Monday, May 25, 2015

Master's Miracle II Soap: Authentic, Harmful, You Decide


I wanted to share a description of Miracle II soap with you because perhaps you have not heard of it.  I know a clairvoyant who has seen disturbing energies come from a person’s head when they have rested a moment with the soap in their wet hair, prior to rinsing it out.  He went on to observe others and decided different drugs, including novicane, left energies within the human body that need to be removed and that this soap has the ability to do so.  Whether an accurate statement or not, I like this soap.

 

Well, while searching for an article to post to this site, I find this one.  It is controversial and more fun reading compared to what I could have posted.  I want to remind you that the ingredients in sugar-free gum, sunscreens, and toothpastes, to name just a few, can at times be far worse than the ingredients in this soap.  (I actually don’t have a problem with the ingredients in this soap.)

 

It’s humorous to me that the author of this article is saying that the maker of the soap is equating God with Satan and hoping that all religions meld into one.  If this was a debating class, we could have a lot of fun taking either side on a discussion of God.  “God is love.” “No, God wants you to recruit just like the devil.  God sends you to Hell if you don’t do his bidding.  Both are the same as a Demon’s behavior!”  But this is not a debate.  It is a discussion on soap, of all things.

 

Orgone is said to be subtle energy and yet argued to be the opposite of Christianity.  This seems a weak argument to me against using this soap.  Our bodies are temples, yet many put aspartame, fluorinated water, and GMOed corn into them.  Surely how we eat and breathe these days is the opposite of Christianity more so than this soap.  The human body is physical and has subtle energies.  I don’t see how it is against Christianity, or against your body to say so.

 

As for those invested in dark practices using orgone, anyone can access anything and use it for the betterment of mankind, or the detriment of mankind.  It doesn’t make the thing itself evil.  Water, for instance, can give life and it can keep us and our belongings clean.  But, if those interested in dark practices hold someone’s head under water until they are dead, that is not the water’s fault.  The darkness of Intention is only made so by what one would have manifest.  Intention is a normal, pure, creative force.  The sculptor is the one who decides on what is to be created.  Good or bad.  Magic is the same.  White magic is healing/balancing using one’s Intention.  So, if magic is involved with the creation of this soap, it is not necessarily a bad thing

 

The author of the following article sees subtle energy as that of the demon and so sees demons in the soap.  I feel Miracle II’s subtle energy and approve of it.  The article is an interesting look at the ingredients and a fun read.  It has been reproduced in part here.  I have included the link so you may read it in its entirety.

Personally, I assume that the makers of this soap would be as me and label sodium laureth sulfate, sodium lauryl sulfate and the like as dangerous.   I assume the makers of this soap don't care what the government deems as acceptable or not.  Our standards are higher. 



