Thursday, April 23, 2015

SB 277 Revised

Amended  IN  Senate  April 22, 2015
Amended  IN  Senate  April 09, 2015


CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2015–2016 REGULAR SESSION


Senate Bill No. 277



Introduced by Senators Pan and Allen
(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Gonzalez)
(Coauthors: Senators Beall, Block, De León, Hall, Hertzberg, Hill, Jackson, Leno, McGuire, Mitchell, Stone, Wieckowski, and Wolk)
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Baker, Chiu, Cooper, Low, McCarty, Nazarian, Rendon, Mark Stone, and Wood)

February 19, 2015



An act to add Section 48980.5 to the Education Code, and to amend Sections 120325, 120335, and 120370 of, and to repeal Section 120365 of, the Health and Safety Code, relating to public health.



LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST



SB 277, as amended, Pan. Public health: vaccinations.

(1) Existing law prohibits the governing authority of a school or other institution from unconditionally admitting any person as a pupil of any public or private elementary or secondary school, child care center, day nursery, nursery school, family day care home, or development center, unless prior to his or her admission to that institution he or she has been fully immunized against various diseases, including measles, mumps, and pertussis, subject to any specific age criteria. Existing law authorizes an exemption from those provisions for medical reasons or because of personal beliefs, if specified forms are submitted to the governing authority. Existing law requires the governing authority of a school or other institution to require documentary proof of each entrant’s immunization status. Existing law authorizes the governing authority of a school or other institution to temporarily exclude a child from the school or institution if the authority has good cause to believe that the child has been exposed to one of those diseases, as specified.

This bill would eliminate the exemption from immunization based upon personal beliefs. This bill would except pupils in a home-based private school and students enrolled in an independent study pursuant to specified law from the prohibition described above of all of the school’s pupils are residents of the household or are members of a single family. above. The bill would narrow the authorization for temporary exclusion to make it applicable only to a child whose documentary proof of immunization status does not show proof of immunization against one of the diseases described above. The bill would make conforming changes to related provisions.
(2) Existing law requires the governing board of a school district, at the beginning of the first semester or quarter of the regular school term, to make certain notifications to parents or guardians of minor pupils including, among others, specified rights and responsibilities of a parent or guardian and specified school district policies and procedures.
This bill would require the governing board of a school district to also include in the notifications provided to parents or guardians of minor pupils at the beginning of the regular school term the immunization rates for the school in which a pupil is enrolled for each required immunization. By requiring school districts to notify parents or guardians of school immunization rates, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.


Vote: MAJORITY   Appropriation: NO   Fiscal Committee: YES   Local Program: YES  



The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1.

 Section 48980.5 is added to the Education Code, to read:
48980.5.
 The notification required pursuant to Section 48980 shall also include the immunization rates for the school in which a pupil is enrolled for each of the immunizations required pursuant to Section 120335 of the Health and Safety Code.

SEC. 2.

 Section 120325 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
120325.
 In enacting this chapter, but excluding Section 120380, and in enacting Sections 120400, 120405, 120410, and 120415, it is the intent of the Legislature to provide:
(a) A means for the eventual achievement of total immunization of appropriate age groups against the following childhood diseases:
(1) Diphtheria.
(2) Hepatitis B.
(3) Haemophilus influenzae type b.
(4) Measles.
(5) Mumps.
(6) Pertussis (whooping cough).
(7) Poliomyelitis.
(8) Rubella.
(9) Tetanus.
(10) Varicella (chickenpox).
(11) Any other disease deemed appropriate by the department, taking into consideration the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Academy of Family Physicians.
(b) That the persons required to be immunized be allowed to obtain immunizations from whatever medical source they so desire, subject only to the condition that the immunization be performed in accordance with the regulations of the department and that a record of the immunization is made in accordance with the regulations.
(c) Exemptions from immunization for medical reasons.
(d) For the keeping of adequate records of immunization so that health departments, schools, and other institutions, parents or guardians, and the persons immunized will be able to ascertain that a child is fully or only partially immunized, and so that appropriate public agencies will be able to ascertain the immunization needs of groups of children in schools or other institutions.
(e) Incentives to public health authorities to design innovative and creative programs that will promote and achieve full and timely immunization of children.

