Friday, March 26, 2021

Letter to Newsom to End Experiments on Californians

Special shout out to David Martin World and Mike Freeman for some of the information used here.  Please feel free to take what you want and construct your own letter to your governor.  

I tried to send 5,700 characters of the below in an e-mail, but Newsom's e-mail would not accept it. It kept telling me I had 12,000 characters when I had edited a version on my computer to be certain it would be accepted.  Interesting.  (Same experience with past letters to him.) At any rate, this letter went through the post with my signature as the stamp outside the District of Columbia.  All words were spelled correctly in the original letter.  Here, I am trying to avoid the AI bots.

Gov. Gavin Newsom

1303 10th Street, Suite 1173

Sacramento, CA 95814


Dear Gov. Newsom:


Until you can prove publicly that a natural, wild C*VID-19 is floating around in the air, that it can be isolated from an infected person, and that it is contagious, please stop all experiments associated with COV*D-19 in California.  They are harmful and people of California deserve better.


Currently, staff and students are tested for CO*ID-19 before being permitted on school campuses when both the rapid antigen test and the PCR have on the label, as well as on each individually wrapped swab, that each swab was sterilized with ethylene oxide, a cancer-causing agent.  How dare you place us, especially our children, in harm’s way.  Further, testing healthy people for a problem is like giving healthy people the pertussis swab down the throat on a weekly basis.  It is criminal, unnecessary, and experimental, but to subject these kids to this chemical on a weekly basis, when prior to receiving this threat they were heathy, is unconscionable.  How can you stand back, allowing this to happen?  Code Federal Regulations, Section 50.20 says, “No investigator may involve a human being as a subject in research covered by these regulations unless the investigator has obtained the legally effective informed consent of the subject or the subject’s legally authorized representative.” These children, their parents, and the staff have not been informed that they are participating in an experiment on multiple levels: 1) regularly mass testing asymptomatic, healthy individuals, 2) regular exposure to ethylene oxide, 3) regularly retrieving genetic material when no-one can definitively know from whence it came.


Even the maker of the PCR said this process is not looking for an exact virus.  It looks for genetic debris and not even commercialized scientists can say how that debris got there.  (A person’s own cell may have tried to balance itself, making a byproduct called a virus, for instance.  That debris is from the immune system working, not an outside attack.)  Show proof of your claim that a C*VID-19 that is natural, wild, and floating around in the air has been isolated.  Next, show proof that this “test” can isolate that from a person and say it is there.  Lastly, show proof that this test is safe and safe on a weekly basis.  If you cannot do these three requests, then you have no right requiring that those living, working, and attending school in California must succumb to the C*VID-19 so-called test.


Alongside this, if you cannot show proof of your claim that a virus known as natural, wild C*VID-19 has been isolated, then you need to announce that there is no pandemic in California and all associated requirements to the myth and all of those arrested or fined due to the myth should be freed and released of all obligations associated with the myth. People of California need you to take their side in this.  Please do not abandon us.


Here is some information on how this is an experiment.  The private for-profit corporation known as the CDC sought, filed, and received a patent on April 25, 2003 which made the identification, the detection, and detection kits for coronavirus not available to the general population. They, by virtue of that act, by filing that patent, made it impossible for the public health interests to be served. That was the beginning.  In 2007, they extended their patent filing to actually patent the virus, which is against 35 US Code section 101. The reason I mention this is that testing could have been going on with so-called sick people for years.  Testing healthy people now is inappropriate, especially in light of this information.

In 2013-2018 they worked to use international sources to take the research on Gain of Function off-shore, because it had been determined (by the National Institute of Health in 2013) to be unethical. They decided to work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology so they could get around the ethical and legal implications of the work being done here in the US.  They did that willfully so that in September 2019 in the publication World at Risk from the World Health Organization, Dr. Anthony Fauci and the members of the committee actually affiliated with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, making a recommendation that a respiratory based pathogen simulation must be run.  With no institutional review board review, with no independent physician certifying that their actions were legal, they avoided the exclusions of Section 50.24 of the 21 Code of Regulations.  Meaning, in this instance, they cannot experiment on us, because there has been no institutional review board. There is no independent doctor.*  This so-called pandemic is the simulation! 

You either did not research or you are complicit in the crime against humanity.  At any rate, now that you are aware of an engineered virus, you know that the average person is not where the so-called COV*D-19 starts or ends.  Further, being an experiment on humanity, Govind Persad, Assistant Law Professor at the University of Denver, stated that experiments need to be socially as well as scientifically valuable. Those involved with the experiment need to be respected. The risks and benefits to the participants needs to be weighed against the benefit to society. An outside review of the ethics of the experiment is needed. This C*VID-19 psy-op has been nothing but political. It has not been socially beneficial. Participants are not being respected.  The COV*D-19 test is the clearest example of that since it goes after destroying the health of our youngest and most vulnerable.