Miracle II: The Real Master Behind the Miracles
 
Miracle II Ingredients: Divine or Demonic?
The back cover of the Miracle II Telling the Good News promotional brochure states: "Miracle II is a miraculous, supernatural product that contains Spiritual and Eloptic Energy beyond measure."
Is the Miracle II soap really inspired by God? Let us examine the ingredients in this "miraculous, supernatural" product.
At the time this article was written, (2003) Heartland Enterprises' Miracle II FAQ web page contained the following information regarding the Miracle 2 soap ingredients:
What are the ingredients of Miracle II Soap? (What's on the label?)
The FDA does not regulate the contents of soap. The inventor of Miracle II Products, Clayton Tedeton, has decided not to reveal the exact formula, and therefore the exact answer to that question is between him and God. What we do know is from the label on the Miracle II Soap bottle, which reads thus: "The most complex mixture of natural minerals and organics that has ever been blended together. Miracle II is a spiritually revealed, formulated product. Contains: Prayer - Electrically engineered eloptic energized stabilized oxygenated water - Ash of Dedecyl solution - Dehydrabiethylamine - Clacium - Potassium - Magnesium - Foaming agent - Cold pressed Acovado - Almond - Olive & Coconut Oils - Vitamin E - Miracle II contains and holds spiritual and eloptic energy.
(Quote Source: Heartland Enterprises FAQ )
[Note: Heartland Enterprises failed to mention that this is actually the ingredient label for the Miracle II Moisturizing Soap, which has more impressive-sounding ingredients (cold pressed avocado, almond, olive and coconut oils and Vitamin E) than the regular Miracle II Soap. This is deceptive.]
Clayton Tedeton is not required by law to reveal the ingredients in his Miracle II /The Master's Miracle soap. Therefore, he has elected not to reveal all the ingredients. He has, however, chosen to reveal the spiritual  ingredients in the product formula that was allegedly given by God. 
Let us begin by examining the six spiritual ingredients in the Miracle II Soap:
  • prayer
  • eloptic energized stablized oxygenated water
  • Ash of Dedecyl solution
  • Dehydrabiethylamine
  • spiritual energy
  • eloptic energy. 
Eloptic Energized Stablized Oxygenated Water
This ingredient bears a long, somewhat confusing name. We will focus on the spiritual aspect of this ingredient. The word eloptic is so important to the manufacturer that it was mentioned twice in the Miracle II soap description. What is eloptic energized water? It is water that contains eloptic energy. According to the Miracle II Scientific Information, eloptic energy is subtle energy:
When viewing the reconstituted Neutralizer in solid form, it has a curious pale blue color, like the atmosphere. We surmise that this is the life (giving oxygen locked into the mix. It is, in addition, evidence of the Eloptic (subtle) energy the same as Reich's Orgone energy, which is reported to be pale blue in color).
Remember, the definition for eloptic energy was taken from the Miracle II Scientific data, which is straight from the manufacturer. The Miracle 2 manufacturer made it perfectly clear that eloptic energy is subtle energy. Subtle energy is the healing power source in Reiki, reflexology, iridology, acupressure, acupuncture, homeopathy, naturopathy, and a host of other New Age healing methodologies.
What is subtle energy? Subtle energy has to do with phenomena not currently explained by conventional science. Reports that the Miracle II neutralizer gel immediately relieves pain upon application to an aching limb is an example of unexplainable phenomena. Unexplainable phenomena is not necessarily of God:
"Subtle energy" refers to the medium through which consciousness acts on the realm of matter and energy. According to a National Institutes of Health study, at least 52 terms are used for "subtle energy": chi, prana, holy spirit, manna, ether, orgone, biomagnetism and zeropoint, among many others in our current vocabulary. Regardless of the label, it appears to contribute to many phenomena not currently explained by conventional science: telekinesis, remote sensing, telepathy, gut or heartbased intuition, healing by prayer or other psychic means, biocommunication between species, etc.
The Holy Spirit (written in lower case letters) is mentioned as a synonym for subtle energy. This is the same thing as saying that God is Satan! But as already mentioned in the article, "Clayton Tedeton and the Source," the New Age movement is pushing for syncretism--a merging of Christianity and all other belief systems. 
It is revealing that zero point and orgone are included in the abbreviated list of subtle energy synonyms. Zero point and orgone energy is mentioned in the Miracle II Scientific Information! Orgone, another term for subtle energy, is an occult/New Age term, and is antithetical to Christianity:
Orgone is the universal Life force, the basic building block of all organic and inorganic matter on the material planet. Coined by Dr. Wilhelm Reich, Orgone has been called by the Great mystics and philosophers; Chi, Prana or simply the Force. Dr. Reich, an Austrian scientist, philosopher and psychoanalyst; developed a technology to tap into the Cosmic Orgone Sea to provide a continuous stream of Life-force energy.
(Quote source: Orgone Products)
Those who openly follow Satan admit the dark character of orgone: 
All life springs from the All, that dark force which permeates the Universe and sends each atom spinning; prana, orgone or cosmic energy, call it what you will - it is the Dark Mother Kali/Shiva.
(Quote source: Alt.satanism FAQ file)
Subtle energy is also called psychic power and is used in magick:
... life force is the subtle energy, or psychic power, that is used in all methods of magick, spiritual work, treasure mapping, self-motivation or shamanic practice. 
(Quote source: #1 World leader in Orgone technology, radionics and mind machines)
Paul Von Ward, author of Frontier Science and Human Development, defined subtle energy in a similar fashion:
"Subtle energy" refers to the medium through which consciousness acts on the realm of matter and energy."
(Quote source: Body, Mind, Spirit)
William Collinge, author of Subtle Energy: Awakening to the Unseen Forces in Our Lives, believes that subtle energy explains, among other things, the energies of the earth:
Subtle Energy explains our energetic anatomy, the vital force that makes us alive, the energetic dynamics of our relationships, the energies of the earth, and remarkable discoveries in the influences of the sun, moon and planets.
Collinge mentioned some of the ways subtle energy is utilized:
Along the way, it explores simple yet powerful techniques for cultivating and strengthening our vital energy; healing methods such as the laying-on-of-hands and Therapeutic Touch; and the mysterious energetic phenomena of chanting, prayer, meditation and tantric sexual practices. 
(Quote source: Subtle Energy)

