What would a true vaccination
study look like if it were a reality? Let’s
look at a pretend investigation for three shots in one called the MMR to answer
this question. First, all humans
involved with the study on the “science” side shouldn’t have to sign a
gag-contract. They should be able to
publish their findings, to freely talk about the process, and to show results,
as long as no names of the children are released. These scientists should be impartial. Next, there would be two equally divided groups
of children. The testers wouldn’t know
which group the recipient of the MMR was or which was the control group. Most importantly, at the commencement of the
study, there would be 100+ three-year-olds called upon who had never received a
single vaccine in their whole lives, nor the synthetic vitamin K shot at birth. Further, their mothers would have received no
vaccines during pregnancy and had no amalgam fillings in their mouths during
pregnancy or while breastfeeding. (This
last requirement is due to the possible ten percent exposure of mercury to the offspring.)
In a perfect world, the
mothers would be able to trust the ones preparing the two shots and know that
at least one group would be receiving a saline solution in a shot and that the
other would be only receiving the MMR. These
two groups would receive no other shots while being carefully followed for at
least fifteen years. Since all races
would be represented in both groups, it would be easy for testers to document
differences.
In reality, the pro-vaxx mothers
would have already allowed so many vaccines by age three that it would be
difficult to find non-vaxxed children of mothers who are willing to allow their
children to possibly receive the MMR.
Further, these mothers would insist on their children receiving all the
vaccines available out there, not just possibly the MMR, while those mothers who
have researched and have chosen to not have their children vaccinated would
never permit their children to be in a study where they might receive the
MMR. The mothers of non-vaxxed children
would say there is proof enough that the MMR is not safe by the comparisons they
already see. My adult non-vaccinated
child, for instance, doesn’t need an emotional support animal, has never been
admitted into hospital (yet alone within her first two-years of life like so
many children this past decade), has never had an ear ache (yet alone ear
infections that may lead to tubes and deafness), has never suffered from
eczema, asthma, allergies, or auto-immune diseases that have plagued countless
vaccinated elementary school-aged children.
Could it be that because pharmaceutical
companies cannot be sued (thanks to legislation) that the rich CEO’s are happy
to get away without conducting true studies that they know will fail? No testing like what I’ve suggested has ever
happened for any vaccine, yet doctors can make a profit if certain age groups in
their practices receive certain vaccines.
This should be reason enough for vaccines to not be permitted on the
market, yet alone mandated.
Why aren’t pro-vaxx
parents who say they love science not clamoring for science? True
science is testing two groups where only one variable is different. The reality behind no true testing for vaccines is that the propaganda machine has
been so effective and profitable that they simply don’t need to.
