Sunday, May 26, 2019

Doctor’s Support to Stop 5G

First of all, to clarify about 5G.  Fourth generation cell towers will go 5G as soon as the-criminal-that-believe-they-be are ready to turn 5G on.  Secondly, there will be smaller posts and places with 5G antennas on them closer to each other than there are towers right now.  If we can stop the cell towers, we can stop 5G.  If you don't know why we should stop a military-grade weapon, then go research and come back later.  This article is to help you when you receive a letter informing you a cell tower is to go up near your home or you are already up to fighting the arrogant planning commissioner of your city.

In order to use getting a restraining order against the parties involved with constructing a cell tower, you need to develop a reasonable fear that this tower is going to harm you.  Go to your medical doctor.  Ask, “Doctor, does electrical-magnetic radiation cause harm?”    If this professional knows the answer is yes, great.  Have a letter drawn up stating so. If the doctor answers, “Depends…”  Take notes on what he or she is saying. The first thing we need is a letter from a doctor informing those concerned that this professional recognizes that electro-magnetic radiation will harm his or her patient, namely…you.

Having a doctor’s note removes the science.  Remember, the courts see science as subjective because the pro-tower side can also bring in experts that can say otherwise.  This is known as subjective.  (Even if it should be known as bribery, because the research revealing the harm of radiation emitting towers truly isn’t an opinion and obviously the pro-tower side is being paid handsomely.)  The letter from the doctor is a medical expert identifying that there is a reasonable belief that the tower will harm.

How to go about getting the letter… 

Make the appointment and say, “I believe” or “I’m concerned a cell tower to be erected near my house is going to harm me.”  Perhaps at this point, the doctor will interrupt affirming your belief is so or denying it.  Either way, perhaps you will see where he or she stands on the subject.  If it is denying harm then ask, “Well, explain to me then why my dentist gives me a lead bib with x-rays?”  But if you don’t want to be confrontational perhaps simply ask, “Can you please look at the science?  I have these links for starters if you’d like.  You can get back to me and please tell me if you think this is safe or not.”  Add research links that you feel are important but keep these two at the top.

If the doctor needs time before giving a letter, ask that if he or she decides to write a letter, to please state that in following the precautionary principle, if there is a risk of harm, the doctor is advising to avoid that risk.

You are concerned that those involved with the tower are threatening to assault you.  Your concern is based on a fear that has been substantiated by a medical doctor.  It is a reasonable fear.  Substantiated evidence is considered to be objective and admissible.

Earlier, I stated that the letters are needed in order to get a restraining order.  Clearly, first, we need our letters so we may put the planning commissioner, cell tower representative, and the owner of the property that will make money for having a cell tower on the premises on notice.  We are warning them all that we see a tower as an unwanted assault.  We are basically setting it up that we all will file a restraining order against them but without coming right out and saying it.

Go get your letters!

Serve the World Through Saving Your City from 5G

Hello 5G-Free Team,

I am making a plan for both a hearing with the planning commissioner of your city and for a court if needed later.  Here are some points that will assist your city in not going 5G, so please do the things you can and ask neighbors and family members to consider these points, as well.

·         Get a landline

·         Use cash

·         Use a computer more and old-style cameras instead of your cell phone

·         Get rid of microwave

·         Get rid of Smart meter and smart appliances and research if cable over wi-fi has less EMF's.

We need to be able to say, “Yes” or “No” to certain questions that may be asked during the land commissioner’s hearing or even a court hearing to come.  The following is an explanation of the points in detail:

They may ask, “Do you have a land line?” to prove that you’re full of it and are crying about cell phones when they obviously already work in your home.  You are already allowing yourself to be harmed when in your home, so what’s a little more radiation?  We want to be able to say, “Yes!” and surprise the room.  Also, the more residents world-wide who have a land line, the more the-criminals-that-believe-they-be lose power over the masses to enslave them with the smart prison they are trying to establish.  If governments of the world can get the masses on a credit system, they can lock individuals out of using cell phones, having communication accessibility.  For that to work, first we need to be reliant on the cell phone.  We have to embrace all former ways of communication such as writing letters and using land lines.

“Do you use your phone for banking and financial transactions?” You want to be able to say, “No,” because you use your computer perhaps, but are involved with physical cash and knowing your teller at the local bank.  This will ensure humans will perhaps have a job tomorrow, but also makes it harder for governments to take cash from us.  They made banking convenient in order to enslave you in a smart system.  Doesn’t that make you mad?  The more cash that is used, the harder it is for you to be profiled.  Also, the more cash that is used, the less electronic currency is used, the harder it is to get us imprisoned with the credit system.  They want full control of your finances.  If they decide you are bad, they can decrease your worth and lock you out of travel, shopping, etc.  If we don’t go along quietly towards not having physical money, their credit system cannot succeed.  (Yes, I realize cash/money is not as good as the bartering or just freely giving style of long ago, but at least cash helps us to have some power.)