Clayton Tedeton has obviously learned how to harness subtle energy for temporary "healing" purposes. He has assigned subtle energy (demons) to go into and stay in his Miracle II products. Indeed, the manufacturer made a point of stating that the Miracle II products contain and hold eloptic energy! Subtle energy does not go into a substance and stay there without being directed by someone who Satan has "favored" with this authority.
Rarely are such (subtle) energies forthrightly identified as evil spirits but that is exactly what they are. These energies are utilized in most alternative healing therapies. Naturopaths, for example, are trained to detect imbalances of subtle energy, and indeed, some of the spokesmen for the Miracle II products are doctors of Naturopathy. (See: Miracle II: The Real Master Behind the Miracles Healings Are From M-II "Energy" Not God)
Using Miracle II products is the same thing as utilizing subtle energy, whether the user realizes it or not. If you have used any Miracle II products, you have unwittingly given Satan permission to come into your life and have deceitful "fellowship" with you. He will even give you a measure of demonic healing to keep you captive to his Miracle II subtle energy products. Take back the place you have given to Satan and his demons by renouncing the Miracle II products. The god of subtle energy by any other name is still Satan:
 "Neither give place to the devil." (Ephesians 4:27)
Ash of Dedecyl solution
Miracle II Product Scientific Data* sheds some light on this demonically inspired ingredient:
Those of you who follow the Edgar Cayce health readings will recall that Cayce had a cancer remedy based on something he called "animated ash." Animated ash was a form of bamboo that was reduced to activated charcoal by means of a partial vacuum electrical carbon arc process. The resulting ash was taken internally. Coconut husk derived activated charcoal is the preferred form of charcoal for water and air filtration. Miracle II products all contain an electrically treated coconut based surfactant in addition to the ash of dodecyl sulfate.
Edgar Cayce was a well-known psychic and considered by many to be the Father of Holistic Medicine. He was used of Satan to channel "healing remedies" to others in his long career as a psychic diagnostician. Why would the Miracle II manufacturer (Clayton Tedeton) assume some Miracle II users would be followers of Edgar Cayce readings?!
Christians are often unaware of such things, but Satan's followers know why an ingredient that Edgar Cayce is known for is included in the Miracle II formula. The purpose is to mark it for Satan. 
Edgar Cayce often recommended animated ash and ultra-violet light therapy for persons suffering from cancer. The readings stated that the animated ash would increase the oxygen in the body and assist the immune system in fighting the cancer.
The "readings" refer to Edgar Cayce's channeling sessions in which demons would speak through him. Why do you think the ash is called animated? The ash contains "life energy"—one of the New Age terms for demons. If Cayce's "animated ash" ingredient healed anyone of cancer, you can be sure it was a demonic healing.
The following description of channeling does not mention demons. Instead, the New-Age-correct phrase, "contact with all time and space" is used to give what is evil a more innocent appearance:
For forty-three years of his adult life, Edgar Cayce demonstrated the uncanny ability to put himself into some kind of self-induced sleep state by lying down on a couch, closing his eyes, and folding his hands over his stomach. This state of relaxation and meditation enabled him to place his mind in contact with all time and space........
Listen to: The Miracle II Soap Products Critique: Questions and Answers
Subscribe to the Liberty To The Captives Podcast.
update: dangerous bacteria found in Miracle II and The Master's Miracle The FDA warns against using Miracle II Neutralizer and Neutralizer Gel.
edited 05/28/06