SEC. 3.

 Section 120335 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
120335.
 (a) As used in this chapter, “governing authority” means the governing board of each school district or the authority of each other private or public institution responsible for the operation and control of the institution or the principal or administrator of each school or institution.
(b) The governing authority shall not unconditionally admit any person as a pupil of any private or public elementary or secondary school, child care center, day nursery, nursery school, family day care home, or development center, unless, prior to his or her first admission to that institution, he or she has been fully immunized. This subdivision does not apply to a pupil in a home-based private school if all of the pupils are residents of the household or are members of a single family. or a pupil who is enrolled in an independent study pursuant to Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 51745) of Chapter 5 of Part 28 of the Education Code. The following are the diseases for which immunizations shall be documented:
(1) Diphtheria.
(2) Haemophilus influenzae type b.
(3) Measles.
(4) Mumps.
(5) Pertussis (whooping cough).
(6) Poliomyelitis.
(7) Rubella.
(8) Tetanus.
(9) Hepatitis B.
(10) Varicella (chickenpox).
(11) Any other disease deemed appropriate by the department, taking into consideration the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Academy of Family Physicians.
(c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), full immunization against hepatitis B shall not be a condition by which the governing authority shall admit or advance any pupil to the 7th grade level of any private or public elementary or secondary school.
(d) The governing authority shall not unconditionally admit or advance any pupil to the 7th grade level of any private or public elementary or secondary school unless the pupil has been fully immunized against pertussis, including all pertussis boosters appropriate for the pupil’s age.
(e) The department may specify the immunizing agents that may be utilized and the manner in which immunizations are administered.

(f)This section shall become operative on July 1, 2012.

SEC. 4.

 Section 120365 of the Health and Safety Code is repealed.

SEC. 5.

 Section 120370 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
120370.
 (a) If the parent or guardian files with the governing authority a written statement by a licensed physician to the effect that the physical condition of the child is such, or medical circumstances relating to the child are such, that immunization is not considered safe, indicating the specific nature and probable duration of the medical condition or circumstances that contraindicate immunization, that child shall be exempt from the requirements of Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 120325, but excluding Section 120380) and Sections 120400, 120405, 120410, and 120415 to the extent indicated by the physician’s statement.
(b) When there is good cause to believe that a child whose documentary proof of immunization status does not show proof of immunization against a communicable disease listed in subdivision (b) of Section 120335 has been exposed to one of those diseases, that child may be temporarily excluded from the school or institution until the local health officer is satisfied that the child is no longer at risk of developing or transmitting the disease.

SEC. 6.

 If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division"
 

My question is...how come there's a part that talks about this document becoming operative on July 1, 2012 when Pan presented it on February 19, 2015?  Did he have the document waiting for the right time?    Did he know the public would have to be frightened into allowing us to be governed into giving up our rights to choose our medical procedures for ourselves?  Were the right circumstances made to happen?

 

Letter to Each Senator to vote in April


Dear Ms. Jackson,

I am writing to ask you to vote no on SB 277.  If you are considering voting yes, I invite you to listen to me.

SB 277:

★ Removes California’s citizen’s right to a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) It is inappropriate to establish legislation that forces us to educate our children and then turns around and makes it conditional.

★ Under the Individuals with Disabilities Act, students are guaranteed a Free and Appropriate Public Education to carry out their Individual Education Plan (IEP) until the age of 22

★ Violates medical ethics, (as written in Opinion 8.08 of the American Medical Association).  How is it ethical for the leaders of California to force us to have medical procedures?  Whether you have studied medicine or not, I did not hire you to make my medical decisions for me.

★ Segregation issue: SB277 will segregate an entire class of children which is unconstitutional, especially since there are protections in place for students with HIV and HepB. To separate is inherently not equal (Brown v. Board of Education).  The camps made for Jews and non-Nazis comes to mind.  If you vote yes on SB 277, you are supporting dividing the population.

