["Masks are
preparing you for the social credit system. You have to wear a mask to enter
the store and people comply without questioning any aspect of this. People are
snitching on and especially fearing others who are not wearing masks. In the
social credit system, AI/ SMART devices will spy on you and deduct or add
credits accordingly. The mask-wearers feel comfortable around other mask
wearers and would be gaining credits; the non-mask wearers would be losing
credits from the AI government. In the future, if you don't have enough credit,
you will be shut out of the store. Perhaps you may enter, but only have enough
credits for the harmful non-live foods made in a lab.
If you weren't
programmed to wear a mask, then you would have questioned it. First and
foremost, is it safe? According to Dr. Mikovitz if you have been infected
either through lab work or by having been injected with v*ccines, then wearing
a mask is not safe. The mask causes re-infection. Oxygen deprivation is another
real risk. Claustrophobia sufferers would be triggered and sent off balance.
Next, is wearing a
mask effective against the innate coronavirus (common cold), lab-tweaked
viruses that were injected, or other biowarfare disseminated from drones or
planes? While we're discussing protection from external sources, does the mask
protect you from the harmful frequencies of fourth generation towers, f*fth generation antennas, or
the cell phone in your hand or pocket?
Lastly, is a mask
necessary? Have scientists and doctors taken a group of people with masks and
exposed them to a pathogen while another group went mask-less with the
pathogen? Specifically, if they've convinced you that they've isolated this
pathogen that is being called covid-19, then have they tested two groups
against that specific pathogen? If these tests have been done, were they Big
Pharma sponsored? You may say it's
ridiculous to test a mask in these situations, but I ask you, where's the proof
that the masks you have seen while waiting in line at a store have been proven
safe, effective, or necessary? Could this simply be training just like there's
no reason to take healthy babies to a doctor constantly, but it trains the
parents to bring the kids in for shots?
Granted, you may be of
the Germ Theory school of thought, but it's inappropriate to force that theory
down everyone's throat. This first wave of Plandemic 2020 hasn't even been
proven to be a non-man-made attack, yet. People have the right under Natural
Law to trust their internal terrain. The mask is a step to take humans away
from Natural Law and community. It's away to assure separation and judgement
and condemnation of the non-mask-wearers for what they are perceived to be
doing to the victims (those programmed to accept their bodies are weak).
Does the mask offer
you security as you ingest pounds of sugar daily? Does the mask give you
permission to not exercise? Is the mask your savoir and protector so you can go
on watching hours and hours of television daily, day in and day out? Is it the
non-mask-wearer's fault that you are unwell? The social credit system is
counting on you being this sort of slave who will react and judge and
fear...and comply.
ID 2020 used to be far
away.
Today, it's on the
other side of your mask.
Now, go. Get de-programmed.
Hwa!"
-Paget Anne of
Essendon]
No comments:
Post a Comment