“How much time do you spend on your phone?”  Remember, they may be in a place to subpoena our records of usage to prove that we allow EMF’s into our lives willingly.  Wouldn’t it be astounding if the numbers of usage were low?  I for one would love to see their astonished faces.  I know it’s convenient to watch YouTube or search for information on a cell phone.  That’s why that was given to us: to get us hooked. By getting that weapon that they want to use against us out of our hands, we are taking a step at severing the cord that binds us to an enslaved future.  Likewise, leaving the phone at home or in an office or in a car instead of having it with us everywhere we go is taking back power.  They want to track you.  They want you in fear if you don’t have a cell phone with you.  When I mentioned leaving the cell phone at home, did you feel fear?  “But what if…?”  Remember, not too long ago, we traveled the world, interstate, to work and home without it.  How dare they get us thinking we need it.  Purchase a disposable camera.  Get away from your phone where you can.  Baby steps.

“Do you have a microwave oven in your home?”  If we can say no, we are proving that we don’t freely allow radiation into our homes.  “It is joined to the oven in the home I rent but it is unplugged and never used.”  “Nope.”  Those are two great answers.  There is research out there related to the harm the microwave does to your food, as well as to you in just having it plugged in.  I haven’t needed a microwave.  Not through being a full-time student, employee, mother and wife did I need it.  (The TV would be another emitter of radiation that at least could be unplugged when not in use if the home has one.  They might ask about this emitter to see your willingness to be exposed and use it against you.)

Getting rid of the smart meter is another battle.  Perhaps you can at least state it’s out of your control. had some suggestion of help awhile ago.  I don’t see why you can’t use the same approach that I am taking with the towers and 5G which we’ll briefly touch on shortly.  At the very worst, in the future if you have smart windows and doors, you may be locked in your house.  If you have a smart fridge, not only may you be locked out of it, but you may have too few credits to have it be cold, or some other aspect of control may be used against you.  By the way, the smart appliances hear you and assist spying and profiling.

For the hearing itself…and subsequent court hearings:

Plan on serving notice to the planning commission that you have a doctor’s note stating that the tower will be bad for your health (more in a subsequent blog about detail of this letter so you can get one too.)  Further, state that according to the California Code of Civil Procedure (527.6), Section b (2) “credible threat of violence,” (check code of your state) you will file a restraining order against (name) and those involved with the planning commissioner office, (name at the business that is wanting payment for a cell tower on the premises), and (name cell company) if they go ahead with placing you in fear for your life over assaulting you with EMF radiation by erecting that tower when you have already informed them about your doctor’s note and stance.

Soon I will get ideas for you regarding a strong letter from an MD.  This is called “objective” proof and is powerful.  “Subjective” proof is all they are used to know, research from scientists.  For US citizens, we have to defeat Section 704 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act.

Here’s to hoping we can serve the world through saving our cities from 5G.

Bright Day Thoughts,

Paget Anne of Essendon

Saturday, May 18, 2019

Rebuttal to The Union’s, Vaccine Safety: The state of Vaccinations

A friend sent this article by way of, “See?  You are wrong to think vaccines aren’t safe.”  So, let me walk you through this propaganda.

This article is so full of misinformation and missing information, that I almost don’t even want to bother doing this much.  To start with, many of us who see vaccines for what they are figure there is a sinister reason Pan’s handler wants SB 276 passed.  The picture is of the educated trying to demonstrate how his reasoning for the medical exemption is fraudulent.  There truly is no problem.  When SB 277 was designed, one of the key players wanted the medical exemption left in place and now Pan is going back on his word.  He knew the future.  He knew the plan.  Let me tell you what it is.  They want SB 276 to pass so when they come for the adults within two years, you will have to get vaccines before you may renew your driver’s license in California unless you have a medical exemption…which they hope you won’t be able to get.  (Time to become living men, people! Get liberated from the system.)

Jenner was incompetent.  Go ahead.  Look into him and how his vaccine killed his child along with others.

So much to say about Wakefield, as well, so I will leave you with a link for starters.  Know this, a Big Pharma employee, such as doctors and trolls, always say this about Wakefield in their posts, articles, and when in their office.  They learn a line and it’s sheer nonsense.  Though I see him as pro-vax, he seemed decent when I met him in 2002.  He rightly linked the gut to autism.

