Does the water mine image
elicit fear? Is fear the goal in order to sell a va(cine, a pharmaceutical, a
narrative, or all three?
Please read this next
part as it is important to this discussion, because your trusted sources have vilified
people such as me who needed proof of a “pandemic” before it was given any credence
at all. Is it wrong to seek proof before offering credit to something?
I have spent the last two
years writing to officials and healthcare directors for proof of the isolate
known as “covid-19.” If it exists, why wasn’t proof provided? Here’s an excerpt
of how I posed my request, in case you think I asked in an incomplete way.
“I am requesting that you provide
proof that “covid” has been isolated and is not simply a computer-generated
simulation. I ask you to please provide me with a copy of the following items:
·
produce
evidence that SARS-COV2 (and all its names ie: coronavirus that is natural,
contagious and harmful; covid-19 that is natural, contagious and harmful) has
been isolated not using PCR—which is not a test and cannot isolate a virus—nor
by a computer-generated guess, but definitive proof that a natural virus has
been isolated that is a contagion.
·
produce
all records describing the isolation of a SARS-COV2 virus, directly from a
sample taken from an expired body, where the patient sample was not put with
any other source of genetic material, for example hepatocytes, monkey kidney
epithelial cells (Cercopithecus aethiops), or the like. To be clear,
“isolation” means the act of separating a thing from everything else. I am not requesting records where “isolation
of SARS-COV2” refers to a culturing of a thing, or how something such as the
PCR functions related to this or a sequencing of a thing. To clarify, I am requesting all such records
that are in the possession, custody or control of your office or a U. S.
federal department whether downloaded to a computer or device, printed in a
hard copy, or held in some fashion.
·
produce
records that the isolate is contagious and harmful to humans
·
provide
evidence on subjects who have received any of the covid vaccines proving that
they do not transmit the virus. Please
include all subjects who started the study.
Please do not call only two out of two one hundred percent. Please state your answer on subjects by their
number, ie 100 who received the shot were around 100 non-receivers of the
shot. Twenty of the non-shot receivers
became ill and the pathogen was isolated from them. Also state how many and which company’s
shot(s) was or were received by those who had the shot.
·
provide
evidence on subjects who have received any of the covid vaccines proving that
they cannot “catch” the virus. Again, an
example would be 100 who received this shot were placed in a room with 100 ill
patients for X amount of time. None
became ill. The 100 ill patients had the
isolate to prove they were sick with a natural, contagious virus.
·
provide
evidence that proves that segregating the population who have not received this
pharmaceutical from those who have stops the spread of the natural, contagious
virus that has been isolated.
Important to the “c*vid” topic is who are the officials, doctors and scientists that you trusted with the information you received? Are they commercial scientists or freelance? Are they affiliated with a university or freelance? Search out each individual. Has Big Pharma offered money to them ever or now? Who sponsors their opposition? If you trust a paid opinion over a freelance opinion, how come?
Has Germ Theory ever graduated from being a theory? Is it possible you were trained to believe in “germs” and helplessness to them by news, movies and other programs?
Is virology a
settled science or do many arguments and discussions ensue about it? Did you
decide a “virus” is a natural, contagious attacker because you saw real proof
or because you heard it on a media platform? In the beginning of 2021, I witnessed three people becoming
ill on three successive days. We were together on Zoom, but alone in our homes. “Yup, something’s going around.” I was the only one out of many who brought it to their
attention that they did not make each other sick. Their programming was so
complete that lack of health had nothing to do with their choices (in food,
exercise, detoxing programs, etc.). It was ONLY that another human could MAKE them
sick. If a human is helpless and woes are somebody else's fault, victimhood is satisfied.
Are you concerned that
authority figures will be displeased with you if you search for answers? What
voice is in your head making you wrong for stepping away to investigate
yourself…For stepping away from your friends and loved ones to think for a moment?
If it isn’t safe to hold different opinions, is what you fear solitude? Are you
afraid that no-one would like you for questioning an accepted view?
It is time to answer these questions over calling those who have searched to find an isolated natural, contagious virus “conspiracy theorists.”
Onto the PCR tool.
Let us look at the
package holding the swab that is to be shoved up your nose to come into contact
with very delicate tissue. The
swabs used in the “c*vid test” are sterilized using ethylene oxide—a cancer
causing, sterilizing agent. To place this inside your nose repeatedly cannot
possibly support health. A lot of the information supporting this statement has
been removed, but this is still up.
Use the four (or more) search engines to investigate this for yourself).
https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causesprevention/risk/substances/ethylene-oxide
and
https://www.cancer.gov/aboutcancer/causesprevention/risk/substances/ethylene-oxide
The inventor of the PCR said it may not be used as a test.
https://www.brighteon.com/7ccc08b5-3ccc-479d-8c75-34f6c2ee846f. PCR tools are not searching for a “c*vid,” they are identifying pieces of DNA
and RNA that have occurred within the life of that body and cannot say
definitively what it means. Depending on how many cycles it is spun,
results will vary, yet swabs are placed up both nostrils, potentially exposing
the other side to what the first side may be experiencing, bacterial for
example. This ritual is useless and pointless, unless a sinister reason
exists for the tool being used in this fashion.
The PCR tool is used to
assist in solving crimes. For instance, a suspect’s boot has one drop of blood on
it. If it can be proven that it is from the brutally murdered female near to
where he was seen, they can conclude that he was present when her blood was
spurting upon her death. The PCR takes that one drop and multiplies it so they
have enough material to work with.
Pretending it identifies a
natural, contagious virus is stretching the parameters of this tool, especially
in light of no natural, contagious virus having ever been isolated. Isn’t it time to stop trusting the opponent
to humanity? Isn’t it time to start looking into what is called virology and
all the “tools” used to keep this religion going?
If you locate a natural,
contagious virus, please post the proof in the comments below. No Health Departments
the world over has been able to do so. Thank you!