Please publicly show proof of your claim that there is a natural, wild virus so scientists and doctors not affiliated with Big Pharma may dispute it, or publicly remove COV*D-19 testing and all the other experiments (mask-wearing, physically distancing, etc.) from California completely.  Thank-you.


In Truth,


Paget Hillebrand


*April 25, 2003, the CDC sought to patent the “Coronavirus Isolated from Humans” in violation of 35 U.S.C. §101 which prohibits patenting nature.

In addition to their attempt to patent the coronavirus associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), they received patent rights to the detection and the manufacturing of a kit to measure fragments of the virus and their awarded claims were granted on August 17, 2010 in U.S. Patent 7,776,521 (the “Patent”).

CDC, NIAID and their Conspiring Associates variously conducted descriptive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and Gain of Function (engineered virus made to be more pathogenic and contagious) research on coronavirus and such research would have required the use or infringement of the Patent at U.S. taxpayer expense in various grants including, but not limited to, U19 AI109761; R01 AI 108197; R01 AI132178; P30 DK065988; U19 AI109680, and other grants.

In September of 2019, Dr. Anthony Fauci of the NIAID and Dr. Chris Elias, President, Global Development Program for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, USA in their capacity as member of the World Health Organization’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board in their capacities as agents of NIAID and Conspiring Associates mandated that “the United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.”

On or about January 21, 2020, the U.S. reported its first case of coronavirus in Washington thought to be linked to what foreign sources had described as a “new” coronavirus.

On January 31, 2020, HHS Secretary Alex M. Azar II, relying on information provided by foreign sources, declared a Public Health Emergency for the United States.

On February 4, 2020, the United States Food and Drug Administration granted the CDC Emergency Use Authorization for a kit to detect coronavirus infection for which they provided no public notice regarding the establishment of an Institutional Review Board “with the concurrence of a licensed physician who is a member of or consultant to the IRB and is not otherwise participating in the clinical investigation” as required under 21 C.F.R. §50.24.

On February 10, 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci and Conspiring Associates were reported to discuss the financial benefit of the public becoming more committed to supporting research on coronaviruses in the article entitled, “Fluctuating funding and flagging interest hurt coronavirus research, leaving crucial knowledge gaps.”

On contravention to established, peer-reviewed medical science, the CDC, NIAID, and Conspiring Associates promulgated a national clinical epidemiologic experiment using “social distancing” and “face mask wearing” in a healthy population without establishing any clinical trial outcomes, without empaneling an Institutional Review Board, defining “informed consent”, and without reviewing the ethics of such experiment in contravention to the Declaration of Helsinki and 21 C.F.R. §50.20 ff, and provided guidance to Governors of the 50 states of the United States to carry out said experiment without any independently considered ethical review board finding.

According to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses’ (ICTV) Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG) publication on March 2, 2020, the preliminary data suggesting that there was sufficient variation to determine this as a novel virus vs. a mutation of known coronaviruses was not based on established scientific principles but was responsive to the World Health Organization’s prior unfounded declaration of novelty of both the virus and a new disease.

There could be no independent verification of the epidemiologic models predicting dire infection and mortality rates as the underlying models and data were not published, and when sought, were reportedly corrupted so as to make their examination impossible.

In violation of State law, no medical or scientific evidence was provided to establish causal links between the SARS CoV-2 and the symptoms of COVID-19 relying instead on foreign government hearsay and conjecture to conflate association with causation.

Based on the recommendation of the CDC, NIAID and the Conspiring Associates, no State official reviewed for accuracy or veracity any of the causal statements made in the Declaration of Emergency which contain false, misleading, and terror inducing statements.

In violation of well-established legal precedent from Jew Ho v. Williamson, 103 F. 10, 26 (C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900) and subsequent public health law, arbitrary and capricious rules were insinuated on part of the population that were not applied generally resulting in the unlawful confinement of a healthy population with no basis in science.

The CDC and its affiliated organizations have routinely conflated infection endpoints from RT-PCR and serology.

Have repeatedly reported data from flawed or unsubstantiated models projecting morbidity and mortality data for the inducement of terror in the general population in violation of §802 of the Patriot Act’s prohibition of Domestic Terrorism and, through this action, have sought to coerce a population and influence a government.

Protocols for Californians ignore Germ Theory being a theory, Gain of Function, Duel Use Research (sensitive material sold to highest bidder), contagion theory being a theory, A World Without Risk, Event 201, the Georgia Guidestones, the Rockefeller Papers, and more.






No comments:

Post a Comment