Those who support vaccines always give credit for an infection’s decline to a vaccine.  Better nutrition, better waste removal and overall cleaner environments, higher percentage of populations with natural immunity, and less stress…for example being able to go out an enjoy the arts over full-time survival mode…all contributed to the decline of people succumbing to infections.  When your gut is strong and you have the right tools at your hands…not Western Medicine, which undermines health…your body can push back and do fine against a pathogen.  Sime infections have a natural rhythm of surfacing and then seemingly going dormant.

As far as I remember, the measles vaccine was available in 1962.  Not widely, but it was around.  How many in their statistic were vaccinated?  Atypical Measles is dangerous.  At least 33% of any outbreak of measles includes vaccinated.  Sometimes more as in the at least 38% of the Disneyland fiasco.

As for the quantity of vaccines being injected into children, there is not one single vaccine schedule that has been tested for safety.  They don’t know how all these vaccines interact with each other in a bloodstream, because no study against a saline-placebo group has ever been done.  No group has ever been followed for one year, five, ten after a decent study.  (How can they prove vaccine schedules safe when an individual vaccine hasn’t been deemed safe?  There’s a reason these tests haven’t been done.)

This is how they vote vaccines in

To what DeBusk said about testing the vaccine against a group that didn’t receive the vaccine…And do you realize the other group did not receive an inert saline placebo?  They received harmful adjuvants or the older version of the vaccine they are “testing,” which isn’t rigorous….
As for unethical to expose to a disease and give them a placebo, we have a whole group who has never been vaccinated that they could use by looking at their medical records as a separate test, but I’m sorry.  If you want to say something has been rigorously tested, you have to have a group who has not received a vaccine.  You are also testing safety along with efficacy.

They do finally admit that some vaccines shed, but hospitals know it is not rare for they warn recently vaccinated to stay away from their most compromised patients.

If vaccines were set against a true saline placebo, everyone would see the gut and neurological damage that vaccines cause.  That’s why they won’t do it.

Of course doctors want children vaccinated.  They get financial rewards when a certain percentage of their clientele have shots and tests.  Further, they know vaccine injuries are big business for them.  Until the client dies, they have a customer for life.  The conflict of interest makes them a group you cannot trust.

This is another element of a Big Pharma employee.  They don’t know…or simply lie blatantly…about what herd immunity is.  Herd immunity comes from the percentage of the population that has experienced the infection in question.  Now they cannot succumb again. It has nothing to do with vaccine rates.  How can it?  The MMR, for instance, only supposedly protects, though I would argue that point…against one genotype of measles.  That is hardly protection when someone who has experienced wild measles has protection against the gamut (24 genotypes).

The NVIC is your tax dollars.  It may seem like the government is paying for the slaughter of your children, but it’s those who purchase vaccines.

Man, the author made it sound so easy to claim your kid was injured by the vaccine.  It’s a difficult process.  Only a few actually win a settlement.

In 1986, it was well-known to those who wished to sue vaccine makers that they had legislation protecting them.  You can only sue if it’s something like a vial that had expired and was shipped out anyway.  That’s why lawsuits dropped dramatically.  It took two years to implement some kind of compensation because vaccine injury was so prevalent, they had to do something.  Also, the article fails to address that the vaccine makers threatened to stop making vaccines because they were losing too much in lawsuits.  That’s why Reagan gave them a free pass.

The bottom line is that if pharmaceutical companies were liable, they would test them for safety, which would mean that they would have to be made completely differently.  (You culture something on animal parts, viruses of unknow varieties will enter your product.  They will lead to problems in some hosts.  13.1 of the inserts attests to them knowingly not being safe.  They make it sound like they just haven’t gotten around to testing them.)  Kennedy’s family don’t know about this issue.
Dr. Alexander Langmuir, the father of infectious disease epidemiology at the CDC was not owned by Big Pharma. Research him.

I have the hard copy of this very long article.  It’s very good.

Important to the conversation of power behind harmful products.  (Also, know that glyphosate is in the animals used to culture your vaccines and has infiltrated the product itself.) A vaccine cannot be called GMO-free.)

Just so you know what’s going on.


I'm not convinced those two deaths were because of measles. One was a lady in 2015 who was diagnosed with measles post-mortem. They looked at her blood after she was dead and decided that even though she had been in hospital for pneumonia, she had measles. So, I think that was a lot of BS. The child who died in 2003, was on immune suppressants and it really seems to me that the doctor didn't want to hurt his reputation about what he was doing so they just said that that child had measles. Also diagnosed after death. If these two people had had measles it should have been on their charts when they were admitted into hospital. Or it should have been added to the charts before they died.