Thursday, April 23, 2015

SB 277 Revised

Amended  IN  Senate  April 22, 2015
Amended  IN  Senate  April 09, 2015


CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2015–2016 REGULAR SESSION


Senate Bill No. 277



Introduced by Senators Pan and Allen
(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Gonzalez)
(Coauthors: Senators Beall, Block, De León, Hall, Hertzberg, Hill, Jackson, Leno, McGuire, Mitchell, Stone, Wieckowski, and Wolk)
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Baker, Chiu, Cooper, Low, McCarty, Nazarian, Rendon, Mark Stone, and Wood)

February 19, 2015



An act to add Section 48980.5 to the Education Code, and to amend Sections 120325, 120335, and 120370 of, and to repeal Section 120365 of, the Health and Safety Code, relating to public health.



LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST



SB 277, as amended, Pan. Public health: vaccinations.

(1) Existing law prohibits the governing authority of a school or other institution from unconditionally admitting any person as a pupil of any public or private elementary or secondary school, child care center, day nursery, nursery school, family day care home, or development center, unless prior to his or her admission to that institution he or she has been fully immunized against various diseases, including measles, mumps, and pertussis, subject to any specific age criteria. Existing law authorizes an exemption from those provisions for medical reasons or because of personal beliefs, if specified forms are submitted to the governing authority. Existing law requires the governing authority of a school or other institution to require documentary proof of each entrant’s immunization status. Existing law authorizes the governing authority of a school or other institution to temporarily exclude a child from the school or institution if the authority has good cause to believe that the child has been exposed to one of those diseases, as specified.

This bill would eliminate the exemption from immunization based upon personal beliefs. This bill would except pupils in a home-based private school and students enrolled in an independent study pursuant to specified law from the prohibition described above of all of the school’s pupils are residents of the household or are members of a single family. above. The bill would narrow the authorization for temporary exclusion to make it applicable only to a child whose documentary proof of immunization status does not show proof of immunization against one of the diseases described above. The bill would make conforming changes to related provisions.
(2) Existing law requires the governing board of a school district, at the beginning of the first semester or quarter of the regular school term, to make certain notifications to parents or guardians of minor pupils including, among others, specified rights and responsibilities of a parent or guardian and specified school district policies and procedures.
This bill would require the governing board of a school district to also include in the notifications provided to parents or guardians of minor pupils at the beginning of the regular school term the immunization rates for the school in which a pupil is enrolled for each required immunization. By requiring school districts to notify parents or guardians of school immunization rates, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.


Vote: MAJORITY   Appropriation: NO   Fiscal Committee: YES   Local Program: YES  



The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1.

 Section 48980.5 is added to the Education Code, to read:
48980.5.
 The notification required pursuant to Section 48980 shall also include the immunization rates for the school in which a pupil is enrolled for each of the immunizations required pursuant to Section 120335 of the Health and Safety Code.

SEC. 2.

 Section 120325 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
120325.
 In enacting this chapter, but excluding Section 120380, and in enacting Sections 120400, 120405, 120410, and 120415, it is the intent of the Legislature to provide:
(a) A means for the eventual achievement of total immunization of appropriate age groups against the following childhood diseases:
(1) Diphtheria.
(2) Hepatitis B.
(3) Haemophilus influenzae type b.
(4) Measles.
(5) Mumps.
(6) Pertussis (whooping cough).
(7) Poliomyelitis.
(8) Rubella.
(9) Tetanus.
(10) Varicella (chickenpox).
(11) Any other disease deemed appropriate by the department, taking into consideration the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Academy of Family Physicians.
(b) That the persons required to be immunized be allowed to obtain immunizations from whatever medical source they so desire, subject only to the condition that the immunization be performed in accordance with the regulations of the department and that a record of the immunization is made in accordance with the regulations.
(c) Exemptions from immunization for medical reasons.
(d) For the keeping of adequate records of immunization so that health departments, schools, and other institutions, parents or guardians, and the persons immunized will be able to ascertain that a child is fully or only partially immunized, and so that appropriate public agencies will be able to ascertain the immunization needs of groups of children in schools or other institutions.
(e) Incentives to public health authorities to design innovative and creative programs that will promote and achieve full and timely immunization of children.