★ Violates the "equal protection clause" of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

★ Removes freedom of religion, (as declared by the California Constitution Declaration of Rights, Article 1, Section 4).  I would appreciate believing I am free to choose whether I place crap in my temple (body), or not.  It is not for SB 277 to decide, thank-you very much!

I live in California; therefore, your vote matters to me.  Please support our freedom to choose our own medical procedures. 

Thank-you.

Bright Day Thoughts,

Debbie Allsup

SB 277 Threatens to Revoke Rights to Make Medical Choices

The following is from http://www.sb277.org/

The Education hearing
possibly the LARGEST turn out of opposition in Legislative History over 800 voiced public opposition
April 15, 2015 (view recorded meeting)
Due to an overwhelming amount of unanswered questions by the Senate and lack of answers by the bill's authors vote was postponed until
Wednesday, April 22, at 9 AM

The Bill passed the committee with 2 amendments and many Senator's concerns unaddressed. Vote of 7 yes and 2 no.
Noes were 
Sharon Runner R-Lancaster
& Connie Leyva, D-Chino


Mark your calendar for next week's Judiciary Hearing at 1:30pm Tues
April 28th.

★ ACTION PLAN ★
 We need to point out the issues with this bill as amended

1. Please start formulating your letters and send them off via fax or email to the Senate Judiciary Committee members. Please ONLY CALL if you are a CONSTITUENT of that senator. All contact information is below.

Some points to hit on in your letters:

★ Segregation issue: SB277 will segregate an entire class of children which is unconstitutional, especially since there are protections in place for students with HIV and HepB. Separate is inherently not equal (Brown v. Board of Education).
★ Removes our right to a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
★ Violates medical ethics, (as written in Opinion 8.08 of the American Medical Association).
★ Removes freedom of religion, (as declared by the California Constitution Declaration of Rights, Article 1, Section 4).
★ Under the Individuals with Disabilities Act, students are guaranteed a Free and Appropriate Public Education to carry out their Individual Education Plan (IEP) until the age of 22
★ Violates the "equal protection clause" of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.


EMAIL - SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
(copy the list and paste to BCC field of your email for a quick and easy batch email)

Senator.Jackson@senate.ca.gov,
Senator.Moorlach@senate.ca.gov,
Senator.Anderson@senate.ca.gov,
Senator.Hertzberg@senate.ca.gov,
Senator.Leno@senate.ca.gov,
Senator.Monning@senate.ca.gov,
Senator.Wieckowski@senate.ca.gov


FAX – Please only send your fax one time.
Senator Jackson – (916) 651-4919
Senator Moorlach – (916) 651-4937
Senator Anderson – (916) 651-4938
Senator Hertzberg – (916) 651-4918
Senator Leno – (916) 651-4911
Senator Monning – (916) 651-4917
Senator Wieckowski – (916) 651-4910


PHONE (only if you are their constituent)
Senator Jackson – (916) 651-4019
Senator Moorlach – (916) 651-4037
Senator Anderson – (916) 651-4038
Senator Hertzberg – (916) 651-4018
Senator Leno – (916) 651-4011
Senator Monning – (916) 651-4017
Senator Wieckowski – (916) 651-4010


2. MEETING WITH SENATORS:
Coordinate with your Senator's office to meet and dicuss your concerns. 


3.
Keep community outreach in the forefront of your mind. Canvassing at the weekend farmer's markets, peaceful protests, hosting an informational gathering with colleagues or in your mommy group, reaching out to your school's administrators...etc. Community outreach falls on each of us. At the very least, share this website with others
 SB277.ORG








 


 

The Senate Educational Committe's Votes

 BIT OF TRIVA
April 15 Education committee hearing public comments:
6 minutes SUPPORT: 47 adults with 18 groups represented

2.5 hours OPPOSITION: 623 adults, 134 children and 31 groups represented. 






