This is all an act,
just as it says. There is no way silly
words on paper may decide that it’s acceptable to abuse you.
“SEC. 704. FACILITIES
SITING; RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSION STANDARDS.
(a) National Wireless Telecommunications
Siting Policy.--Section
332(c) (47 U.S.C.
332(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following
new paragraph:
``(7) Preservation of local zoning
authority.--
``(A) General
authority.--Except as provided in this
paragraph, nothing in this Act
shall limit or affect the
authority of a State or local
government or
instrumentality thereof over
decisions regarding the
placement, construction, and
modification of personal
wireless service facilities.”
First of all, it is
possible that State when capitalized means one state of the states of the union
that are not under District of Columbia rule.
One would expect state to be lower cased in this sentence. This local government here where I am is California
legislation, which falls under the District of Columbia rule. Also, what do the ‘ ‘ In front of the 7 and B
mean? Are they simply quotes? Why then?
“``(B) Limitations.--
``(i) The regulation
of the placement,
construction, and
modification of personal
wireless service
facilities by any State or local
government or
instrumentality thereof—"
Again, State and local
government may be addressing the two realities here in all 50 states.
“``(ii) A State or local government or
instrumentality thereof shall act on any request
for authorization to place, construct, or modify
personal wireless service facilities within a
reasonable period of time after the request is
duly filed with such government or
instrumentality, taking into account the nature
and scope of such request.” (Bold type is mine.)
This may prove my point about states of the union being mentioned with a capital S in states.
No-one would file anything with them.
They are the liberated aspect of each state. You would never file with them about anything.
“``(iii) <> Any decision by a
State or local government or instrumentality
thereof to deny a request to place, construct, or
modify personal wireless service facilities shall
be in writing and supported by substantial
evidence contained in a written record.”
Yet, in the next paragraph, they are mentioned again.
``(iv) No State or local government or
instrumentality thereof may regulate the
placement, construction, and modification of
personal wireless service facilities on the basis
of the environmental effects of radio frequency
emissions to the extent that such facilities
comply with the Commission's regulations
concerning such emissions.
States of the union are not obligated to follow criminal legislation from the District of Columbia.
“``(v) Any person
adversely affected by any
final action or failure
to act by a State or local
government or any
instrumentality thereof that is
inconsistent with this
subparagraph may, within 30
days after such action or
failure to act, commence
an action in any court of
competent
jurisdiction.
<>”
The Judicial District
may be different than the courts of the District of Columbia. I need to learn what “<> means.” A competent
court may be the court of fiction, which truly is not competent. This is speaking to the wronged cell phone
company or such, not to an average human.
“Any person adversely affected by an act or failure
to act by a State or local government or any
instrumentality thereof that is inconsistent with
clause (iv) may petition the Commission for
relief.”
Among other definitions that you may expect is, “A warrant or authority or letters patent,
issuing from the government, or one of its departments” (Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Ed., p. 141).
Letters is defined as “A commission, patent, or written instrument” (Black’s Law, p. 469).
Keep in mind, no words were defined in this document, except what I will soon quote.
Basically, is business being admitted here; the idea of not allowing people to stop cell towers
and 5G antennas from being built? A cell company victim can waa waa cry to the patent itself for help?
“``(C) Definitions.--For purposes of this paragraph--
``(i) the term `personal wireless services'
means commercial mobile services, unlicensed
wireless services, and common carrier wireless
exchange access services;
``(ii) the term `personal wireless service
facilities' means facilities for the provision of
personal wireless services; and
``(iii) the term `unlicensed wireless service'
means the offering of telecommunications services
using duly authorized devices which do not require
individual licenses, but does not mean the
provision of direct-to-home satellite services (as
defined in section 303(v)).''.”
Interesting, so the 5G satellite fence around Earth cannot be used? If those quote-looking things
are quotes, then why? And why is that last one done like this .”. ?
I don’t know much, but I know all things such as colons, spaces, and dots have meanings.
“(b) <> Radio Frequency Emissions.--Within 180 days
after the enactment of this Act, the Commission shall complete action in
ET Docket 93-62 to prescribe and make effective rules regarding the
environmental effects of radio frequency emissions.”
I wonder what rules they made. Only try to kill 45% of the bees. Only try to kill 66% of humans.
“(c) <> Availability of
Property.--Within 180 days of the enactment of this Act, the President
or his designee shall prescribe procedures by which Federal departments
and agencies may make available on a fair, reasonable, and
nondiscriminatory basis, property, rights-of-way, and easements under
their control for the placement of new telecommunications services that
are dependent, in whole or in part, upon the utilization of Federal
spectrum rights for the transmission or reception of such services.”
It’s interesting to me that they worry about being fair and reasonable and that they
don’t discriminate against those who may want the tower on their property, because money is involved. But they don’t care about their health or yours.
The text against humanity is available at this link.