SEC. 3.

 Section 120335 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
120335.
 (a) As used in this chapter, “governing authority” means the governing board of each school district or the authority of each other private or public institution responsible for the operation and control of the institution or the principal or administrator of each school or institution.
(b) The governing authority shall not unconditionally admit any person as a pupil of any private or public elementary or secondary school, child care center, day nursery, nursery school, family day care home, or development center, unless, prior to his or her first admission to that institution, he or she has been fully immunized. This subdivision does not apply to a pupil in a home-based private school if all of the pupils are residents of the household or are members of a single family. or a pupil who is enrolled in an independent study pursuant to Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 51745) of Chapter 5 of Part 28 of the Education Code. The following are the diseases for which immunizations shall be documented:
(1) Diphtheria.
(2) Haemophilus influenzae type b.
(3) Measles.
(4) Mumps.
(5) Pertussis (whooping cough).
(6) Poliomyelitis.
(7) Rubella.
(8) Tetanus.
(9) Hepatitis B.
(10) Varicella (chickenpox).
(11) Any other disease deemed appropriate by the department, taking into consideration the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Academy of Family Physicians.
(c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), full immunization against hepatitis B shall not be a condition by which the governing authority shall admit or advance any pupil to the 7th grade level of any private or public elementary or secondary school.
(d) The governing authority shall not unconditionally admit or advance any pupil to the 7th grade level of any private or public elementary or secondary school unless the pupil has been fully immunized against pertussis, including all pertussis boosters appropriate for the pupil’s age.
(e) The department may specify the immunizing agents that may be utilized and the manner in which immunizations are administered.

(f)This section shall become operative on July 1, 2012.

SEC. 4.

 Section 120365 of the Health and Safety Code is repealed.

SEC. 5.

 Section 120370 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
120370.
 (a) If the parent or guardian files with the governing authority a written statement by a licensed physician to the effect that the physical condition of the child is such, or medical circumstances relating to the child are such, that immunization is not considered safe, indicating the specific nature and probable duration of the medical condition or circumstances that contraindicate immunization, that child shall be exempt from the requirements of Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 120325, but excluding Section 120380) and Sections 120400, 120405, 120410, and 120415 to the extent indicated by the physician’s statement.
(b) When there is good cause to believe that a child whose documentary proof of immunization status does not show proof of immunization against a communicable disease listed in subdivision (b) of Section 120335 has been exposed to one of those diseases, that child may be temporarily excluded from the school or institution until the local health officer is satisfied that the child is no longer at risk of developing or transmitting the disease.

SEC. 6.

 If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division"
 

My question is...how come there's a part that talks about this document becoming operative on July 1, 2012 when Pan presented it on February 19, 2015?  Did he have the document waiting for the right time?    Did he know the public would have to be frightened into allowing us to be governed into giving up our rights to choose our medical procedures for ourselves?  Were the right circumstances made to happen?

 

Letter to Each Senator to vote in April


Dear Ms. Jackson,

I am writing to ask you to vote no on SB 277.  If you are considering voting yes, I invite you to listen to me.

SB 277:

★ Removes California’s citizen’s right to a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) It is inappropriate to establish legislation that forces us to educate our children and then turns around and makes it conditional.

★ Under the Individuals with Disabilities Act, students are guaranteed a Free and Appropriate Public Education to carry out their Individual Education Plan (IEP) until the age of 22

★ Violates medical ethics, (as written in Opinion 8.08 of the American Medical Association).  How is it ethical for the leaders of California to force us to have medical procedures?  Whether you have studied medicine or not, I did not hire you to make my medical decisions for me.