Here is how the Senate Education Committee voted on Senate Bill 277:

Richard Pan, D-Sacramento Y

Carol Liu, D-La Cañada Flintridge Y

Bill Monning, D-Carmel Y

Andy Vidak, R-Hanford Y

Tony Mendoza, D-Artesia Y

Connie Leyva, D-Chino N

Marty Block, D-San Diego Y

Sharon Runner, R-Lancaster N

Loni Hancock, D-Berkeley Y


Thank-you to Connie Leyva and Sharon Runner for voting no to mandatory medical procedures.  If SB277 is signed into law, how is the Californian Government any better than Nazis forcing medical procedures on Jews and non-Nazis?  These yes voters need to step down.  They are not representing the public who does not wish to be enslaved.

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article19227906.html#storylink=cpy

Anti-Vaxxers to be Punished

Debbie Allsup in pink.  Stephen Lutz in blue.

Australia To Cut Welfare Payments

For Anti-Vaxxers

April 13, 2015 | by Stephen Luntz
 
 
The Australian government will tighten the rules requiring children to be vaccinated in order for parents to receive welfare payments and childcare subsidies.
Current Australia law states that children must be vaccinated if their parents are to get the Family Tax Benefit A and rebates for childcare costs. However, exemptions are allowed under three circumstances: medical grounds that make a child at increased risk of unusual reaction, religious opposition or other “personal objections.”
The new rules would remove the last option, while still allowing exceptions on religious and medical grounds. The proposal has the support of the Labor opposition, guaranteeing it passage through both houses of parliament.
As in other developed countries, Australia has experienced outbreaks of diseases such as measles and whooping cough that were once controlled or eliminated entirely as a result of increasing numbers of parents choosing not to vaccinate their children. 

(In America, at least, increases in whooping cough were not because of unvaccinated children.  I say this because a huge number of kids who had whooping cough had been vaccinated.  Rather than blaming unvaccinated kids, why not test the crap that rains down on us from chem trails!  Why not ask yourself, "Who gains when legislation is put in place to take away people's rights?")


"The choice made by families not to immunize their children is not supported by public policy or medical research,...
(Not true.  The research has been done and the results are out there.  For example:
"Dr Viera Scheibner is Principal Research Scientist (Retired) with a doctorate in Natural Sciences from Comenius University in Bratislava. After an eminent scientific career in micropalaeontology during which she published 3 books and some 90 scientific papers in refereed scientific journals in Australia and overseas, she studied babies’ breathing patterns with the Cotwatch breathing monitor developed by her late husband Leif Karlsson in the mid 1980s. Babies had alarms after vaccination, indicating stress. This introduced her to the subject of vaccination. She then started systematically studying orthodox medical papers dealing with vaccination issues. To this day she has collected and studied more than 100000 pages of medical papers.

Despite such extensive research of orthodox medical papers published on vaccines over the past 100 years, she established that there is no scientific evidence that these injections of highly noxious substances prevent diseases, quite to the contrary, that they increase susceptibility to the diseases which the vaccines are supposed to prevent and also to a host of related and unrelated viral and bacterial infections. Vaccines are involved in a great number of modern ills of childhood such as immunoreactive diseases (asthma, allergies), autoimmune diseases (diabetes, multiple sclerosis, lupus erythematosis), cancers, leukaemia, degenerative diseases of bone and cartilage, behavioural and learning problems, to mention just the most important conditions.

Her research into vaccination has culminated so far in two books and a number of shorter and longer individual papers published in a variety of scientific and medical publications. She has also conducted frequent international lecture tours to present the results of her research to parents, health and medical professionals and anyone else who is interested. She has also provided a great number of expert witness reports for court cases relating to deaths and injuries caused by vaccines, such as so-called “shaken baby” syndrome."  See what I mean?  The problem is that Abbott wasn't handed a paper with these words on it.  Like the general public, he only knows what he's told.)
...nor should such action be supported by taxpayers in the form of childcare payments,” Prime Minister Tony Abbott and
Social Services Minister Scott Morrison said in a joint statement. 
(Why?  What action should not be supported by taxpayers, the right to choose not to put crap in your child's bloodstream?  Abbott is showing his true colors here.  He doesn't like supporting freedom of thought.  He is speaking for Australians.  Maybe they like supporting freedom of thought.)
While the proposal has been welcomed by the Australian Medical Association and parental lobby groups, it has attracted criticism even from some vaccination supporters.

