The following is from a case Gordon v. State March 20, 1985 https://casetext.com/case/gordon-v-state-502/.
“It is well settled that the United States Constitution protects an
individual's right to travel, although it is not always clear which
constitutional provision affords the protection. See Califano v. Aznavorian, 439 U.S. 170, 99 S.Ct. 471, 58 L.Ed.2d 435 (1978); Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 78 S.Ct. 1113, 2 L.Ed.2d 1204 (1958); Crandall v. Nevada, 6 Wall. 35, 18 L.Ed. 744 (1858). The Idaho Supreme Court
has held that a particular mode of transportation — the operation of a motor
vehicle upon public streets and highways — is also a right protected by the
federal and state constitutions. Adams v. City of Pocatello, 91 Idaho 99, 416 P.2d 46 (1966). Other jurisdictions considering
the issue have declared the right to travel on public highways to be a
privilege, not a constitutional right. E.g., Standish v. Department of Revenue, M.V.D., 235 Kan. 900, 683 P.2d 1276 (1984); Crocker v. Colorado Department
of Revenue, 652 P.2d 1067 (Colo. 1982). Whether it is termed a right
or a privilege, an individual's ability to travel on public highways is
"subject to reasonable regulation by the state in the exercise of its police
power." Adams v. City of Pocatello, 91 Idaho at 101, 416 P.2d at 48. See Noe v. Dolan, 197 Colo. 32, 589 P.2d 483 (1979); Popp v. Motor Vehicle
Department, 211 Kan. 763, 508 P.2d 991 (1973).”
The part that I put in bold is because I want you to see it clearly. Free travel, the Right of locomotion is not a privilege. Privileges come with the public official’s Office. It’s not for us private people. If we join their Game, then perhaps privileges come into play, but that has nothing to do with our Rights/Duties. If humans could bring themselves up to the standards of mankind, we would not need agents of the government, who are most likely human over being mankind. (Think of police that rape, kill and steal. That’s a human. Mankind don’t behave like that. It’s all about frequency.)
Respect life, liberty (which includes freedom of movement), and Property
(which includes Rights) of yourself and others. Bam. Done. No need to be
parented. Govern your own little self.
I made “police power” bold because this is a made-up thing. All Law (words on paper before legalese’ statutes, ordinances and policies) discussed militias, but not police as we know them today. Police was also vocalized as policy. See
https://chasnqi.blogspot.com/2022/08/ideas-on-law-and-court-procedure.html
“We have already determined the insurance requirement of the MVSRA to
be a permissible exercise of the state's police power. State v. Reed, 107 Idaho 62, 686 P.2d 842 (Ct.App. 1984). Gordon argues not that his
conviction for failing to exhibit proof of insurance is unconstitutional, but
that requiring him to insure his automobile is unconstitutional.”
This police power was made up. It is unlawful.
“Public safety” is so misunderstood. First of all, “public” is officials.
Individuals are private. And as for “safety”—the opponent to mankind’s key
phrase for control—you as a lawful being should respect another’s Right
to life, liberty and property so statutes, bullying ordinances and policies are
strictly for officials to keep them in line, not for you. Further, if we follow
this Natural Law, then we don’t even need a certificate of competency because
we would not operate an auto if we knew we couldn’t. (And if we’re out of our
minds and don’t know it, those around us would surely intervene, even if it
ended up being a stranger.)
“Although removing the lien placed on a mortgaged vehicle arguably
elevates one to a new level of freedom, we do not believe the state or federal
constitution exempts the "freeman" from the regulations imposed
here through the state's legitimate use of its police power. The
constitutional right to travel does not "destroy the independent power of
each State under our Constitution to enact laws uniformly applicable to all of
its residents." Califano v. Torres, 435 U.S. 1, 4-5, 98 S.Ct. 906, 908, 55 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978). See also Salibra v. Supreme Court of Ohio, 730 F.2d 1059 (6th Cir. 1984).”
Sorry, but you cannot have “freeman,” implying a liberated individual
and “police power,” which is made-up oppression against humans and mankind in
this sentence…nor legitimate and police power, which is illegitimate. It makes
no sense. Of course, a Freeman would be exempt to bondservant, slave, serf
mentality, oppression and rules! Dah!!!
Please tread carefully. Here on 3D Earth 2022 the officials are
puppets to that which is against mankind. You better know the Game they play if
you want to demonstrate your Right to be liberated. For example, the Draco see
you as food, so know where you stand on their list of resources. Also, be a
frequency to establish a Space of Love and to be able to transmute the attacks
that will be slung at you.
Know that you are aligned with the Sound of Self prior to aggressively, even assertively, challenging them.
For more information on opponents to mankind, the Genetic human, the light-bearer human (mankind) and techniques to assist mankind, please see my book Interdimensional Disturbances Access Denied.
For inspiring, supportive books for this time, please see
https://pagetanneofessendon.com/recommended-reading-1
9/7/2022 added (Free exercise and enjoyment of Rights)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1qSC1uKwyw
No comments:
Post a Comment