To give you an idea about doctors and Big Pharma



And propaganda now compared to 1988, when we did not fear measles.




Vaccines and Autism


Vaccines caused autism here in this federal court case

And here page 2

And here -

Here are 83 cases reviewed by lawyers

Oh look here's a dead kid compensated

If you ever need a lawyer

Here are 127 separate studies linking vaccines and autism.

Read this about Hannah Brusewitz case and how she was harmed by DTP

Supreme Court Unavoidably Unsafe

A dose-response relationship between organic mercury exposure from thimerosal-containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders.

Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990-2010.

Is infant immunization a risk factor for childhood asthma or allergy?

Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?

Infection, vaccines and other environmental triggers of autoimmunity.

DTP with or after measles vaccination is associated with increased in-hospital mortality in Guinea-Bissau.

Measles outbreak in a vaccinated school population: epidemiology, chains of transmission and the role of vaccine failures.

A positive association found between autism prevalence and childhood vaccination uptake across the U.S. population.

Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997-2002.

Abnormal measles-mumps-rubella antibodies and CNS autoimmunity in children with autism.

The plausibility of a role for mercury in the etiology of autism: a cellular perspective

Detection of RNA of Mumps Virus during an Outbreak in a Population with a High Level of Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccine Coverage

A case series of children with apparent mercury toxic encephalopathies manifesting with clinical symptoms of regressive autistic disorders.

Aluminum in the central nervous system (CNS): toxicity in humans and animals, vaccine adjuvants, and autoimmunity.

Unvaccinated Children are Healthier

Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity

Combination MMRV vaccine linked with 2-fold risk of seizures

Impact of environmental factors on the prevalence of autistic disorder after 1979

Increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infections associated with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine.

Effectiveness of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in influenza-related hospitalization in children: a case-control study.

Speciation of methyl- and ethyl-mercury in hair of breastfed infants acutely exposed to thimerosal-containing vaccines.

Comparison of VAERS fetal-loss reports during three consecutive influenza seasons


FDA concludes vaccines cause Autism

..."the present study provides new epidemiological evidence supporting an association between increasing organic-Hg exposure from Thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines and the subsequent risk of an ASD diagnosis"...

.A two-phase study evaluating the relationship between…

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is defined by…


US health?

MMR Safe?

Nurse speaks out


Dr. Suzanne Humphries

Friday, May 17, 2019

On Vaccine Manufacturers Not Being Liable

The following was written in response to a pharmaceutical-paid troll’s comments.  Since W*eth was so much on this troll’s mind, this troll must be employed by W*eth. Educated parents do not support vaccine companies.  Only paid trolls do.

If a vaccine-making company sends out a vial that is expired and it is used, the company can be held liable.  But check out this language:
“…design defects were not mentioned because they are not a basis for liability.”  This is exactly what we, people who say that pharmaceutical companies cannot be held liable, mean.  The glass, contaminants, and metals that are in a vaccine without any benefit to the patient that in fact should not be there will not be a reason to hold them responsible.

Further the link below says, “Taxing their product to fund the compensation program, while leaving their liability for design defect virtually unaltered, would hardly coax them back into the market.”  We know that “The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA or Act) created a no-fault compensation program to stabilize a vaccine market adversely affected by an increase in vaccine-related tort litigation and to facilitate compensation to claimants who found pursuing legitimate vaccine-inflicted injuries too costly and difficult.”

We know that vaccines are taxed so you are actually paying into the fund for injuries if you support the vaccine business.  Your case will be heard by the Court of Federal Claims, naming the Health and Human Services Secretary as the respondent.  What you may not know is that this position, which is on your side in any other situation, is against you in this situation.

“As a quid pro quo,” meaning something for something else, “manufacturers enjoy significant tort-liability protections,” which means protection even though they committed a wrongful act leading to civil legal liability.  “Most importantly, the Act eliminates manufacturer liability for a vaccine’s unavoidable, adverse side effects.”

