep these two at the top.



If the doctor needs time before giving a letter, ask that if he or she decides to write a letter, to please state that in following the precautionary principle, if there is a risk of harm, the doctor is advising to avoid that risk.

You are concerned that those involved with the tower are threatening to assault you.  Your concern is based on a fear that has been substantiated by a medical doctor.  It is a reasonable fear.  Substantiated evidence is considered to be objective and admissible.

Earlier, I stated that the letters are needed in order to get a restraining order.  Clearly, first, we need our letters so we may put the planning commissioner, cell tower representative, and the owner of the property that will make money for having a cell tower on the premises on notice.  We are warning them all that we see a tower as an unwanted assault.  We are basically setting it up that we all will file a restraining order against them but without coming right out and saying it.

Go get your letters!


Serve the World Through Saving Your City from 5G


Hello 5G-Free Team,

I am making a plan for both a hearing with the planning commissioner of your city and for a court if needed later.  Here are some points that will assist your city in not going 5G, so please do the things you can and ask neighbors and family members to consider these points, as well.

·         Get a landline

·         Use cash

·         Use a computer more and old-style cameras instead of your cell phone

·         Get rid of microwave

·         Get rid of Smart meter and smart appliances and research if cable over wi-fi has less EMF's.



We need to be able to say, “Yes” or “No” to certain questions that may be asked during the land commissioner’s hearing or even a court hearing to come.  The following is an explanation of the points in detail:

They may ask, “Do you have a land line?” to prove that you’re full of it and are crying about cell phones when they obviously already work in your home.  You are already allowing yourself to be harmed when in your home, so what’s a little more radiation?  We want to be able to say, “Yes!” and surprise the room.  Also, the more residents world-wide who have a land line, the more the-criminals-that-believe-they-be lose power over the masses to enslave them with the smart prison they are trying to establish.  If governments of the world can get the masses on a credit system, they can lock individuals out of using cell phones, having communication accessibility.  For that to work, first we need to be reliant on the cell phone.  We have to embrace all former ways of communication such as writing letters and using land lines.

“Do you use your phone for banking and financial transactions?” You want to be able to say, “No,” because you use your computer perhaps, but are involved with physical cash and knowing your teller at the local bank.  This will ensure humans will perhaps have a job tomorrow, but also makes it harder for governments to take cash from us.  They made banking convenient in order to enslave you in a smart system.  Doesn’t that make you mad?  The more cash that is used, the harder it is for you to be profiled.  Also, the more cash that is used, the less electronic currency is used, the harder it is to get us imprisoned with the credit system.  They want full control of your finances.  If they decide you are bad, they can decrease your worth and lock you out of travel, shopping, etc.  If we don’t go along quietly towards not having physical money, their credit system cannot succeed.  (Yes, I realize cash/money is not as good as the bartering or just freely giving style of long ago, but at least cash helps us to have some power.)

“How much time do you spend on your phone?”  Remember, they may be in a place to subpoena our records of usage to prove that we allow EMF’s into our lives willingly.  Wouldn’t it be astounding if the numbers of usage were low?  I for one would love to see their astonished faces.  I know it’s convenient to watch YouTube or search for information on a cell phone.  That’s why that was given to us: to get us hooked. By getting that weapon that they want to use against us out of our hands, we are taking a step at severing the cord that binds us to an enslaved future.  Likewise, leaving the phone at home or in an office or in a car instead of having it with us everywhere we go is taking back power.  They want to track you.  They want you in fear if you don’t have a cell phone with you.  When I mentioned leaving the cell phone at home, did you feel fear?  “But what if…?”  Remember, not too long ago, we traveled the world, interstate, to work and home without it.  How dare they get us thinking we need it.  Purchase a disposable camera.  Get away from your phone where you can.  Baby steps.

“Do you have a microwave oven in your home?”  If we can say no, we are proving that we don’t freely allow radiation into our homes.  “It is joined to the oven in the home I rent but it is unplugged and never used.”  “Nope.”  Those are two great answers.  There is research out there related to the harm the microwave does to your food, as well as to you in just having it plugged in.  I haven’t needed a microwave.  Not through being a full-time student, employee, mother and wife did I need it.  (The TV would be another emitter of radiation that at least could be unplugged when not in use if the home has one.  They might ask about this emitter to see your willingness to be exposed and use it against you.)

Getting rid of the smart meter is another battle.  Perhaps you can at least state it’s out of your control. Inpower.com had some suggestion of help awhile ago.  I don’t see why you can’t use the same approach that I am taking with the towers and 5G which we’ll briefly touch on shortly.  At the very worst, in the future if you have smart windows and doors, you may be locked in your house.  If you have a smart fridge, not only may you be locked out of it, but you may have too few credits to have it be cold, or some other aspect of control may be used against you.  By the way, the smart appliances hear you and assist spying and profiling.