★ Segregation issue: SB277 will segregate an entire class of children which is unconstitutional, especially since there are protections in place for students with HIV and HepB. To separate is inherently not equal (Brown v. Board of Education).  The camps made for Jews and non-Nazis comes to mind.  If you vote yes on SB 277, you are supporting dividing the population.

★ Violates the "equal protection clause" of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

★ Removes freedom of religion, (as declared by the California Constitution Declaration of Rights, Article 1, Section 4).  I would appreciate believing I am free to choose whether I place crap in my temple (body), or not.  It is not for SB 277 to decide, thank-you very much!

I live in California; therefore, your vote matters to me.  Please support our freedom to choose our own medical procedures. 

Thank-you.

Bright Day Thoughts,

Debbie Allsup

SB 277 Threatens to Revoke Rights to Make Medical Choices

The following is from http://www.sb277.org/

The Education hearing
possibly the LARGEST turn out of opposition in Legislative History over 800 voiced public opposition
April 15, 2015 (view recorded meeting)
Due to an overwhelming amount of unanswered questions by the Senate and lack of answers by the bill's authors vote was postponed until
Wednesday, April 22, at 9 AM

The Bill passed the committee with 2 amendments and many Senator's concerns unaddressed. Vote of 7 yes and 2 no.
Noes were 
Sharon Runner R-Lancaster
& Connie Leyva, D-Chino


Mark your calendar for next week's Judiciary Hearing at 1:30pm Tues
April 28th.

★ ACTION PLAN ★
 We need to point out the issues with this bill as amended

1. Please start formulating your letters and send them off via fax or email to the Senate Judiciary Committee members. Please ONLY CALL if you are a CONSTITUENT of that senator. All contact information is below.

Some points to hit on in your letters:

★ Segregation issue: SB277 will segregate an entire class of children which is unconstitutional, especially since there are protections in place for students with HIV and HepB. Separate is inherently not equal (Brown v. Board of Education).
★ Removes our right to a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
★ Violates medical ethics, (as written in Opinion 8.08 of the American Medical Association).
★ Removes freedom of religion, (as declared by the California Constitution Declaration of Rights, Article 1, Section 4).
★ Under the Individuals with Disabilities Act, students are guaranteed a Free and Appropriate Public Education to carry out their Individual Education Plan (IEP) until the age of 22
★ Violates the "equal protection clause" of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.


EMAIL - SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
(copy the list and paste to BCC field of your email for a quick and easy batch email)

Senator.Jackson@senate.ca.gov,
Senator.Moorlach@senate.ca.gov,
Senator.Anderson@senate.ca.gov,
Senator.Hertzberg@senate.ca.gov,
Senator.Leno@senate.ca.gov,
Senator.Monning@senate.ca.gov,
Senator.Wieckowski@senate.ca.gov


FAX – Please only send your fax one time.
Senator Jackson – (916) 651-4919
Senator Moorlach – (916) 651-4937
Senator Anderson – (916) 651-4938
Senator Hertzberg – (916) 651-4918
Senator Leno – (916) 651-4911
Senator Monning – (916) 651-4917
Senator Wieckowski – (916) 651-4910


PHONE (only if you are their constituent)
Senator Jackson – (916) 651-4019
Senator Moorlach – (916) 651-4037
Senator Anderson – (916) 651-4038
Senator Hertzberg – (916) 651-4018
Senator Leno – (916) 651-4011
Senator Monning – (916) 651-4017
Senator Wieckowski – (916) 651-4010


2. MEETING WITH SENATORS:
Coordinate with your Senator's office to meet and dicuss your concerns. 


3.
Keep community outreach in the forefront of your mind. Canvassing at the weekend farmer's markets, peaceful protests, hosting an informational gathering with colleagues or in your mommy group, reaching out to your school's administrators...etc. Community outreach falls on each of us. At the very least, share this website with others
 SB277.ORG








 


 

The Senate Educational Committe's Votes

 BIT OF TRIVA
April 15 Education committee hearing public comments:
6 minutes SUPPORT: 47 adults with 18 groups represented

2.5 hours OPPOSITION: 623 adults, 134 children and 31 groups represented. 