This document discusses Hannah’s famous case where the DTP killed her and the family got about $200,000, if I remember correctly.  This document says, “Wyeth removed the suit to the Federal District Court. It granted Wyeth summary judgment,” which means a judgment was entered by a court for Wyeth over the grieving mother without a full trial, “holding that the relevant Pennsylvania law was preempted,” which means stopped from being noticed, used, considered, acknowledged, “by 42 U. S. C. §300aa–22(b)(1)…” Basically, if your kid is maimed or murdered by vaccines, you get doubly screwed because you paid the tax but they make it hard for you to win a case where they won’t acknowledge the evidence, because the company is more powerful that you and they probably knew it would harm anyway.  “…which provides that ‘[n]o vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side-effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.’” You should be able to easily sue a manufacturer for a bad reaction to a pharmaceutical period!

“The NCVIA,” National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, “preempts,” take action in order to prevent from happening, “all design-defect claims against vaccine manufacturers brought by plaintiffs seeking compensation for injury or death caused by a vaccine’s side effects. Pp. 7–19. (a) Section 300aa–22(b)(1).”  This is legislation that wants to stop compensation from happening but doesn’t care about stopping injuries and deaths.  It wants to stop the heartbroken parents in their tracks.
“The language of the provision thus suggests the design is not subject to question in a tort action.”  In an infringement of a right leading to a civil liability.  The design most certainly should be up for question.

“Though products-liability law establishes three grounds for liability—defective manufacture, inadequate directions or warnings, and defective design—the Act mentions only manufacture and warnings. It thus seems that the Act’s failure to mention design-defect liability is ‘by deliberate choice, not inadvertence.’ Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co., 537 U. S. 149, 168. Pp. 7–8.
Hmm.  Well, that certainly includes more than simply offering an expired product. Since I am familiar with “drive” involving working rather than travelling, “design” needs to be investigated.  Are they admitting the designed biowarfare so if it kills it’s what they wanted.  Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Ed. Has “scheme” and “contrive” for design.  Interesting that designedly is “‘Wilfully,’ ‘Knowingly,’ ‘Unlawfully,’ and ‘Felloniously’” (p.233).  Well, it’s still interesting that they cannot be held liable for the manufacture of the product.  Unclean workers, products, and room can all fit into the manufacture part of which they are not liable.  But as for being able to use a vaccine that doesn’t have the harmful element, there are so many harmful elements in vaccines, a combination of harmful elements could have caused the injury or death with any vaccine….by design.

In Black’s Law it defines unavoidable as inevitable” (p. 792).  “Moreover, reading the phrase ‘side effects that were unavoidable’ to exempt injuries caused by flawed design would require treating ‘even though’ as a coordinating conjunction linking independent ideas when it is a concessive, subordinating conjunction conveying that one clause weakens or qualifies the other.”  Who cares about semantics?  Inevitable side effects means just that!

“Design defects do not merit a single mention in the Act or in Food and Drug Administration regulations that pervasively regulate the drug manufacturing process. This lack of guidance for design defects, combined with the extensive guidance for the two liability grounds specifically mentioned in the Act, strongly suggests that design defects were not mentioned because they are not a basis for liability. The Act’s mandates lead to the same conclusion.” Well, that’s just ridiculous, but right there it’s saying the drug companies are not liable for a design defect, so there.  That supports the truth that you can’t sue drug companies for vaccines that maim and kill unless they give you an expired vaccine.

“It [the NCVIA] provides for federal agency improvement of vaccine design and for federally prescribed compensation, which are other means for achieving the two beneficial effects of design-defect torts—prompting the development of improved designs, and providing compensation for inflicted injuries.”  Not really.  The tax is all the compensation and federal agencies have not looked into improving vaccine design.

The troll claims those educated and choosing to not vaccinate do not read the safety test…that actually don’t exist.

The CDC paper the troll provided stated:

● Currently, the United States has the safest, most effective vaccine supply in its history

Um.  Excuse me.  There is no proof that vaccines are safe.  They are cultured on animal parts.  Animals have a plethora of viruses that come into the vaccine product.  You can get exposure to many awful pathogens by vaccines.  Glass has been found in them. You want to find weirdness?  Go read about what has been found in these so-called safe vaccines.

They are tested extensively by their paid robots who can’t speak against the company.  People who have signed a hush clause.  Vaccines are sometimes effective at giving the infection they are intended to prevent, but that’s about it.  What studies?  Where are the double-blind studies against a saline-placebo-receiving group who has never been vaccinated?  Where’s the data one year later?  Five years later?  Ten years later?  In fact, where are the comparisons of vaccine-free adults’ health records against vaccine receivers’ health records?  Nothing.  No proof.

More doctors right now know about VAERS compared to any other time, but not many use it.  They also are not trained in detecting vaccine injuries.  Immunization is an incorrect word for vaccine.  To experience the infection is to be immunized against it.