Time was spent off subject boasting
about “soon-to-be-abolished” vaccine exemptions in Australia and rates of
measles and whooping cough statistics.
(They do not mention that the measles vaccine sheds and causes Atypical
Measles, which is more dangerous than measles, nor do they mention that the
whooping cough vaccine causes whooping cough in people due to the vaccinated
person holding the disease in their throats, ready to spread easily.) Finally, the author gets back on track. The author is “administration.” Administration says that of the 486 parents
of Autistic kids, twenty percent of them decided not to vaccinate their younger
children. (They need to be clear if
these are 486 different families or if some are two parents of one child, just
so we can visualize the twenty percent accurately.) Next, Administration goes off on another
tangent to a vague study in Canada, looking at younger unvaccinated siblings of
Autistic children. Finally!!!! What Administration calls a study of 95,000
children is “an extensive private health insurance database of 95,727 children
born in the US” between 2001 and 2007 with one sibling “who was between 6
months and 17 years older.” Wow, that’s
a lot of children with autistic siblings!
Also, that’s a lot of medical information that was placed in a data base
when doctors were still using paper files.
Does that mean the doctors were scanning and filing information prior to
simply uploading it as they spoke to their patients? The reason I ask is because I requested my
daughter’s records from her doctor. It’s
a very thin file, yet I had to actually go in there and prove that there were
more records than what I had received.
Back before information was directly typed in, were all records truly uploaded?
So, the study was comparing Autistic siblings
and “the rate of exposure to the MMR vaccination.” There’s no mention if kids with amalgam
fillings were taken out of the study in order to take out that kind of
mercury-induced neurological activity.
(I saw a 3-year-old special education kid with mercury in her mouth last
June. Yes, some criminals still practice
dentistry this way.) At one point, Administration
says that there is a link between siblings with Autism and a lowered
vaccination rate, yet they do not specify if the MMR shot was given or
not. (Thompson, the CDC whistleblower, says that
the link between Autism and vaccines that the CDC studied and proved was with
the MMR shot specifically.)
Administration gets down right confusing
when they say that out of these 95, 727 children, 1,929 had an older sibling
with Autism.” I thought all siblings had
to have Autism and to be older! Administration says that 1.04% of the siblings
had Autism as a diagnosis in the follow-up, but Administration does not clarify
what “follow-up” means. They are simply
looking at records. By the way, near the
end of that paragraph, they are giving percentages of kids with Autism, but they
definitely are now stating that some older siblings either have or don’t have
Autism in complete contrast to the opening statement about this so-called
study. They finally give the percentages
about the MMR vaccination in siblings without Autism. Thompson and the CDC found that the MMR shot
really is more likely to cause Autism when given when young. Here, 84% of kids with older siblings without
Autism and 73% of kids of siblings with Autism did not have Autism with the MMR
given at 2-years-old. No races were
listed and the CDC specifically said that black boys were more susceptible. For children receiving the MMR shot at 5, the
rate of no Autism was 92% and 86%. Again,
no races were mentioned. In 1999, 2001, and
2004, the MMR was recommended between 12 and 15 and 4 to 6 years old. But, by 2006, the 12 to 15 months was the
same, but the second administration was changed to include 11 to 18 year olds. Perhaps this is why Jain’s “study” only
looked until 2007, since 2-year-olds in the “study” would have been born in
2005. Even some of the kids who had it
twice, might not have had their second shot, yet. Administration talks about the current
guidelines, but the vaccine schedule has changed many times since 2007.
According to Administration, this study
is also not studying uninsured, clinic users…namely the poorer aspects of our society,
yet they say their findings are consistent with other studies. The CDC and Wakefield are two endeavors that
disagree with the idea that Autism and MMR have no link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8EtfkAngKw
and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ra0QtTUuFIc.
Administration didn’t state if the
children actually did receive the MMR vaccine twice or not. They simply looked at kids at 2 and at
5. Again, they didn’t say all absolutely received the MMR
twice. They did say that this test
looked at Autism and the “lowered rate of vaccination” while saying that they
are looking at the MMR! That is vague
enough to mean that some of these kids only had the MMR shot once. They assume the 2-year-olds had the MMR once
and that by 5, they have had the MMR twice, because “parents are currently
advised to vaccinate children twice for MMR between birth and the age of five.” Administration is trying to drive home that
Autism must be a genetic thing since Autism rates increase within one family
and “they were under-vaccinated.” Again,
at least Administrations interpretation of the study, “under” is never defined.
Administration goes off the results and
proofs associated with this study again to discuss a 2004, a 2011, and a few papers
examinations of a lack of a link between Autism and the MMR shot. Administration is downright crazy saying that
mercury is safe and shows their true colors, that Administration is indeed a
troll, when they say that it’s “not the evidence anti-vaccers are looking for.” The word anti-vaxxers is used by trolls. They are into name calling. Many of those parents who trolls call “anti-vaxxers”
are actually parents of vaccine injured kids, so it’s strange for trolls to get
on their high-horse to people who once believed in the product trolls are
peddling.
This is a study http://app.wcct.com/healthy-volunteer-study-12-18-15?=Adwords&gclid=CPb15saq-8oCFQEdaQodQIYMQA
. It uses live people and compensates
them.
Everything I just wrote was a reaction
to the article with the provided link herehttp://personalhealthrecords.in/2016/02/15/study-of-95000-children-finds-no-link-between-mmr-vaccines-and-autism/. It is very different from the actual study of
April 2015. You won’t believe how many
differences there are. Check it
out. http://www.lewin.com/publications/publication/201504210462.html. So why did Administration feel lying or
misrepresentation was necessary?
At any rate, Autism and the MMR has been studied by the CDC themselves. In 2015, Jain knew what the CDC had done http://healthimpactnews.com/2015/will-cdc-whistleblower-on-vaccines-testify-before-congress/, http://www.whale.to/v/rapp.html, http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4546421/rep-bill-posey-calling-investigation-cdcs-mmr-reasearch-fraud, http://truthinmedia.com/cdc-vaccines-autism-coverup/, and uploaded in 2008 when Julie, the official, knew the truth about the MMR and Autism link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dh-nkD5LSIg&feature=youtu.be.
No matter what the details were regarding the true study conducted in 2015, a troll reported on it in 2016. They will continue to sell vaccines as safe and effective until Agenda 21 has us locked up in controlled districts.
No comments:
Post a Comment