Sunday, April 3, 2022

Presumptive Notices



I have been sending FIOA requests to officials for two years to show me a natural, contagious virus, because they know harm comes from in a lab, is intentionally disseminated, or both.  I started out very unprofessional.  The only consistency is that I sent my requests through the Judicial District as private, living man.

Last week on Radio Ranch, Thomas added information to our discussion that has taken my battle with the opponent to another level.  He introduced us to the Presumptive Notice, which includes substantive law & evidence.  Basically, the author of the Notice writes roughly three claims as facts.  If the recipient of the Notice is silent, then the assumption is that those facts are Truth.  Then, the author goes to the defacto court, the artificial person’s physical building and files this paper there.  (Patrick Divine has helped me a little with convincing a clerk to file any papers under Statutes at Large, Volume 1, Session 1, Chapter 20, Section 32  that basically states that a court has to take our items, any forms that are submitted to them.  Before I get to this step, I will find more recent words on paper that will compel a clerk to accept my papers.  Even if I get a reply, I might still submit them…especially if they write a provable lie.)

To me, it is important to file papers in your administrative file with your state’s attorney general and with Secretary of State Blinken and to file papers in a court.  If a group wants to bully you saying that you are harassing an official with all of your letters and they take you to the defacto court, you can bring these into the proceedings.  I also would submit a challenge to the health departments for an isolate of a natural, contagious virus.  But there are other uses, perhaps….

On April 4, 2022, these five letters will get bopped and sent registered mail through the Judicial District.  The witnesses and myself left our red-inked thumbprints.  



Jones, Jane                                                                            LL ### 000 ### US

c/o #### Street,

City, California

 

 

3 April 2022

 

 

County of Los Angeles,

Executive Offices of the Board of Supervisors

Room 383 Hall of Administration

500 West Temple Street

Los Angeles, California 90012

 

 

Re: substantive law and evidence

 

 

Dear Ms. Zavala and Executive Offices of the Board of Supervisors:

 

Please disaffirm the following facts using substantive law and evidence:

1.    No physical evidence exists proving that SARS-COV2 (and all its names ie: coronavirus that is natural, contagious and harmful; covid-19 that is natural, contagious and harmful) has been isolated from an expired nor an ill human body, not using PCR—which is not a test and cannot isolate a virus—nor by a computer-generated guess, nor where the patient sample was put with any other source of genetic material, for example fetal calf serum, hepatocytes, monkey kidney epithelial cells (Cercopithecus aethiops), or the like. To be clear, “isolation” means the act of separating a thing from everything else and you have no definitive proof that a natural virus has been isolated that is a contagion.

2.    To support mask and vaccine mandates in response to so-called covid goes against 18 US Code Sections 1035(a), (a)(1), and (a)(2).

3.    Each entrance to a public LA County place requiring masks, proof of vaccination status, or both had no way for a person to prove the question of jurisdiction, thus caused discrimination against living men and women.

You have thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of this Notice to respond to me in notarized affidavit form with a man or woman signing the affidavit.  Failure to reply within thirty (30) calendar days to this Notice disaffirming the above statements means you acquiesce to their validity.  

 

Sincerely yours,

 

Jones, Jane

 

 

                                                                                                        _____________

                                                                                                               Witness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                      _________________

                                                                                                                                 Witness



Monday, May 9th, I can file this letter to the Executives (and any response the legal team  may send to me) with a clerk at a courthouse.

This is the Notice related to fraud.  I will be holding officials accountable for the fraud only here. I will not be focusing on trespass. Jurisdiction will likely come into it, though.





                                                                                                           

Jones, Jane                                                                         LL 00# 00# 00# US

#### Street,

City, California

 

 

3 April 2022

 

 

Dr. Tomás Aragón, CDPH

PO Box 997377

MS 0500

Sacramento, CA 95899

 

Re: substantive law and evidence

 

 

Dear Dr. Aragón:

 

Please disaffirm the following facts using substantive law and evidence:

1.    No physical evidence exists proving that SARS-COV2 (and all its names ie: coronavirus that is natural, contagious and harmful; covid-19 that is natural, contagious and harmful) has been isolated from an expired nor an ill human body, not using PCR—which is not a test and cannot isolate a virus—nor by a computer-generated guess, nor where the patient sample was put with any other source of genetic material, for example fetal calf serum, hepatocytes, monkey kidney epithelial cells (Cercopithecus aethiops), or the like. To be clear, “isolation” means the act of separating a thing from everything else and you have no definitive proof that a natural virus has been isolated that is a contagion.

2.    To support mask and vaccine mandates in response to so-called covid goes against 18 US Code Sections 1035(a), (a)(1), and (a)(2).

 

You have thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of this Notice to respond to me in notarized affidavit form with a man or woman signing the affidavit.  Failure to reply within thirty (30) calendar days to this Notice disaffirming the above statements means you acquiesce to their validity. 

 

Sincerely yours,

 

Jones, Jane

 

 

 

                                                                                                 ________________

                                                                                                            Witness

 

                                                                                                                                                                

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

                                                                                                ________________

                                                                                                            Witness

 


Monday, May 9th, I can file this letter to California's health director (and any response he may send to me) with a clerk at a courthouse.