Here is how the Senate Education Committee voted on Senate Bill 277:

Richard Pan, D-Sacramento Y

Carol Liu, D-La Cañada Flintridge Y

Bill Monning, D-Carmel Y

Andy Vidak, R-Hanford Y

Tony Mendoza, D-Artesia Y

Connie Leyva, D-Chino N

Marty Block, D-San Diego Y

Sharon Runner, R-Lancaster N

Loni Hancock, D-Berkeley Y


Thank-you to Connie Leyva and Sharon Runner for voting no to mandatory medical procedures.  If SB277 is signed into law, how is the Californian Government any better than Nazis forcing medical procedures on Jews and non-Nazis?  These yes voters need to step down.  They are not representing the public who does not wish to be enslaved.

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article19227906.html#storylink=cpy

Anti-Vaxxers to be Punished

Debbie Allsup in pink.  Stephen Lutz in blue.

Australia To Cut Welfare Payments

For Anti-Vaxxers

April 13, 2015 | by Stephen Luntz
 
 
The Australian government will tighten the rules requiring children to be vaccinated in order for parents to receive welfare payments and childcare subsidies.
Current Australia law states that children must be vaccinated if their parents are to get the Family Tax Benefit A and rebates for childcare costs. However, exemptions are allowed under three circumstances: medical grounds that make a child at increased risk of unusual reaction, religious opposition or other “personal objections.”
The new rules would remove the last option, while still allowing exceptions on religious and medical grounds. The proposal has the support of the Labor opposition, guaranteeing it passage through both houses of parliament.
As in other developed countries, Australia has experienced outbreaks of diseases such as measles and whooping cough that were once controlled or eliminated entirely as a result of increasing numbers of parents choosing not to vaccinate their children. 

(In America, at least, increases in whooping cough were not because of unvaccinated children.  I say this because a huge number of kids who had whooping cough had been vaccinated.  Rather than blaming unvaccinated kids, why not test the crap that rains down on us from chem trails!  Why not ask yourself, "Who gains when legislation is put in place to take away people's rights?")


"The choice made by families not to immunize their children is not supported by public policy or medical research,...
(Not true.  The research has been done and the results are out there.  For example:
"Dr Viera Scheibner is Principal Research Scientist (Retired) with a doctorate in Natural Sciences from Comenius University in Bratislava. After an eminent scientific career in micropalaeontology during which she published 3 books and some 90 scientific papers in refereed scientific journals in Australia and overseas, she studied babies’ breathing patterns with the Cotwatch breathing monitor developed by her late husband Leif Karlsson in the mid 1980s. Babies had alarms after vaccination, indicating stress. This introduced her to the subject of vaccination. She then started systematically studying orthodox medical papers dealing with vaccination issues. To this day she has collected and studied more than 100000 pages of medical papers.

Despite such extensive research of orthodox medical papers published on vaccines over the past 100 years, she established that there is no scientific evidence that these injections of highly noxious substances prevent diseases, quite to the contrary, that they increase susceptibility to the diseases which the vaccines are supposed to prevent and also to a host of related and unrelated viral and bacterial infections. Vaccines are involved in a great number of modern ills of childhood such as immunoreactive diseases (asthma, allergies), autoimmune diseases (diabetes, multiple sclerosis, lupus erythematosis), cancers, leukaemia, degenerative diseases of bone and cartilage, behavioural and learning problems, to mention just the most important conditions.

Her research into vaccination has culminated so far in two books and a number of shorter and longer individual papers published in a variety of scientific and medical publications. She has also conducted frequent international lecture tours to present the results of her research to parents, health and medical professionals and anyone else who is interested. She has also provided a great number of expert witness reports for court cases relating to deaths and injuries caused by vaccines, such as so-called “shaken baby” syndrome."  See what I mean?  The problem is that Abbott wasn't handed a paper with these words on it.  Like the general public, he only knows what he's told.)
...nor should such action be supported by taxpayers in the form of childcare payments,” Prime Minister Tony Abbott and
Social Services Minister Scott Morrison said in a joint statement. 
(Why?  What action should not be supported by taxpayers, the right to choose not to put crap in your child's bloodstream?  Abbott is showing his true colors here.  He doesn't like supporting freedom of thought.  He is speaking for Australians.  Maybe they like supporting freedom of thought.)
While the proposal has been welcomed by the Australian Medical Association and parental lobby groups, it has attracted criticism even from some vaccination supporters.

