Jones, Jane LL 00# 00# 00# US
#### Street,
City, California
3 April 2022
Dr. Tomás Aragón, CDPH
PO Box 997377
MS 0500
Sacramento, CA 95899
Re:
substantive law and evidence
Dear Dr. Aragón:
Please disaffirm the following facts using substantive
law and evidence:
1.
No physical evidence exists proving that
SARS-COV2 (and all its names ie: coronavirus that is natural, contagious and
harmful; covid-19 that is natural, contagious and harmful) has been isolated
from an expired nor an ill human body, not using PCR—which is not a test and
cannot isolate a virus—nor by a computer-generated guess, nor where the patient
sample was put with any other source of genetic material, for example fetal
calf serum, hepatocytes,
monkey kidney epithelial cells (Cercopithecus aethiops), or the like. To be
clear, “isolation” means the act of separating a thing from everything else and
you have no definitive proof that a natural virus has been isolated that is a
contagion.
2.
To support mask and vaccine mandates in
response to so-called covid goes against 18 US Code Sections 1035(a), (a)(1),
and (a)(2).
You
have thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of this Notice to respond to me in
notarized affidavit form with a man or woman signing the affidavit. Failure to reply within thirty (30) calendar
days to this Notice disaffirming the above statements means you acquiesce to
their validity.
Sincerely
yours,
Jones, Jane
________________
Witness
________________
Witness
Monday, May 9th, I can file this letter to California's health director (and any response he may send to me) with a clerk at a courthouse.
Jones, Jane LL 000 ### 000 US
c/o #### Street,
City, California
3 April 2022
Secretary Xavier Becerra
HHS Headquarters
U. S. Department of
Health & Human Services
200 Independence Avenue,
SW
Washington, DC 20201
Re: substantive
law and evidence
Dear Secretary Becerra:
Please disaffirm the following facts using substantive
law and evidence:
1.
No physical evidence exists proving that
SARS-COV2 (and all its names ie: coronavirus that is natural, contagious and
harmful; covid-19 that is natural, contagious and harmful) has been isolated
from an expired nor an ill human body, not using PCR—which is not a test and
cannot isolate a virus—nor by a computer-generated guess, nor where the patient
sample was put with any other source of genetic material, for example fetal
calf serum, hepatocytes,
monkey kidney epithelial cells (Cercopithecus aethiops), or the like. To be
clear, “isolation” means the act of separating a thing from everything else and
you have no definitive proof that a natural virus has been isolated that is a
contagion.
2.
To support mask and vaccine mandates in
response to so-called covid goes against 18 US Code Sections 1035(a), (a)(1),
and (a)(2).
3.
Each entrance to a public place in the
United States of America requiring masks, proof of vaccination status, or both
had no way for a person to prove the question of jurisdiction, thus caused
discrimination against living men and women.
You
have thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of this Notice to respond to me in
notarized affidavit form with a man or woman signing the affidavit. Failure to reply within thirty (30) calendar
days to this Notice disaffirming the above statements means you acquiesce to
their validity.
Sincerely
yours,
Jones, Jane
______________
Witness
________________
Witness
Jones, Jane LL 00# #00 ### US
c/o #### Street,
City, California
3 April 2022
Dr. Rochelle Walensky
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1600 Clifton Road,
Atlanta, GA 30329
Re: substantive
law and evidence
Dear Dr. Rochelle
Walensky:
Please disaffirm the following facts using substantive
law and evidence:
1.
No physical evidence exists proving that
SARS-COV2 (and all its names ie: coronavirus that is natural, contagious and
harmful; covid-19 that is natural, contagious and harmful) has been isolated
from an expired nor an ill human body, not using PCR—which is not a test and
cannot isolate a virus—nor by a computer-generated guess, nor where the patient
sample was put with any other source of genetic material, for example fetal
calf serum, hepatocytes,
monkey kidney epithelial cells (Cercopithecus aethiops), or the like. To be
clear, “isolation” means the act of separating a thing from everything else and
you have no definitive proof that a natural virus has been isolated that is a
contagion.
2.
To support mask and vaccine mandates in
response to so-called covid goes against 18 US Code Sections 1035(a), (a)(1),
and (a)(2).
3.
Each entrance to a public place in the
United States of America requiring masks, proof of vaccination status, or both
had no way for a person to prove the question of jurisdiction, thus caused
discrimination against living men and women.
You have thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of
this Notice to respond to me in notarized affidavit form with a man or woman
signing the affidavit. Failure to reply
within thirty (30) calendar days to this Notice disaffirming the above
statements means you acquiesce to their validity.
Sincerely
yours,
Jones, Jane
________________
Witness
Jones, Jane LL ### 000 00# US
c/o #### Street,
City, California
3 April 2022
President Biden
The
White House
1600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington,
DC 20500
Re: substantive
law and evidence
Dear Mr. Biden:
Please disaffirm the following facts using substantive
law and evidence:
1.
No physical evidence exists proving that
SARS-COV2 (and all its names ie: coronavirus that is natural, contagious and
harmful; covid-19 that is natural, contagious and harmful) has been isolated
from an expired nor an ill human body, not using PCR—which is not a test and
cannot isolate a virus—nor by a computer-generated guess, nor where the patient
sample was put with any other source of genetic material, for example fetal
calf serum, hepatocytes,
monkey kidney epithelial cells (Cercopithecus aethiops), or the like. To be
clear, “isolation” means the act of separating a thing from everything else and
you have no definitive proof that a natural virus has been isolated that is a
contagion.
2.
To support mask and vaccine mandates in
response to so-called covid goes against 18 US Code Sections 1035(a), (a)(1),
and (a)(2).
3.
Each entrance to a public place in the
United States of America requiring masks, proof of vaccination status, or both
had no way for a person to prove the question of jurisdiction, thus caused discrimination
against living men and women.
You have thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of
this Notice to respond to me in notarized affidavit form with a man or woman
signing the affidavit. Failure to reply
within thirty (30) calendar days to this Notice disaffirming the above
statements means you acquiesce to their validity.
Sincerely
yours,
Jones, Jane
________________
Witness
_________________
Witness
_________________
Witness
These Notices were sent out on 4/4. Three were sent from my door and three from a
local mailbox. The reason is because I
got them bopped with the “round dater,” as this postal worker called it, and he
did not understand my no-pay registered mail, so after they were bopped, I took
them to mail them myself. I could have taken time to educate him but was in a hurry. The letter to Bonta was sent from my door certified on
4/5.
Jones, Jane #### 1111 0000 #### 1111
c/o #### Street
City, California
5 April 2022
Attorney General Bonta
CA Department of Justice
PO Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Re: Papers for my administrative
file
Dear Attorney General Bonta:
Please place copies of
these Presumptive Notices to the LA County Executive
Offices of the Board of
Supervisors and to Dr. Tomás Aragón firmly and securely in
my administrative file. Thank-you.
Bright Day,
Jones, Jane
4/27/22 added
If I do not hear back from these folks, then I can file copies of these Notices with the clerk at a District Court under property. Why property over miscellaneous? Because Rights are property. The Right to Action is property.