For the hearing itself…and subsequent court hearings:

Plan on serving notice to the planning commission that you have a doctor’s note stating that the tower will be bad for your health (more in a subsequent blog about detail of this letter so you can get one too.)  Further, state that according to the California Code of Civil Procedure (527.6), Section b (2) “credible threat of violence,” (check code of your state) you will file a restraining order against (name) and those involved with the planning commissioner office, (name at the business that is wanting payment for a cell tower on the premises), and (name cell company) if they go ahead with placing you in fear for your life over assaulting you with EMF radiation by erecting that tower when you have already informed them about your doctor’s note and stance.

Soon I will get ideas for you regarding a strong letter from an MD.  This is called “objective” proof and is powerful.  “Subjective” proof is all they are used to seeing...you know, research from scientists.  For US citizens, we have to defeat Section 704 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act.

Here’s to hoping we can serve the world through saving our cities from 5G.

Bright Day Thoughts,

Paget Anne of Essendon


Saturday, May 18, 2019

Rebuttal to The Union’s, Vaccine Safety: The state of Vaccinations


A friend sent this article by way of, “See?  You are wrong to think vaccines aren’t safe.”  So, let me walk you through this propaganda.


This article is so full of misinformation and missing information, that I almost don’t even want to bother doing this much.  To start with, many of us who see vaccines for what they are figure there is a sinister reason Pan’s handler wants SB 276 passed.  The picture is of the educated trying to demonstrate how his reasoning for the medical exemption is fraudulent.  There truly is no problem.  When SB 277 was designed, one of the key players wanted the medical exemption left in place and now Pan is going back on his word.  He knew the future.  He knew the plan.  Let me tell you what it is.  They want SB 276 to pass so when they come for the adults within two years, you will have to get vaccines before you may renew your driver’s license in California unless you have a medical exemption…which they hope you won’t be able to get.  (Time to become living men, people! Get liberated from the system.)

Jenner was incompetent.  Go ahead.  Look into him and how his vaccine killed his child along with others.

So much to say about Wakefield, as well, so I will leave you with a link for starters.  Know this, a Big Pharma employee, such as doctors and trolls, always say this about Wakefield in their posts, articles, and when in their office.  They learn a line and it’s sheer nonsense.  Though I see him as pro-vax, he seemed decent when I met him in 2002.  He rightly linked the gut to autism.

Those who support vaccines always give credit for an infection’s decline to a vaccine.  Better nutrition, better waste removal and overall cleaner environments, higher percentage of populations with natural immunity, and less stress…for example being able to go out an enjoy the arts over full-time survival mode…all contributed to the decline of people succumbing to infections.  When your gut is strong and you have the right tools at your hands…not Western Medicine, which undermines health…your body can push back and do fine against a pathogen.  Sime infections have a natural rhythm of surfacing and then seemingly going dormant.

As far as I remember, the measles vaccine was available in 1962.  Not widely, but it was around.  How many in their statistic were vaccinated?  Atypical Measles is dangerous.  At least 33% of any outbreak of measles includes vaccinated.  Sometimes more as in the at least 38% of the Disneyland fiasco.

As for the quantity of vaccines being injected into children, there is not one single vaccine schedule that has been tested for safety.  They don’t know how all these vaccines interact with each other in a bloodstream, because no study against a saline-placebo group has ever been done.  No group has ever been followed for one year, five, ten after a decent study.  (How can they prove vaccine schedules safe when an individual vaccine hasn’t been deemed safe?  There’s a reason these tests haven’t been done.)

This is how they vote vaccines in

To what DeBusk said about testing the vaccine against a group that didn’t receive the vaccine…And do you realize the other group did not receive an inert saline placebo?  They received harmful adjuvants or the older version of the vaccine they are “testing,” which isn’t rigorous….
As for unethical to expose to a disease and give them a placebo, we have a whole group who has never been vaccinated that they could use by looking at their medical records as a separate test, but I’m sorry.  If you want to say something has been rigorously tested, you have to have a group who has not received a vaccine.  You are also testing safety along with efficacy.

They do finally admit that some vaccines shed, but hospitals know it is not rare for they warn recently vaccinated to stay away from their most compromised patients.

If vaccines were set against a true saline placebo, everyone would see the gut and neurological damage that vaccines cause.  That’s why they won’t do it.

Of course doctors want children vaccinated.  They get financial rewards when a certain percentage of their clientele have shots and tests.  Further, they know vaccine injuries are big business for them.  Until the client dies, they have a customer for life.  The conflict of interest makes them a group you cannot trust.

This is another element of a Big Pharma employee.  They don’t know…or simply lie blatantly…about what herd immunity is.  Herd immunity comes from the percentage of the population that has experienced the infection in question.  Now they cannot succumb again. It has nothing to do with vaccine rates.  How can it?  The MMR, for instance, only supposedly protects, though I would argue that point…against one genotype of measles.  That is hardly protection when someone who has experienced wild measles has protection against the gamut (24 genotypes).


The NVIC is your tax dollars.  It may seem like the government is paying for the slaughter of your children, but it’s those who purchase vaccines.

Man, the author made it sound so easy to claim your kid was injured by the vaccine.  It’s a difficult process.  Only a few actually win a settlement.