(Because the issue isn't about whether to vaccinate or not.  The issue is freedom of choice.  The more insane legislation the Australian public allows the government to sign into law, the easier it will be for other countries to do the same and the more
legislation the Australian government can implement on them, et cetera.) 
It has been noted that users of the conscientious objection clause
tend to be wealthy, and therefore less likely to be swayed
 by the loss of a means-tested welfare benefit. 
(Swayed means manipulated in this article.  It is unfair and therefore against the Australian citizen's rights to be forced to do something that they know is wrong.  Rather than wealthy, I'd say educated.  If the educated happen to have more money, fine, but that is not always the case.  At any rate, people who have spent years investigating this subject and therefore are educated on this subject, will absolutely NEVER allow this crap to be injected into their wee ones system.  How insane is it to force a family to hurt their children or no food will be on the table tonight.  When the wealthy won't budge, what kind of legislation will they come up with next?  A tax on all private helicopter rides?  A tax on maid service?  When will they stop, ever?)


The current Australian government's
record of hostility to science, demonstrated across many fields, has created suspicion about their motivation, particularly since the announcement coincides with moves to restrict welfare for other reasons. 

(Particularly.  The public are screwed no matter what you believe about vaccines.  Is it time to ask them to step down, yet?)

The conscientious objector clause has been used by less than 2% of parents in the last year. Another 6% of children are not vaccinated for other reasons—often from oversight rather than through deliberate parental decision. The proportion of children in the latter category has dropped significantly since 1998. 

(So ask yourselves, "Why is such a small percentage of the population such a threat to them, the rulers of the world?")

However, those electing not to vaccinate their children tend to be concentrated in specific areas, allowing infectious disease outbreaks to take hold. Advocates of the new policy hope it will raise vaccination rates in these areas to the point where herd immunity will be sufficient to prevent further outbreaks. 

(Two points: Firstly, as in California in 2010, it was many vaccinated kids who became ill with Whooping Cough.  Secondly, germ theory is just that...a theory.  True immunity occurs when your body doesn't allow various bugs to take over.  History lesson:  Although Louis Pasteur is credited with Germ Theory, the real first person was Geronimo Fracastrio.  In 1553, he published "De Contagionibus et Contagiosis Morbis, et eorum Curatine" in which he gave details about the cause of contagious diseases.  I can bet you have never heard of him.  Well, he did research on the very things that Pasteur received credit for.  Why?  Was the time right in the 1800's, so now they can let the public know about it?  Doesn't that make you wonder what answers they have right now, but they have decided it's too premature for you to know yet?  I'm getting side tracked.  Back to Germ Theory.  In the 1800's, Pasteur and Antoine Bechamp were contemporaries, but Bechamp discovered a microscopic thing, a microzyma, that would determine if your body would have infections, or be in a balanced state.  See, basically, Bechamp proved that things like stress could activate these microzymas and then the body would be sick.  It's not something from the outside at all.  I mean, to start with.  If you're living with flow and balance and listening to your body, you could be around tons of sick people and be ok.  There's a lot more to his theory and reasons why sickness would occur, but I just wanted to introduce you to the idea that what your learning is controlled by the powers that be.  So, could it be true that the pharmaceutical industry who loved Pasteur's modle, and for all we know they hired him and handed Fracastrio's work, wanting him to be big in this field so as they could say, "See.  You need our drugs and vaccines."  Could it be equally as true that today "Research" runs the same way?  We need the public to buy vaccines.  Do what you can to make that happen.  Yo!  Public.  It's time to wise up and get your hands on as many books as you can.  Read.  Learn.  Investigate.  Then ask any politicians in bed with Big Pharma to step down.  Lecture over.)




 
http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/australia-make-welfare-payments-dependent-vaccination
 



 




 














Sunday, March 1, 2015

Atypical Measles and Cholesterol Problems from Vaccination

I did a Google search for deaths from Atypical Measles and this awesome article showed up.