Jones, Jane                                                                                    LL 000 ### 000 US

c/o #### Street,

City, California

 

 

3 April 2022

 

Secretary Xavier Becerra

HHS Headquarters

U. S. Department of Health & Human Services

200 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20201

 

 

Re: substantive law and evidence

 

 

Dear Secretary Becerra:

 

Please disaffirm the following facts using substantive law and evidence:

1.    No physical evidence exists proving that SARS-COV2 (and all its names ie: coronavirus that is natural, contagious and harmful; covid-19 that is natural, contagious and harmful) has been isolated from an expired nor an ill human body, not using PCR—which is not a test and cannot isolate a virus—nor by a computer-generated guess, nor where the patient sample was put with any other source of genetic material, for example fetal calf serum, hepatocytes, monkey kidney epithelial cells (Cercopithecus aethiops), or the like. To be clear, “isolation” means the act of separating a thing from everything else and you have no definitive proof that a natural virus has been isolated that is a contagion.

2.    To support mask and vaccine mandates in response to so-called covid goes against 18 US Code Sections 1035(a), (a)(1), and (a)(2).

3.    Each entrance to a public place in the United States of America requiring masks, proof of vaccination status, or both had no way for a person to prove the question of jurisdiction, thus caused discrimination against living men and women.

You have thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of this Notice to respond to me in notarized affidavit form with a man or woman signing the affidavit.  Failure to reply within thirty (30) calendar days to this Notice disaffirming the above statements means you acquiesce to their validity. 

 

Sincerely yours,

 

Jones, Jane

 

 

 

                                                                                                      ______________

                                                                                                               Witness   

 

 

 

 

                 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

                                                                                                                     ________________                                                                                                         

                                                                                                                                Witness        

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

 

 Jones, Jane                                                                             LL 00# #00 ### US

c/o #### Street,

City, California

 

 

3 April 2022

 

 

Dr. Rochelle Walensky

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road,

Atlanta, GA 30329

 

 

Re: substantive law and evidence

 

 

Dear Dr. Rochelle Walensky:

 

Please disaffirm the following facts using substantive law and evidence:

1.    No physical evidence exists proving that SARS-COV2 (and all its names ie: coronavirus that is natural, contagious and harmful; covid-19 that is natural, contagious and harmful) has been isolated from an expired nor an ill human body, not using PCR—which is not a test and cannot isolate a virus—nor by a computer-generated guess, nor where the patient sample was put with any other source of genetic material, for example fetal calf serum, hepatocytes, monkey kidney epithelial cells (Cercopithecus aethiops), or the like. To be clear, “isolation” means the act of separating a thing from everything else and you have no definitive proof that a natural virus has been isolated that is a contagion.

2.    To support mask and vaccine mandates in response to so-called covid goes against 18 US Code Sections 1035(a), (a)(1), and (a)(2).

3.    Each entrance to a public place in the United States of America requiring masks, proof of vaccination status, or both had no way for a person to prove the question of jurisdiction, thus caused discrimination against living men and women.

You have thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of this Notice to respond to me in notarized affidavit form with a man or woman signing the affidavit.  Failure to reply within thirty (30) calendar days to this Notice disaffirming the above statements means you acquiesce to their validity. 

 

Sincerely yours,

 

Jones, Jane

 

 

                                                                                        ________________

                                                                                                 Witness

 

 

 

 Jones, Jane                                                                             LL ### 000 00# US

c/o #### Street,

City, California

 

 

3 April 2022

 

 

President Biden

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20500

 

 

Re: substantive law and evidence

 

 

Dear Mr. Biden:

 

Please disaffirm the following facts using substantive law and evidence:

1.    No physical evidence exists proving that SARS-COV2 (and all its names ie: coronavirus that is natural, contagious and harmful; covid-19 that is natural, contagious and harmful) has been isolated from an expired nor an ill human body, not using PCR—which is not a test and cannot isolate a virus—nor by a computer-generated guess, nor where the patient sample was put with any other source of genetic material, for example fetal calf serum, hepatocytes, monkey kidney epithelial cells (Cercopithecus aethiops), or the like. To be clear, “isolation” means the act of separating a thing from everything else and you have no definitive proof that a natural virus has been isolated that is a contagion.

2.    To support mask and vaccine mandates in response to so-called covid goes against 18 US Code Sections 1035(a), (a)(1), and (a)(2).

3.    Each entrance to a public place in the United States of America requiring masks, proof of vaccination status, or both had no way for a person to prove the question of jurisdiction, thus caused discrimination against living men and women.

You have thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of this Notice to respond to me in notarized affidavit form with a man or woman signing the affidavit.  Failure to reply within thirty (30) calendar days to this Notice disaffirming the above statements means you acquiesce to their validity. 

 

Sincerely yours,

 

Jones, Jane

 

 

                                                                                        ________________

                                                                                                 Witness

 

 

 

 

 

                                                

 

                                                                                        _________________

                                                                                                 Witness

 

                                                 

 

                                                                                        _________________

                                                                                                  Witness

 

These Notices were sent out on 4/4.  Three were sent from my door and three from a local mailbox.  The reason is because I got them bopped with the “round dater,” as this postal worker called it, and he did not understand my no-pay registered mail, so after they were bopped, I took them to mail them myself.  I could have taken time to educate him but was in a hurry.  The letter to Bonta was sent from my door certified on 4/5.

 

Jones, Jane                                                                                         #### 1111 0000 #### 1111

c/o #### Street

City, California

 

 

5 April 2022

 

 

Attorney General Bonta

CA Department of Justice

PO Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Re: Papers for my administrative file

 

Dear Attorney General Bonta:

Please place copies of these Presumptive Notices to the LA County Executive

Offices of the Board of Supervisors and to Dr. Tomás Aragón firmly and securely in my administrative file.  Thank-you.

 

 

 

Bright Day,

 

 

Jones, Jane

 

 


4/27/22 added
If I do not hear back from these folks, then I can file copies of these Notices with the clerk at a District Court under property.  Why property over miscellaneous?  Because Rights are property.  The Right to Action is property.

No comments:

Post a Comment