In 1986, it was well-known to those who wished to sue vaccine makers that they had legislation protecting them.  You can only sue if it’s something like a vial that had expired and was shipped out anyway.  That’s why lawsuits dropped dramatically.  It took two years to implement some kind of compensation because vaccine injury was so prevalent, they had to do something.  Also, the article fails to address that the vaccine makers threatened to stop making vaccines because they were losing too much in lawsuits.  That’s why Reagan gave them a free pass.

The bottom line is that if pharmaceutical companies were liable, they would test them for safety, which would mean that they would have to be made completely differently.  (You culture something on animal parts, viruses of unknow varieties will enter your product.  They will lead to problems in some hosts.  13.1 of the inserts attests to them knowingly not being safe.  They make it sound like they just haven’t gotten around to testing them.)  Kennedy’s family don’t know about this issue.
Dr. Alexander Langmuir, the father of infectious disease epidemiology at the CDC was not owned by Big Pharma. Research him.

I have the hard copy of this very long article.  It’s very good.


Important to the conversation of power behind harmful products.  (Also, know that glyphosate is in the animals used to culture your vaccines and has infiltrated the product itself.) A vaccine cannot be called GMO-free.)


Just so you know what’s going on.


and


I'm not convinced those two deaths were because of measles. One was a lady in 2015 who was diagnosed with measles post-mortem. They looked at her blood after she was dead and decided that even though she had been in hospital for pneumonia, she had measles. So, I think that was a lot of BS. The child who died in 2003, was on immune suppressants and it really seems to me that the doctor didn't want to hurt his reputation about what he was doing so they just said that that child had measles. Also diagnosed after death. If these two people had had measles it should have been on their charts when they were admitted into hospital. Or it should have been added to the charts before they died.

and


To give you an idea about doctors and Big Pharma


and


and


And propaganda now compared to 1988, when we did not fear measles.


On MMR


and


and


Vaccines and Autism


PLUS:


http://www.scribd.com/.../124-Research-Papers-Supporting...

Vaccines caused autism here in this federal court case http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/.../ABELL.ZELLER073008.pdf

And here page 2 http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/.../CAMPBELL-SMITH.MOJABI...

And here -

https://ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc...

Here are 83 cases reviewed by lawyers http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi...

Oh look here's a dead kid compensated https://ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc...

If you ever need a lawyer http://www.mctlawyers.com/vaccine-injury/cases/

Here are 127 separate studies linking vaccines and autism. https://www.scribd.com/.../124-Research-Papers-Supporting...

Read this about Hannah Brusewitz case and how she was harmed by DTP

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/09-152

Supreme Court Unavoidably Unsafe

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf

A dose-response relationship between organic mercury exposure from thimerosal-containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25198681

Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990-2010.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531966

Is infant immunization a risk factor for childhood asthma or allergy?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9345669

Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/

Infection, vaccines and other environmental triggers of autoimmunity.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16126512

DTP with or after measles vaccination is associated with increased in-hospital mortality in Guinea-Bissau.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17092614#

Measles outbreak in a vaccinated school population: epidemiology, chains of transmission and the role of vaccine failures.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1646939/

A positive association found between autism prevalence and childhood vaccination uptake across the U.S. population.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535

Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997-2002.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170

Abnormal measles-mumps-rubella antibodies and CNS autoimmunity in children with autism.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534

The plausibility of a role for mercury in the etiology of autism: a cellular perspective

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3173748/

Detection of RNA of Mumps Virus during an Outbreak in a Population with a High Level of Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccine Coverage

http://jcm.asm.org/content/46/3/1101.long

A case series of children with apparent mercury toxic encephalopathies manifesting with clinical symptoms of regressive autistic disorders.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560

Aluminum in the central nervous system (CNS): toxicity in humans and animals, vaccine adjuvants, and autoimmunity.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23609067

Unvaccinated Children are Healthier

http://www.mednat.org/vaccini/dannivacc_study.pdf

Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity

http://www.plosone.org/.../10.1371/journal.pone.0008382

Combination MMRV vaccine linked with 2-fold risk of seizures

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub.../2010-06/kp-cmv062310.php

Impact of environmental factors on the prevalence of autistic disorder after 1979

http://www.ms.academicjournals.org/.../article1409245960...

Increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infections associated with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22423139

Effectiveness of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in influenza-related hospitalization in children: a case-control study.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22525386

Speciation of methyl- and ethyl-mercury in hair of breastfed infants acutely exposed to thimerosal-containing vaccines.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21575620

Comparison of VAERS fetal-loss reports during three consecutive influenza seasons

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888271/

---------

FDA concludes vaccines cause Autism

http://www.getcancercure.com/fda-announce-that-dtap.../

..."the present study provides new epidemiological evidence supporting an association between increasing organic-Hg exposure from Thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines and the subsequent risk of an ASD diagnosis"...

.A two-phase study evaluating the relationship between…

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is defined by…

NCBI.NLM.NIH.GOV

US health?


MMR Safe?


Nurse speaks out


Parasites


Dr. Suzanne Humphries