Before you allow your child to be vaccinated with MMR, please read this in its entirety.

http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2013/01/18/the-ineffectiveness-of-measles-vaccines-and-other-unintended-consequences-by-dr-viera-scheibner-phd/

READ HER BIO!!!

Autism is the Epidemic

 

"Since When Did We Become So Afraid of Measles?
By Lyn Redwood, R.N., M.S.N., co-founder of SafeMinds
Since when did we become so afraid of the measles?
I’ve blogged about the one-sided and exaggerated media coverage of the measles before. My colleagues and I are used to name-calling. But the hate circulating on the Internet and in mainstream newspapers about measles this week has escalated so much that even I am in shock.
In case you missed it, there is an article in USA Today claiming that non-vaccinating parents should be jailed and a Forbes opinion piece suggesting lawyers should sue parents whose children are not vaccinated against the measles.
The mainstream is actually endorsing and promoting the idea that we should put parents in jail, take their children away from them, and vaccinate the children against their parents’ best judgment. In America, not Stalin’s Soviet Union.
Note left on a mother's windshield
Note left on a mother’s windshield
I’m tired of the exaggeration, the obfuscation, and the one-sided reporting.
Journalists, public health officials, and parents of all stars and stripes need to understand that there are two sides to this discussion, that vaccination is not a cure-all, and that much of the measles media hype directly contradicts the science.
Ready for my reality check about the measles outbreaks in America?
Myth #1: Measles has become an epidemic in America.
Reality Check: Measles is not epidemic, autism is.
From January 1 to January 23, 68 people in 11 states have had the measles, according to the CDC. Out of a population of over 300 million people.
 “Last year, about 1 in every 500,000 Americans came down with the measles,” Gayle DeLong, Ph.D., an associate professor of economics and finance at the Zicklin School of Business in New York who has researched these issues for several years, explains. “Nearly all recovered in a few days without serious consequences. At the same time, about 1 in 68 American children had autism, a crippling neurological disease. Put another way, for everyone who had measles last year, there were over 7,000 children with autism. Which is the epidemic?”
Myth #2: Measles is deadly to American children.
Reality Check: Measles is almost always a mild disease in developed countries. Deaths are rare and far between.
In the last twenty years in the United States, there has been fewer than one death per year from the measles. It is difficult to find accurate data on this but, according to the CDC, there have been no deaths from measles in the last five years.
In other words, your child’s risk of dying from the measles in the United States hovers right around (wait for it) … 0.
measles graph
This is an emotional debate. But if we take our fear and emotions out of the equation, we find that our children are at a vastly greater risk of being hit by lightening, or, sadly, from complications from the MMR vaccination itself, than of dying from complications of the measles.
Nearly 50 percent of children with autism will wander away from a safe environment. They are at high risk of dying from accidental drowning. Children with autism also often have other health problems that sometimes kill them. Scores of children with autism have died in the past few years (source), like 4-year-old Jayden Morrison, 16-year-old Erick Ortiz, and 6-year-old Dena Burns. I can’t tell you the exact number, but I can tell you that people with autism have between twice and nearly ten times the risk of dying than people who do not have it.
Myth #3: Measles is a terrifying disease.
Reality Check: Measles is a bad rash and, yes, it can be terrifying if you’re a new parent who is unfamiliar with the disease.
The truth is measles is very contagious. So contagious that you can contract it from air droplets left by someone who is no longer in the room with you.
The truth is that it can also be terrifying if your child gets a bad rash and a high fever from the measles.
But the other truth is that the majority of people who have severe—or even any—complications from the measles are those who live in developing countries who do not have access to clean water and healthy food.
How do I know that measles is usually a mild disease?
Not only because the World Health Organization states as much:
“Severe measles is more likely among poorly nourished young children, especially those with insufficient vitamin A, or whose immune systems have been weakened by HIV/AIDS or other diseases.” [My emphasis.]
But also because I had the measles when I was a kid. It was so mild I don’t even remember being sick! And my husband, who is an emergency room doctor, also had the measles as a kid. He remembers being happy to have the measles because his older brother had them at the same time and they got to be sick together.
