Friday, March 18, 2022

Notice of Claim-Suing Ferrer Personally




I learned that officials in California are not bonded...unless I ran into a lie.  At any rate, I had to abandon my previous thought...to place a lien on Ferrer's bond...and go after her personally.  (Yes, they may let her go and then it will be hard for me to find her, but I have to do something.)

Please use this as a template, making yours a little different compared to mine, and go after your local health director.  Do a search to see dates and quotes of tyranny against you and fellow dwellers.  Be certain to make a footer including your name (last, first), Notice of Claim, the registered mail number and page numbers. Print it on Ivory Linen 24 pound paper.  Have your witnesses sign it and then use red ink on their left and right thumb prints on either side of their signature, if they are comfortable with that. If you have a seal, use it and your thumb prints.  If you use a postage stamp for the registered mail, that is fine, perhaps just state, last, first names on letter.  Do not go into the living man things that I say.  Even a "legal fiction" can make a statement and appear as living man simply through using registered mail as court.

If you know how, send this with your signature (instead of a stamp) and state that you are living mankind or however you state that you are under Natural Law.

However you send Notices for court, make certain that you write the registered mail number in red at the top.  Have the worker bop (stamp) the first page and the first page of a copy of this letter for the judge later. (The judge is also done through the mail, not in a physical building.)

I do not use a Firm Book, but that is your choice if that is something you use.

It is important that they start seeing huge numbers of protest in this manner.  They will not give up either way, but perhaps we can let the air out of their sail…implode their Agenda from the inside.  Even the most vilest entity follows rules.  It is the craziest thing!  We mere little humans just have to figure out how.

Now, go. Anchor the Light.  Hwa!




Notice of Claim

Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent

Reference Registered mail # RE 000 000 000 US

 

19 March 2022

 

Affiant:

Jones, Jane-living mankind; sui juris

c/o #### Street

City, California

Non-domestic, zip exempt

Without UNITED STATES

 

Respondent:

Dr. Barbara Ferrer

313 N. Figueroa Street

Los Angeles, CA 90012

 

Statement of Facts:

1.     10 March 2020, Respondent announced that mask-wearing mandates were probable and by 1 April 2020, news reported Respondent saying that when it came to masks as a form of coronavirus prevention, people with the virus could potentially spread it 48 hours before they showed any symptoms, and “there may be a benefit” for people to wear a mask when going out in public.

https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2020/04/01/coronavirus-covid-la-county-face-masks-flu/.

2.     22 June 2020, Respondent announced, “COVID-19 has upended thousands and thousands of lives all across the nation. The virus has changed our world as we know it, and people are angry. As of today, 83,397 cases have been reported in Los Angeles County and 3,120 people have died from this virus”

http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/phcommon/public/media/mediapubhpdetail.cfm?prid=2457.

3.     As early as September 2020, Respondent worked towards the people of Los Angeles County having the SafePass implemented.  She said, “Contact tracing relies on residents sharing with us key information to identify close contacts, and today we are adding additional capacity for our program through SafePass, to identify when people are in ‘close contact’ with each other,” and  Respondent is pleased that SafePass can help “us slow the spread of COVID-19”

                 https://covid19.lacounty.gov/covid19-news/la-county-city-leaders-join-forces-citizen-launch-safepass-partnership/.

4.     30 December 2021, Reporters announced, “Los Angeles County Health Director Barbara Ferrer said Thursday that unvaccinated people in the county are 14 times more likely to die from COVID-19 than those that have been fully vaccinated,” andVaccines continue to offer an extraordinary level of protection against hospitalizations and against the worst of all outcomes - passing away”

https://abc7.com/covid-19-vaccine-los-angeles-county-coronavirus-dr-barbara-ferrer-la-public-health/11408759/.

5.     August and September 2021, Respondent supported SafePassLA, which required the covid vaccination for people entering indoor places because “Los Angeles County is and has remained at a level of high community transmission.”

https://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2021/21-0878_ord_draft_10-06-21.pdf

6.     4 March 2022, Respondent announced the end of mask mandates, but added, that those “attending indoor mega-events of 1,000 or more people -- such as sporting events -- will still be required to show proof of COVID vaccination or a recent negative test [such as PCR or rapid] to be admitted. Vaccine verification or a negative test will also still be required for workers at health care facilities and congregate-care facilities”

                  https://kfiam640.iheart.com/content/2022-03-04-la-county-mask-mandate-to-end-today-as-covid-metrics-improve/.

 

7.     14 March 2022, Respondent said, “As is the case with any new variant or subvariant, the biggest question will be whether available COVID-19 vaccines will still provide a high degree of protection. But with such small numbers of deltacron nationwide, it's hard to get an answer to that question at this time,” so she is acknowledging variants. https://mtstandard.com/news/national/deltacron-is-a-hybrid-of-delta-and-omicron-variants-how-worried-should-we-be/article_a4d3d61a-4bbe-5bce-97ed-04526a41a1fa.html

8.     14 March 2022, Respondent is reported to have said, “I'm very clear about what I think is the safest way to get through the next few weeks, and that is to go ahead and keep a mask on” https://mtstandard.com/news/national/deltacron-is-a-hybrid-of-delta-and-omicron-variants-how-worried-should-we-be/article_a4d3d61a-4bbe-5bce-97ed-04526a41a1fa.html.

 

Statement of Claim:

Pursuant to Title 42 US Code, Section 1983, the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured,” Affiant charges Respondent of harming and traumatizing her for two years.  This harm occurred by Respondent claiming a natural, contagious virus exists, that mask-wearing protects people from it, that a covid-19 vaccination offers protection, that unmasked and non-vaccinated are harming others and themselves, all without any proof, which has caused discrimination against Affiant and a hostile environment toward her. To rebut this claim where damages will be sought from Respondent personally for operating out of the scope and purview of her Office, please provide the following:

·        produce evidence that SARS-COV2 (and all its names ie: coronavirus that is natural, contagious and harmful; covid-19 that is natural, contagious and harmful) has been isolated not using PCR—which is not a test and cannot isolate a virus—nor by a computer-generated guess, but definitive proof that a natural virus has been isolated that is a contagion.

·        produce all records describing the isolation of a SARS-COV2 virus, directly from a sample taken from an expired body, where the patient sample was not put with any other source of genetic material, for example fetal calf serum, hepatocytes, monkey kidney epithelial cells (Cercopithecus aethiops), or the like. To be clear, “isolation” means the act of separating a thing from everything else.  I am not requesting records where “isolation of SARS-COV2” refers to a culturing of a thing, or how something such as the PCR functions related to this or a sequencing of a thing.  To clarify, I am requesting all such records that are in the possession, custody or control of your office or a U. S. federal department whether downloaded to a computer or device, printed in a hard copy, or held in some fashion.

·        Provide evidence of variants from isolating them and showing the evolution from the original SARS-COV2 virus.

·        produce records that the isolate (from SARS-COV2 and variants) is harmful to humans and is transmissible.

·        provide evidence on subjects who have received any of the covid vaccines proving that they do not transmit the virus.  Please include all subjects who started the study.  Please do not call only two out of two one hundred percent.  Please state your answer on subjects by their number, ie 100 who received the shot were around 100 non-receivers of the shot.  Twenty of the non-shot receivers became ill and the natural pathogen was isolated from them.  Also state how many and which company’s shot(s) was or were received by those who had the shot.

·        provide evidence on subjects who have received any of the covid vaccines proving that they cannot “catch” the virus.  Again, an example would be 100 who received this shot were placed in a room with 100 ill patients for X amount of time.  The 100 ill patients had the isolate to prove they were sick with a natural, contagious virus. None of the vaccinated became ill. 

·        provide evidence that proves that segregating the population who have not received this pharmaceutical from those who have stops the spread of the natural, contagious virus that has been isolated.

