Jones, Jane
c/o #### Street
City,
California #### #### #### #### #### (certified mail #)
25
April 2022
Attorney
General Bonta
CA
Department of Justice
PO
Box 944255
Sacramento,
CA 94244-2550
Re:
Judge Mizelle’s ruling against masks when traveling
Dear Attorney General Bonta:
You Sir knew that you had state Citizens dwelling here
who have not waived any God Given Constitutionally Protected Rights even before
the April 18th ruling allowing citizen-slaves to remove masks when
traveling. Being in the field of law,
you either knew or should have known that there were no legal words on paper compelling people to smother
themselves, yet with all my letters to you, you consistently stood back
allowing those in charge around me to mistreat me. You need to publicly speak
out against tyrant groups such as the County of Los Angeles Public Health. They have not updated their Travel Guidance and
are still making it difficult for travelers who never waived their Rights in
the first place.
Because of your
education, responsibilities, and duties, you either knew or should have known
that mask regulations, no matter what they were called, were established from interpretive
rulemaking rather than the lawful Notice and Comment route. Together with this, you knew I demanded all
of my Rights at all times and have expected you to inform those below you. Yet, Californian authorities at airports and bus drivers are still ignorant.
Having said all of that, the next time illegal “regulations” come into play where citizen-slaves are told what to do, please already have protocols in place—through having informed those below you such as local police—for state Citizens who have not waived their Rights. On the occasion agents of the government and the for-profit CDC institute propaganda and heavy-handedness, travelers in California choosing not to follow illegal rules (as with the masks) that they see as harmful to their health, would appreciate alternatives already in place. Protocols for any conveyance related to public traveling needs to have a method assuring easy movement for those who do not waive their Rights, otherwise you unlawfully go against Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them,” and Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (1803), “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”
Responsible men and women who do not need to be
parented and have the lawful paperwork placing them in the realm of being free
to advance decisions for wellbeing by choosing to not cover this nostril, that
nostril, simultaneously with this mouth, for example, would appreciate a way to
communicate with all appropriate personnel—no matter what the intended power
over travelers was to be.
Given under my hand,
Jones, Jane
This link will eventually be updated. But note that an important ruling occurred on April 18th and it is being ignored by the tyrants of LA.
http://www.publichealth.lacounty.gov/media/coronavirus/traveladvisory.htm
TRAVEL GUIDANCE
Updated March 18, 2022
Significant Updates
- 3-21-22: Updated to align with CDC statement that persons who have tested positive for COVID-19 may not travel for a full 10 days after their symptoms started (or after the date of the first positive test if they had no symptoms).
COVID-19 remains a threat to our local and global community. Travelers should make sure that they are up to date with their COVID-19 vaccines, meaning they are fully vaccinated and received their booster dose, if eligible, prior to travel. Travelers should continue to take precautions to reduce the risk of COVID-19 such as masking, physical distancing,
Added 5/18/2023: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ban3A_BLbzc
No comments:
Post a Comment