If you think I’m downplaying the severity of the measles, watch this 8-minute YouTube compilation. These popular TV shows all show that measles really were not a big deal.
So why the measles hysteria?
Because, according to the CDC, the best strategy for increasing the uptake for vaccines is to promote the perception that “many people are falling ill” and the perception “of vulnerability to contracting the disease and experiencing bad illness.”
The measles hype is the latest in the infectious disease hysteria (I’m thinking SARS, Avian bird flu, MERS, the list goes on) that is a smoke screen for the real and devastating health problems in America right now.
You’ve heard me say this before, but the real problem in America that the media is ignoring is chronic disease:
  • Autism
  • Asthma
  • Diabetes
  • Poor mental health
The cost of measles to our society is very low.
But the cost of autism to our society is exorbitant.
The costs of providing care for each person with autism affected through his or her lifespan are $2.3 million in the U.S. Autism is currently estimated to cost society a staggering $126 billion per year – a number that has more than tripled since 2006 (source).
And those numbers do not factor in the emotional costs to a family, the money spent by local law enforcement when children with autism run away, the collective social burden of adults who cannot function independently, or the exhausting day-to-day tasks of changing the diapers of a 17-year-old.
Myth #4 The MMR vaccine is safe.
Reality Check: MMR vaccination may well be more dangerous than the measles.
Though most people who receive the MMR vaccine are not going to have any noticeable and immediate adverse reactions, in 2014, vaccine recipients reported over 3,300 adverse events from the MMR vaccine, including 132 serious reactions.
The adverse reactions that have been reported in clinical trials following the MMR vaccine are too numerous for me to list here. I’ll just give you a few highlights: anaphylactic shock, thrombocytopenia, arthritis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, and … death.
The MMR combination vaccine carries such a high risk of fever and febrile seizures for children ages 12 to 23 months of age for seven to ten days after the vaccine that researchers, who published their findings in a study in Pediatrics that has been largely ignored, concluded that doctors must inform parents of the elevated risk.
Even more troubling, a recent study that has also been conveniently ignored by the medical mainstream, found that when the combined measles vaccine was given to girls at 12 months of age it was associated with a 1 in 110 risk of an emergency room visit and/or hospitalization.
Then there is the fact that the CDC manipulated and falsified data in one of the epidemiological studies that “proves” that vaccines do not cause autism. The data they left out, according to a CDC scientist, shows that African-American boys are at a much higher risk of getting autism following MMR vaccination before 36 months of age.
On September 23, 2014 an Italian court awarded compensation to a family whose son had vaccine-induced autism, confirming that the MMR vaccine can cause autism.
And the American government has also acknowledged that vaccines can lead to autism in susceptible children. Hannah Poling’s father is a prominent doctor. Her mother is a nurse and a lawyer. A normally developing child, Hannah became severely damaged by vaccines, including the MMR vaccine. She now needs 24-hour 7-day a week care. The family was compensated for her vaccine-induced autism by the federal government.
Myth #5: The mainstream media is telling you the truth.
Reality Check: The mainstream media is systematically shutting down any intelligent and open discussion about vaccine safety and how to improve it.
Jonathan Rose, Ph.D., William R. Kenan Jr. Professor of History at Drew University, has a compelling reason why:
“The mainstream media is telling only one side of the story because it has lost so much advertising revenue to the Web, and is therefore dependent on one of the few industries that continues to advertise in traditional media: the pharmaceutical companies,” Rose explained to us in an email exchange this week.
“In her recent book, Stonewalled, Sharyl Attkisson reported that CBS was pressured by pharmaceutical advertisers after she aired a story about adverse reactions to vaccines,” Rose continues. “And not long ago an article touting vaccines appeared in Parade magazine: fully a third of the advertisements in that issue were placed by pharmaceutical companies.
“Even Katie Couric, probably the best-known journalist in America, was forced to back off after she aired a program that reported both sides of the story about Gardasil, featuring those who defended its safety and effectiveness and those who alleged that some girls had been seriously injured by the vaccine. So the only media that remain free to report honestly about vaccines are those not dependent on drug advertising: books and alternative websites.”
