If you are interested,
you may use these letters as a template for a letter that you could write. Think of a transportation issue you had
related to masks and see if a letter would be appropriate. My intention is if I hold common law court with them over an issue related to jurisdiction in the future, I can bring it up that I
did suggest they look into other ideas and allow us to communicate with them.
Jones, Jane
c/o ####
Street
City, California
19 April
2022
Southwest Airlines
Gary Kelly, Executive
Chair at SW Airlines
2702 Love Field Drive,
Dallas,
TX 75235
Dear Mr. Kelly:
I am writing to inquire about the protocols that you will have in place the next time United States District Court judges are slow to chastise certain entities that exceed their authority by ignoring Notice of Proposal and other procedures. SW Airlines travelers choosing to “support personal wellbeing” (as reported by CNN)—the next time agents of the government and the for-profit CDC institute propaganda and heavy-handedness—would appreciate such protocols. Protocols that go against Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them,” and Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (1803), “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void,” are counter to those who have not waived their Natural Rights. Responsible men and women who do not need to be parented and have the lawful paperwork placing them in the realm of being free to “support personal wellbeing” by choosing to not cover this nostril, simultaneously with that nostril, simultaneously with this mouth would appreciate a way to communicate with all of your staff the next go-round. Thank you so much.
Bright Day Thoughts,
Jones,
Jane
"Southwest Airlines, meanwhile, said on its website that employees and customers could 'choose whether they would like to wear a mask, and we encourage individuals to make the best decision to support their personal wellbeing.'" https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/18/business/airlines-masks/index.html
4/19/2022 added
In taking a quick look
at social media and the media, it is easy to see that the masked, scared
portion of humanity are saying that the judge who stopped masks with travel is
a Trumpster and therefore, they are nullifying her word. According to Roger Sayles, the opponent of
humanity started words on paper without following Due Process. The public was not Noticed and given an
opportunity for Comment. There is a whole process that was supposed to take
place, which didn’t. (As we were saying
all along, mask-wearing by force was unlawful.) https://www.federalregister.gov/uploads/2011/01/the_rulemaking_process.pdf
I sent these letters from my home using the Judicial District with Registered mail.
19 April
2022
Long
Beach Airport
Cynthia
Guidry-Director
4100
East Donald Douglas Drive, Second Floor
Long
Beach, CA 90808
Dear Ms. Guidry:
Thank you for having
Deputy Director Lopez-Rios respond to my letter of November 2021. This time, I am writing to inquire about the regulations
that you will have in place the next time United States District Court judges
are slow to chastise certain entities that exceed their authority by ignoring the
rulemaking process. Long Beach Airport travelers
choosing not to follow illegal rules (as with the masks) that they see as
harmful to their health—the next time agents of the government and the
for-profit CDC institute propaganda and heavy-handedness—would appreciate such alternatives. Protocols that go against Miranda vs.
Arizona, 384 US 436, “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved,
there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them,” and
Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (1803), “All laws which are repugnant to the
Constitution are null and void,” are counter to travelers who have not waived
their Natural Rights. Responsible men
and women who do not need to be parented and have the lawful paperwork placing
them in the realm of being free to advance decisions for wellbeing by choosing
to not cover this nostril, that nostril, simultaneously with this mouth, would
appreciate a way to communicate with all of your staff the next go-round—no
matter what the concept for power over travelers is to be. Thank you.
Bright Day Thoughts,
19 April 2022
Wally
Hebeish, Chief of Police
411 West Ocean Blvd,
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dear Police Chief Hebeish:
Congratulations on your new appointment! I apologize that I have not sent my affidavit
into you as I did with Police Chief Luna, and therefore, this correspondence is
out of order. It is; however, timely
given the verdict on mask-wearing with travel.
I am writing to inquire about the regulations that
you will have in place the next time United States District Court judges are
slow to chastise certain entities that exceed their authority by ignoring the
rulemaking process. Mask-wearing rules
were inappropriate since no public Notice and other procedures were followed. Long Beach Airport travelers choosing not
to follow illegal rules (as with the masks) that they see as harmful to their
health—the next time agents of the government and the for-profit CDC institute
propaganda and heavy-handedness—would appreciate such alternatives. Protocols that go against Miranda vs.
Arizona, 384 US 436, “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved,
there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them,” and
Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (1803), “All laws which are repugnant to the
Constitution are null and void,” are counter to travelers who have not waived
their Natural Rights. Responsible men
and women who do not need to be parented and have the lawful paperwork placing
them in the realm of being free to advance decisions for wellbeing by choosing
to not cover this nostril, that nostril, simultaneously with this mouth, would
appreciate a way to communicate with all of your staff, especially at
the airport, the next go-round—no matter what the concept for power over
travelers is to be. Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment