Special shout out to David Martin World and Mike Freeman for some of the information used here. Please feel free to take what you want and construct your own letter to your governor.
I tried to send 5,700 characters of the below in an e-mail, but Newsom's e-mail would not accept it. It kept telling me I had 12,000 characters when I had edited a version on my computer to be certain it would be accepted. Interesting. (Same experience with past letters to him.) At any rate, this letter went through the post with my signature as the stamp outside the District of Columbia. All words were spelled correctly in the original letter. Here, I am trying to avoid the AI bots.
Gov. Gavin Newsom
1303 10th Street, Suite
1173
Sacramento, CA 95814
Dear Gov. Newsom:
Until you can prove
publicly that a natural, wild C*VID-19 is floating around in the air, that it
can be isolated from an infected person, and that it is contagious, please stop
all experiments associated with COV*D-19 in California. They are harmful and people of California
deserve better.
Currently, staff and students are tested
for CO*ID-19 before being permitted on school campuses when both the rapid
antigen test and the PCR have on the label, as well as on each individually
wrapped swab, that each swab was sterilized with ethylene oxide, a
cancer-causing agent.
How dare you place us, especially our children, in harm’s way. Further, testing healthy people for a problem
is like giving healthy people the pertussis swab down the throat on a weekly
basis. It is criminal, unnecessary, and
experimental, but to subject these kids to this chemical on a weekly basis,
when prior to receiving this threat they were heathy, is unconscionable. How can you stand back, allowing this to
happen? Code Federal Regulations, Section
50.20 says, “No investigator may involve a human being as a subject in research
covered by these regulations unless the investigator has obtained the legally
effective informed consent of the subject or the subject’s legally authorized
representative.” These children, their parents, and the staff have not been
informed that they are participating in an experiment on multiple levels: 1) regularly
mass testing asymptomatic, healthy individuals, 2) regular exposure to ethylene
oxide, 3) regularly retrieving genetic material when no-one can definitively know
from whence it came.
Even the maker of the PCR said this
process is not looking for an exact virus.
It looks for genetic debris and not even commercialized scientists can
say how that debris got there. (A
person’s own cell may have tried to balance itself, making a byproduct called a
virus, for instance. That debris is from
the immune system working, not an outside attack.) Show proof of your claim that a C*VID-19 that
is natural, wild, and floating around in the air has been isolated. Next, show proof that this “test” can isolate
that from a person and say it is there.
Lastly, show proof that this test is safe and safe on a weekly
basis. If you cannot do these three
requests, then you have no right requiring that those living, working, and
attending school in California must succumb to the C*VID-19 so-called test.
Alongside this, if you cannot show proof
of your claim that a virus known as natural, wild C*VID-19 has been isolated,
then you need to announce that there is no pandemic in California and all
associated requirements to the myth and all of those arrested or fined due to
the myth should be freed and released of all obligations associated with the
myth. People of California need you to take their side in this. Please do not abandon us.
Here is some information on how this is an
experiment. The private for-profit corporation known as
the CDC sought, filed, and received a patent on April 25, 2003 which made the
identification, the detection, and detection kits for coronavirus not available
to the general population. They, by virtue of that act, by filing that patent,
made it impossible for the public health interests to be served. That was the
beginning. In 2007, they extended their
patent filing to actually patent the virus, which is against 35 US Code section
101. The reason I mention this is that testing could have been going on with
so-called sick people for years. Testing
healthy people now is inappropriate, especially in light of this information.
In 2013-2018 they worked to use international
sources to take the research on Gain of Function off-shore, because it had been
determined (by the National Institute of Health in 2013) to be unethical. They
decided to work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology so they could get around
the ethical and legal implications of the work being done here in the US. They did that willfully so that in September
2019 in the publication World at Risk from the World Health
Organization, Dr. Anthony Fauci and the members of the committee actually
affiliated with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, making a recommendation
that a respiratory based pathogen simulation must be run. With no institutional review board review,
with no independent physician certifying that their actions were legal, they
avoided the exclusions of Section 50.24 of the 21 Code of Regulations. Meaning, in this instance, they cannot experiment
on us, because there has been no institutional review board. There is no
independent doctor.* This so-called
pandemic is the simulation!
You either did not research or you are
complicit in the crime against humanity.
At any rate, now that you are aware of an engineered virus, you know
that the average person is not where the so-called COV*D-19 starts or ends. Further, being an experiment on humanity,
Govind Persad, Assistant Law Professor at the University of Denver, stated that
experiments need to be socially as well as scientifically valuable. Those
involved with the experiment need to be respected. The risks and benefits to
the participants needs to be weighed against the benefit to society. An outside
review of the ethics of the experiment is needed. This C*VID-19 psy-op has been
nothing but political. It has not been socially beneficial. Participants are
not being respected. The COV*D-19 test
is the clearest example of that since it goes after destroying the health of our
youngest and most vulnerable.
Please publicly show proof of your claim that
there is a natural, wild virus so scientists and doctors not affiliated with
Big Pharma may dispute it, or publicly remove COV*D-19 testing and all the
other experiments (mask-wearing, physically distancing, etc.) from California
completely. Thank-you.
In Truth,
Paget Hillebrand
*April 25, 2003, the CDC sought
to patent the “Coronavirus Isolated from Humans” in violation of 35 U.S.C. §101
which prohibits patenting nature.
In addition to their attempt to
patent the coronavirus associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
(SARS), they received patent rights to the detection and the manufacturing of a
kit to measure fragments of the virus and their awarded claims were granted on
August 17, 2010 in U.S. Patent 7,776,521 (the “Patent”).
CDC, NIAID and their Conspiring
Associates variously conducted descriptive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and Gain
of Function (engineered virus made to be more pathogenic and contagious)
research on coronavirus and such research would have required the use or
infringement of the Patent at U.S. taxpayer expense in various grants
including, but not limited to, U19 AI109761; R01 AI 108197; R01 AI132178; P30
DK065988; U19 AI109680, and other grants.
In September of 2019, Dr.
Anthony Fauci of the NIAID and Dr. Chris Elias, President, Global Development
Program for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, USA in their capacity as
member of the World Health Organization’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board
in their capacities as agents of NIAID and Conspiring Associates mandated that
“the United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training
and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of
a lethal respiratory pathogen.”
On or about January 21, 2020,
the U.S. reported its first case of coronavirus in Washington thought to be
linked to what foreign sources had described as a “new” coronavirus.
On January 31, 2020, HHS
Secretary Alex M. Azar II, relying on information provided by foreign sources,
declared a Public Health Emergency for the United States.
On February 4, 2020, the United
States Food and Drug Administration granted the CDC Emergency Use Authorization
for a kit to detect coronavirus infection for which they provided no public
notice regarding the establishment of an Institutional Review Board “with the
concurrence of a licensed physician who is a member of or consultant to the IRB
and is not otherwise participating in the clinical investigation” as required
under 21 C.F.R. §50.24.
On February 10, 2020, Dr.
Anthony Fauci and Conspiring Associates were reported to discuss the financial
benefit of the public becoming more committed to supporting research on
coronaviruses in the article entitled, “Fluctuating funding and flagging
interest hurt coronavirus research, leaving crucial knowledge gaps.”
On contravention to established,
peer-reviewed medical science, the CDC, NIAID, and Conspiring Associates
promulgated a national clinical epidemiologic experiment using “social
distancing” and “face mask wearing” in a healthy population without
establishing any clinical trial outcomes, without empaneling an Institutional
Review Board, defining “informed consent”, and without reviewing the ethics of
such experiment in contravention to the Declaration of Helsinki and 21 C.F.R.
§50.20 ff, and provided guidance to Governors of the 50 states of the United
States to carry out said experiment without any independently considered
ethical review board finding.
According to the International
Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses’ (ICTV) Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG)
publication on March 2, 2020, the preliminary data suggesting that there was
sufficient variation to determine this as a novel virus vs. a mutation of known
coronaviruses was not based on established scientific principles but was
responsive to the World Health Organization’s prior unfounded declaration of
novelty of both the virus and a new disease.
There could be no independent
verification of the epidemiologic models predicting dire infection and
mortality rates as the underlying models and data were not published, and when
sought, were reportedly corrupted so as to make their examination impossible.
In violation of State law, no
medical or scientific evidence was provided to establish causal links between
the SARS CoV-2 and the symptoms of COVID-19 relying instead on foreign
government hearsay and conjecture to conflate association with causation.
Based on the recommendation of
the CDC, NIAID and the Conspiring Associates, no State official reviewed for
accuracy or veracity any of the causal statements made in the Declaration of
Emergency which contain false, misleading, and terror inducing statements.
In violation of well-established
legal precedent from Jew Ho v. Williamson, 103 F. 10, 26 (C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900)
and subsequent public health law, arbitrary and capricious rules were
insinuated on part of the population that were not applied generally resulting
in the unlawful confinement of a healthy population with no basis in science.
The CDC and its affiliated
organizations have routinely conflated infection endpoints from RT-PCR and
serology.
Have repeatedly reported data
from flawed or unsubstantiated models projecting morbidity and mortality data
for the inducement of terror in the general population in violation of §802 of
the Patriot Act’s prohibition of Domestic Terrorism and, through this action,
have sought to coerce a population and influence a government.
Protocols for Californians
ignore Germ Theory being a theory, Gain of Function, Duel Use Research
(sensitive material sold to highest bidder), contagion theory being a theory, A
World Without Risk, Event 201, the Georgia Guidestones, the Rockefeller Papers,
and more.
