Before I start,
I want to give you a Paget Anne of Essendon quote. “Questions are not necessarily attack.” We need to be able to teach that which we
think we know. Likewise, we need to be
able to answer questions related to that which we think we know when asked of
us. So what if someone asks from the wrong heart, with the intention of messing
us up. But what if a question causes us
to search for an answer and it prevents us from going to jail? Have we considered the angle which has been asked in the question before? Can answering this question be understood by
ourselves, satisfying our personal criteria, if not theirs?
In the link
below, the topic of US Nationals came up when Mike Gaddy was interviewed. He is a National. I’m certain he has not been toxinated as he
strikes me as not being under any spells.
He is a searcher of information.
All of this places him on the same side of the divide as me where
Genetic-humans are concerned.
The
following are my thoughts and included is some back and forth between Mike and
me.
When you file an affidavit
of citizenship evidence correcting your status from US Citizen to US National,
you are not asking anyone for permission to do so. You are leaving a paper trail to support you (in
the face of present-day tyranny), stating that you have not waived any Natural Rights, no matter the
unlawful words the opponents to mankind have placed on paper. The
criminals-that-believe-they-be have taken deciding who I am too far and have
made it obvious that they need to be stopped by other words on paper, by
lightning, by whatever means are available.
The affidavit is a nice start to physical avenues available to us at
this time.
Just a thought on the
affidavit (which is not a license nor a contract), but a truthful statement. Our opponent has many strange rules. They do
many nasty, unlawful things to us through having used disclosure and other
tools. I feel the affidavit works as an extension of disclosure to them.
Changing your status is
not the end. It is simply a step. For many, it’s the first step. Searching out how Common Law was dismantled
one psychopathic rule at a time and how each license you hold is a contract are
perhaps two other steps to take. This
physical reality responds to our personal history, too. We are energy. We are a MultiSelf that we either block from
our physical awareness completely or experience communications, depending on
our general alignment with the Sound of Self. This factor is also a step
towards or away from liberation. I
hold in consciousness that I can make agents of the government leave me
alone. This is a frequency thing. All humans need to stand responsibly on their
own two feet and do the same, embracing their experiences as they go.
When I have found myself
in a precarious or violent situation and seemed as a victim to others, there
was always something that those standing in judgement of me and the experiences
didn’t know. Moving on to other people’s
experiences, let’s understand that many events that made it to the news were
not generated how we have been led to believe.
The 1978 Guyana tragedy was reported in a certain light but seems obviously
a mind control experiment with authorities behind it. This is where the lay person really needs to
be aware and listening to prompts from Self.
You think a fellow is on the up-and-up, but don’t realize he is
controlled by those who are out to destroy mankind. The same goes for communes and other events. We do not know what we do not know about
them. Who can we trust? It is impossible to guess at all
the moving parts, but we know we don’t know something.
January
6th was so easy to see as a date that would live on in infamy. It takes a certain sort to go out there, with
their cell phones to broadcast where they are, where it’s beyond obvious to
know that hidden cells (mind controlled trouble-makers) and occurrences would
meet people of good faith. Of course, simply
having an affidavit on file with the Secretary of State is no defense against
the military/science/government/human faction. In fact, the affidavit might even be used
to profile and to target.
Sometime this year, I had
a back and forth with Mike Gaddy on Telegram (SFR). I like Mike.
I feel mankind is made up of individuals with differing opinions and
that is what makes us interesting. At one point, Mike wrote, “Believe
what you will. That is your prerogative. A recent decision by a federal judge
re a Person charged with crimes relating to the Jan 6 debacle in a bail hearing
told the person who had filed their bail request based on their ‘status’ stated
while denying the motion, ‘I don’t give a damn what your status is, petition is
denied.’” This comment left me sensing
the judge’s obvious impartiality from here.
This judge is obviously breaking every law in the book and the woman did
not know what to say in order to get the case to the Supreme Court.
I answered, “That is
interesting. Behaving like a national
seems necessary. I personally would make
it clear about jurisdiction, bail, pleading…pleading which you don’t do…and
walk as someone lawful, not just have a piece of paper. (How can a moral being, a living soul discuss
bail when common law currency is gold and silver?) How can this kind of ‘person’ get to a bail
hearing? It just goes to show that when
things ‘happen to us,’ there is something we don’t know. It is a good point that you make. It shows that a moral being needs to
internalize just what responsibility and not needing to be parented means.
Also, one needs to be
aware and not take a cell phone into places that may be a trap...and we can see
traps in many places. Sure, the paper
doesn't mean we do not have to think and be aware. Some people do look at it like they can do
whatever they want and not be accountable for their decisions. There is more than simply a paper.”