·        provide evidence that proves that the masked population, who have been proven to not have the natural isolate, when around 100 with the isolate proven to be within them, has stopped the spread of the natural, contagious virus that has been isolated. Do not include computer simulations.

·        provide evidence that a non-masked population who have been proven to not have the isolate, “catch” it when socializing with 100 people who have been proven to have the isolate.  How many in the non-masked group got sick?

            Please limit your search of the above items from October 2019 to March 2022.  If Respondent has no proof of an isolate, please provide an Affidavit of Truth that Respondent has never seen, held or known of said isolate.

 

 

Opportunity to Cure

 

 Jones, Jane  (Affiant) grants Dr. Barbara Ferrer (Respondent) twenty (20) business days, exclusive of the day of receipt, to respond to the claim with proof of a non-lab-made virus isolate, or an Affidavit of Truth that she has never seen, held or known of said isolate, or Affiant will seek $10,000 per day from Respondent personally from the twentieth business day until the date of judgment for her suffering. Failure to respond will constitute, as an operation of law, Respondent’s admission and agreement to the statements and claims made by Affiant through tacit procuration pertaining to the Notice of Claim, and the whole matter shall be deemed res judicata and stare decisis. Response by Respondent must be served on Affiant as provided below/overleaf and using Registered and traceable mail service:

 

 

 

Jane Jones

c/o #### Street

City, CA [RFD #####]

 

Jones, Jane (Affiant) awaits Dr. Barbara Ferrer’s (Respondent’s) timely response.

 

“I, living mankind commonly known as Jane Jones (Affiant), certify that I have read the above and do know that the facts contained are true, correct and complete, not misleading, the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.”

 

Yours Truly,

 

By: ________________________________________________________(Affiant)

All Rights Reserved                                     

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                     

Acknowledgment For verification purposes only

 

Sworn to me by Jones, Jane (Affiant), known to me and proven to me to be the real living mankind signing this affidavit this ___________________ day of ___________________, 20_____. WITNESS my hand.

 

 

________________________________

(Witness)

                                                                                                                                                            

 

 

 

________________________________

(Witness)

 

 Last thoughts:

1)     Here is an example of one way to write the Footer.

Jane, Jones, Affiant. Dr. Barbara Ferrer, Respondent. Notice of Claim #RE 000 000 000 US. Page 1 of 4.

2)     I peel the second copy of the number off the Registered mail slip (that I stick to the envelope) and stick it on the green return with signature card.  If on some letter, I am not using a green card, I stick the number onto my copy of the letter for my records or the judge.  The typed # is already there, but as further proof, this is where I keep it, right under the typed #. (But usually, I send a green card stuck to the back of my letter.)

1)     No, if there existed a natural, contagious pathogen, Ferrer and company have no right to take away my Rights.  I am capable of behaving as a responsible, living man.  It is easier to sue her since she lied, though.  She not only supported taking away my Rights, she did it with a lie.

1)     In my opinion, it is alright to have the copy for the judge on regular paper; however, your correspondence to him or her would be on the Ivory Linen paper.

1)     I sign the backs of the papers in case they are face down on their desk.

2)     I sign in blue or black pen simply because in legal documents…and middle school and high school…they were the accepted colors.  I prefer blue for signatures because it gives a little more color to the very black-inked paper.  The copy is very black all over, except for the bop (stamp).

Before I understood that it is all pre-paid.

htpps://chasnqi.blogspot.com/2019/12/two-jurisdictions-within-each-state.html

https://chasnqi.blogspot.com/2019/12/envelope-markings-explained.html


3/29/22 added:



My tracking still shows that this letter has not arrived and yet I have received a response. They received it on March 22nd.


I wonder why I should do so immediately.

915 a 

https://law.justia.com/codes/california/2009/gov/915-915.4.html


The only success I have had is that in two years of writing to the LA County Public Health office, I finally got a response.


This county council member is to retire 3/31/22.




I have a plan. 





 

                                                                                                                                       

No comments:

Post a Comment