Myth #6: Anti-vaxxers are stupid.
Reality check: Anti-vaxxers may not even exist, but those choosing to forego some vaccines for legitimate reasons are among the best educated and the most intelligent people in America.
The umbrella “anti-vax” insult includes parents who chose to forego just one or two vaccines, parents whose children have had severe reactions to vaccines and can no longer vaccinate, and even people, like Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., whose children are fully vaccinated on the recommended schedule but who speak openly about their concerns about vaccine safety.
But who are these lazy, stupid, selfish parents? Let me give you just a few examples: They are people like Yale-educated Aviva Romm, M.D. who has spent her career empowering women to take charge of their health; San Diego-based pediatrician Jay Gordon, M.D., who was a senior fellow in pediatric nutrition at Sloan-Kettering in New York City and on the faculty of UCLA Medical Center and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; and Howard Morningstar, M.D., who graduated from Yale Medical School and did his residency in family medicine at Brown University.
Indeed, several studies, including this one, have shown that it is usually the most highly educated, affluent families who choose to forgo some vaccines.
Professor Rose has something to say about those “anti-vaxxers” we’ve all been reading about as well.
 “Most of them aren’t actually anti-vaxxers,” Rose insists. “By definition, antivaccinationists reject all vaccines. Relatively few people take that radical position, though their numbers are growing. A much larger proportion of the population are ‘vaccine skeptics’–that is, those who refuse some but not all vaccines. But the term ‘anti-vaxxer’ is commonly used to smear anyone who has any reservations about any vaccine. In much the same way, back in the McCarthy era, the epithet ‘Commie’ was applied to civil rights workers, beatniks, labor union reformers, Hubert Humphrey liberals, and occasionally (but not very often) actual members of the (tiny) American Communist Party.
In the past, resistance to vaccines was concentrated among the illiterate and the working classes, but today the resisters tend to be well educated, and often have graduate degrees. Vaccine advocates find it difficult to explain why the best educated people would deliberately and recklessly endanger the health of the children. The answer, obviously, is that these people have research skills, they know how to find and read scientific papers, and thus they discover problems with vaccines that aren’t reported in the mainstream media.”
All this measles hype is diverting our attention away from any serious discussion of what our public health priorities should be.
I’m worried about chronic disease.
I’m worried about autism.
I’m worried about vaccine safety.
I’m worried about the kids who are aging out of state-funded help.
I’m worried about supporting parents who are at their wit’s ends because their children are so sick.
We do have something to fear: the rising rates of autism.
Stopping the autism epidemic, helping children with autism, and finding a cure for this sometimes debilitating disease should be our nation’s first priority and concern.  Support SafeMinds efforts to do this by donating today.
Lyn Redwood, R.N., M.S.N., is a survivor of measles, mumps, rubella, and chicken pox. She is the vice president and co-founder of SafeMinds.

  1. DRENA Reply
    I agree with Jessica RN. She is absolutely right. The only vacinne I had as a kid was the polio vaccine, and they gave it at school. Never vaccinated for chickenpox or measles. My granddaughter, 28, had both measles and chickenpox as a child, but neither of us has had the mumps. My brother did when we were kids, and the Dr said I was immune to mumps. I just dont understand all the hype about the measles, it is a childhood disease, very common when I grew up. We should become just as concerned about our country and what our government is NOT doing, if they dont get things right for the american people, it wont make a hill of beans about measles!!!!
  2. Darlene RN Reply
    I am speechless! Such an excellent article!!! As a fellow RN, and mom, I can not even begin to find the words to properly convey my concern about all of the ridiculous hype and blatant lies and outright hatred towards non-vaxxers being spewed out by the media over this current measles "outbreak". Lyn, everything you have written in this article is the type of information that I am continually telling people, and trying to get out there. So this article is one that I am most definitely going to share everywhere! Keep up the good work of informing and spreading the truth!"
  3.