(Because the issue isn't about whether to vaccinate or not.  The issue is freedom of choice.  The more insane legislation the Australian public allows the government to sign into law, the easier it will be for other countries to do the same and the more
legislation the Australian government can implement on them, et cetera.) 
It has been noted that users of the conscientious objection clause
tend to be wealthy, and therefore less likely to be swayed
 by the loss of a means-tested welfare benefit. 
(Swayed means manipulated in this article.  It is unfair and therefore against the Australian citizen's rights to be forced to do something that they know is wrong.  Rather than wealthy, I'd say educated.  If the educated happen to have more money, fine, but that is not always the case.  At any rate, people who have spent years investigating this subject and therefore are educated on this subject, will absolutely NEVER allow this crap to be injected into their wee ones system.  How insane is it to force a family to hurt their children or no food will be on the table tonight.  When the wealthy won't budge, what kind of legislation will they come up with next?  A tax on all private helicopter rides?  A tax on maid service?  When will they stop, ever?)


The current Australian government's
record of hostility to science, demonstrated across many fields, has created suspicion about their motivation, particularly since the announcement coincides with moves to restrict welfare for other reasons. 

(Particularly.  The public are screwed no matter what you believe about vaccines.  Is it time to ask them to step down, yet?)

The conscientious objector clause has been used by less than 2% of parents in the last year. Another 6% of children are not vaccinated for other reasons—often from oversight rather than through deliberate parental decision. The proportion of children in the latter category has dropped significantly since 1998. 

(So ask yourselves, "Why is such a small percentage of the population such a threat to them, the rulers of the world?")

However, those electing not to vaccinate their children tend to be concentrated in specific areas, allowing infectious disease outbreaks to take hold. Advocates of the new policy hope it will raise vaccination rates in these areas to the point where herd immunity will be sufficient to prevent further outbreaks. 

(Two points: Firstly, as in California in 2010, it was many vaccinated kids who became ill with Whooping Cough.  Secondly, germ theory is just that...a theory.  True immunity occurs when your body doesn't allow various bugs to take over.  History lesson:  Although Louis Pasteur is credited with Germ Theory, the real first person was Geronimo Fracastrio.  In 1553, he published "De Contagionibus et Contagiosis Morbis, et eorum Curatine" in which he gave details about the cause of contagious diseases.  I can bet you have never heard of him.  Well, he did research on the very things that Pasteur received credit for.  Why?  Was the time right in the 1800's, so now they can let the public know about it?  Doesn't that make you wonder what answers they have right now, but they have decided it's too premature for you to know yet?  I'm getting side tracked.  Back to Germ Theory.  In the 1800's, Pasteur and Antoine Bechamp were contemporaries, but Bechamp discovered a microscopic thing, a microzyma, that would determine if your body would have infections, or be in a balanced state.  See, basically, Bechamp proved that things like stress could activate these microzymas and then the body would be sick.  It's not something from the outside at all.  I mean, to start with.  If you're living with flow and balance and listening to your body, you could be around tons of sick people and be ok.  There's a lot more to his theory and reasons why sickness would occur, but I just wanted to introduce you to the idea that what your learning is controlled by the powers that be.  So, could it be true that the pharmaceutical industry who loved Pasteur's modle, and for all we know they hired him and handed Fracastrio's work, wanting him to be big in this field so as they could say, "See.  You need our drugs and vaccines."  Could it be equally as true that today "Research" runs the same way?  We need the public to buy vaccines.  Do what you can to make that happen.  Yo!  Public.  It's time to wise up and get your hands on as many books as you can.  Read.  Learn.  Investigate.  Then ask any politicians in bed with Big Pharma to step down.  Lecture over.)




 
http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/australia-make-welfare-payments-dependent-vaccination