Another response of mine
was, “My position is that Lawful is real.
Illegal is fiction. Legal is
fiction. Both always have a way out of
their fiction because the truth is, they are not really there without the
energy and “life” that we give them. Since legal and illegal are both fictions,
the Lawful, always being there, may be accessed. It has nothing to do with the
opponent to humanity.
It is my position to walk
with life, liberty, property (including Rights) in mind when interfacing with
all lifestreams.
It is my position that in
this silly little game of wits that is before us that ‘outs’ are there. Becoming a ‘national’ with an affidavit is
just a small step and it is still in the legal fiction game. There are many roads to travel and if one
chooses to look at how I conduct my life as participating, supporting, being an
accessary to criminal acts, they may. I discern my actions differently.”
Mike wrote, “There are
many in prison today who believe the same. Good luck with your beliefs.”
I answered, “Yes, and
they have become our teachers,” even though I don’t know any with my beliefs.
Mike wrote, “I ask
again—!!! Is it your belief that acknowledging a criminal act by government by
filing a paper based on that crime makes
your action somehow legal as opposed to being an accessory to the crime?
All that rhetoric may
satisfy those who write it but I’m seeking an answer to a very simple question.
The government commits a
very egregious crime—you file a paper acknowledging the crime as acceptable—and
claim you have taken the high ground. Have a great day folks.”
I answered, “First of
all, I want to say that if I end up in jail, it means there was something I
didn't know. To me, that isn't the right question. But I do not know how to ask the right
question. I can see how a voter participates in fraud. I can see how if you use
a stamp to mail a letter, you are participating in the fraud. The question may be, how do we walk here in
the USA in 2022 without doing illegal things. Everything we do in this system
is illegal. Crime. It is a crime for us to use reserve notes,
but we do it. Your question feels heavy
with judgment when all of us would be guilty.
Self-serving entities
seek to ‘win,’ no matter if it does harm.
They always give a way out. I did
not make this fiction. It’s their
rules. Taking any step you can to call
them on it and get out is a start to stopping them.”
Mike responded, “Ask the
people who were at Waco or Ruby Ridge if status is important? When they rolled
up on site at Mount Carmel, did they ask for citizenship status of those inside?
Did they check the ‘status’ of Samuel Weaver before they shot him in the back?
Did they ascertain the ‘Status’ of Vicky Weaver before they shot her in the
face? Did they check status of the people in the Murrah building before they
blew it up? Did they check the ‘status’ of those people in the twin towers
before they set off their explosives?”
I did not inform Mike
that to me, this is the tyranny that has always been here. They do know about these people and why they
wish them dead. “Legal,” unlawful murders
are assassinations, and they are NEVER reported truthfully. Bad guys, such as Rumsfeld, are presented as good
guys and saviors to mankind are presented as troublemakers. If you become a national, you are consciously
stating No!!! If you are murdered, they
are breaking your Free Will more so than with a sleeper. If you become a national and get out of the
system and make it clear that they will enter into a contract with you with
certain behavior on their part, they will be in big trouble, even if it’s not
seen in this world.
On the warrior spirit discussed
in the link below, all humanity’s puppeteers know who those individuals are and
will have human puppets attack them. For
example, I was the sixth-grade student who, when it was my turn to lead, unlike
the others, I would pick the kid who was always chosen last somewhere near the
beginning-middle of choosing team players. When it came time to do the lineup, unlike all other leaders who placed themselves
first, I put myself last, with attempting to line the others up so as a strong
hitter could potentially have bases full before his turn. (This is sock-ball that I am
documenting.) Well, guess who got hit on the head by
Mr. Cleary’s fist with what he called, “Nobs,” the most. Guess who had this teacher growling at her in
power-hungry ways for most of the year.
Yes, me. The one with that trait
of true leadership who always catches the eye of what I call a damon. The opponent to humanity and to mankind does
not want to see a true leader in a position of power simply because this person
will not corrupt that power as they want. (And perhaps they don't want them educating prisoners, either.) I have integrity and am in alignment with the Sound of Self, so I have
been in many principal’s offices. Good
folks are seen as “bad guys” to our opponent because we can stop them. (Again, the affidavit is just one tool for the good guys.)
But you can’t stop them
if you only see the lie. And you can’t
get out until you see the lie.
Hear Mike’s excellent interview here.
https://speakfreeradio.com/2022/06/06/12/fact-hunter-013/
Goes to show you that you need to search before you
act. https://www.sethkaller.com/item/1622-30022.37-.40-&-30022.41-Hamilton%E2%80%99s-Assumption-Plan,-Passed-as-Four-Acts-of-Congress,-Plus-the-Residence-Act-Quid-pro-quo
