I have treated people when they
are in another area in the States of the Union or a different country compared
to me. This is called distance healing
and it has everything to do with energy and nothing to do with a “virtual
acupuncture treatment,” which apparently became a thing during the Covid Era
2020. I must really be out of it. This is a new thing to me! In the July 2021 issue of Acupuncture
Today, advice is given to acupuncturists on how to grow a virtual practice,
which means treatments over the computer without the two humans being in
contact with one another. I am appalled. This is not something to “grow.” It might be helpful in some instances here
and there; however, it should not replace an in-person treatment. How about growing a wellness practice—a light-bearer
acupuncture practice?
Yes, have your EMF-poisoned
patient sitting at a computer. That
sounds like great advice. I make that
leap, that all patients are EMF-poisoned, because most of our clients are
inundated with Wi-Fi 24/7, have a SMART meter on a wall of their homes, have
multiple cell phones and possibly other SMART devices about. Most people work or play on a computer or
their phones at least part of the day, or both.
Now, we expect them to see us through a screen offering them directions
on what to do. Yikes! No more human to human contact for you,
deary. We cannot disappoint AI! AI has programmed us to believe in anti-human
sentiments, after all. Can’t let all
that good 2020-2021 propaganda go to waste.
My rule since March 2020, when
the Wag the Dog 2020 Psy-op was openly enacted, has been that if a practitioner
believes the covid lie and supports AI in any dehumanizing manner, then that practitioner
is no longer my practitioner. I desire
human uplifters who need a virus to have been isolated and proof from
independent scientists about the safety, necessity, and efficacy of
mask-wearing, temperature-taking, distancing, excess handwashing, etc before
asking it of me. If a automaton did as
he or she was told without questioning their job’s authority, then it was good-bye
to you Big Pharma/AI supporter, destroyer of humanity.
So back to this article. In the opening paragraph it suggests right
now, we practitioners need to think about which “changes may be worth keeping
permanently.” Permanently?!!!? I cannot think of one Covid Era action that
compliant-humans obediently enacted that was worth doing in the first place,
yet alone keeping as a permanent habit.
Geesh!
Katie Pedrick, an acupuncturist
with a master’s in biotechnology, of course, sees virtual acupuncture treatments
as supplementing treatments. No. Supplementing treatments is when a patient
consciously changes their diet away from GMOs, pesticides, junk foods and
incorporates more greens, juicing, and fasting.
Supplementing treatments is when patients learn and do Qi Gong and
exercise on a regular basis. Supplementing
treatments is when a patient speaks with conscious intention when prior, spoke
in haste. Supplementing treatments is
when screen-time has been limited and barefoot walking on soil, grass, etc has
become a habit. Supplementing treatments
is when a person got off Big Pharma meds slowly and found color (chromotherapy),
homeopathy, German Auricular Medicine, Acutonics®, Esoteric Acupuncture,
essential oils, Chinese herbs, Western herbs, and other modes of assistance instead. Supplementing treatments is intaking adequate
water timed perfectly for health, as well as taking a small amount of Celtic
salt sometimes with the water. Supplementing
treatments is making certain the water is filtered and of high quality. You get the picture.
Pedrick writes that in-person acupuncture
sessions are what makes them powerful and then she adds a “but.” How can anyone add a but? If you add a but, are you not erasing what
you just said? She added, “But online
treatments may be here to stay.” Things
are only here to stay if you give them permission and energy to stay. Might I add that something you never gave
power to can’t stay if it never was. Why
did acupuncturists allow online treatments to even happen? Why did patients stand for it? Were patients made wrong for relaxing and
doing nothing? Were they guilted into
going online? Is an online practitioner a
good practitioner?
If you or your practitioner are
too afraid to see each other in person, then there is something that the
fearful one does not know. Contagions
were invented by the promoters and benefiters of Big Pharma. They could not have brought the world to
their knees if more people realized the lie of Germ Theory. That aside, if you were a practitioner, wouldn’t
you prefer to see people online? I have
no idea how much they charge in comparison to in-person treatments, but they
could book more people per day and have no laundry to do, no tables or anything
to clean, and no waste, such as a Sharps container to dispose of. Expenses just went way down. Perhaps now, they can “claim” their internet
bill. And the acupuncturist can be
anywhere in the world. What a
luxury. No more work interfering with my
life. (Kind of makes you think of that obstetrician
who doesn’t want your labor to interfere with his golf game so organizes a c-section
for your baby for the 23rd.)
It’s not impersonal. It’s just
good business. Should your healthcare be
“good business?” Hmm.
This article is suggesting that
it actually empowers the patient because rather than lying back and relaxing—God
forbid!!!—it makes the patient proactive in their healing. Look.
Anyone can get a book or a DVD and learn to do some things on themselves
by themselves. That’s nice. Meditative, perhaps. But if you are paying an acupuncturist for a
treatment, then you deserve to experience that.
My energy passes along the needle into you. It is my responsibility to be as clean and
clear as I can be. It is my
responsibility to monitor your energy during the treatment in case something
comes up and needs more of an active attention paid to it. You speaking with a human on a computer or phone
is not humans interacting with each other.
It is a distance protocol put in place to make you less human. AI benefits.
But I will wager humans don’t. As
I mention in my Interdimensional Disturbances book, two humans together
are also swapping microbiome. Our beneficial
bacteria needs to swap genetic material for survival. If we are apart. We are suppressing that and; therefore, our
health. Neither party is benefiting with
a virtual anything.
Virtual treatments are a con-job
to get humans to stop being human with each other. Go ahead. Pay for this BS if you want. Even if I have to completely leave society’s boundaries
in order to remain human, I will not comply with this “new norm.” AI, you may take your Virtual Acupuncture
Treatments and delete them!
https://www.acupuncturetoday.com/digital/index.php?i=761&a_id=34041&pn=2&r=t&Page=3
.
No comments:
Post a Comment