The following was written in response to a pharmaceutical-paid
troll’s comments. Since W*eth was so
much on this troll’s mind, this troll must be employed by W*eth. Educated parents
do not support vaccine companies. Only paid
trolls do.
If a vaccine-making company sends out a vial that is
expired and it is used, the company can be held liable. But check out this language:
“…design
defects were not mentioned because they are not a basis for liability.” This is exactly what we, people who say that pharmaceutical
companies cannot be held liable, mean.
The glass, contaminants, and metals that are in a vaccine without any
benefit to the patient that in fact should not be there will not be a reason to
hold them responsible.
Further the link below says, “Taxing their product to
fund the compensation program, while leaving their liability for design defect
virtually unaltered, would hardly coax them back into the market.” We know that “The National Childhood
Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA or Act) created a no-fault compensation
program to stabilize a vaccine market adversely affected by an increase in
vaccine-related tort litigation and to facilitate compensation to claimants who
found pursuing legitimate vaccine-inflicted injuries too costly and difficult.”
We know that vaccines are taxed so you are actually
paying into the fund for injuries if you support the vaccine business. Your case will be heard by the Court of
Federal Claims, naming the Health and Human Services Secretary as the
respondent. What you may not know is
that this position, which is on your side in any other situation, is against
you in this situation.
“As a quid pro quo,” meaning something for something
else, “manufacturers enjoy significant tort-liability protections,” which means
protection even though they committed a wrongful act leading to civil legal
liability. “Most importantly, the Act
eliminates manufacturer liability for a vaccine’s unavoidable, adverse side
effects.”
This document discusses Hannah’s famous case where the
DTP killed her and the family got about $200,000, if I remember correctly. This document says, “Wyeth removed the suit
to the Federal District Court. It granted Wyeth summary judgment,” which means
a judgment was entered by a court for Wyeth over the grieving mother without a
full trial, “holding that the relevant Pennsylvania law was preempted,” which
means stopped from being noticed, used, considered, acknowledged, “by 42 U. S.
C. §300aa–22(b)(1)…” Basically, if your kid is maimed or murdered by vaccines,
you get doubly screwed because you paid the tax but they make it hard for you
to win a case where they won’t acknowledge the evidence, because the company is
more powerful that you and they probably knew it would harm anyway. “…which provides that ‘[n]o vaccine
manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a
vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine
after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side-effects that
were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was
accompanied by proper directions and warnings.’” You should be able to easily
sue a manufacturer for a bad reaction to a pharmaceutical period!
“The NCVIA,” National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, “preempts,”
take action in order to prevent from happening, “all design-defect claims
against vaccine manufacturers brought by plaintiffs seeking compensation for
injury or death caused by a vaccine’s side effects. Pp. 7–19. (a) Section
300aa–22(b)(1).” This is legislation
that wants to stop compensation from happening but doesn’t care about stopping
injuries and deaths. It wants to stop
the heartbroken parents in their tracks.
“The language of the provision thus suggests the
design is not subject to question in a tort action.” In an infringement of a right leading to a civil
liability. The design most certainly
should be up for question.
“Though products-liability law establishes three
grounds for liability—defective manufacture, inadequate directions or warnings,
and defective design—the Act mentions only manufacture and warnings. It thus
seems that the Act’s failure to mention design-defect liability is ‘by
deliberate choice, not inadvertence.’ Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co., 537 U. S.
149, 168. Pp. 7–8.
Hmm. Well, that
certainly includes more than simply offering an expired product. Since I am
familiar with “drive” involving working rather than travelling, “design” needs
to be investigated. Are they admitting
the designed biowarfare so if it kills it’s what they wanted. Black’s
Law Dictionary 5th Ed. Has “scheme” and “contrive” for design. Interesting that designedly is “‘Wilfully,’ ‘Knowingly,’
‘Unlawfully,’ and ‘Felloniously’” (p.233).
Well, it’s still interesting that they cannot be held liable for the
manufacture of the product. Unclean
workers, products, and room can all fit into the manufacture part of which they
are not liable. But as for being able to
use a vaccine that doesn’t have the harmful element, there are so many harmful
elements in vaccines, a combination of harmful elements could have caused the
injury or death with any vaccine….by design.
In Black’s Law
it defines unavoidable as inevitable” (p. 792).
“Moreover, reading the phrase ‘side effects that were unavoidable’ to
exempt injuries caused by flawed design would require treating ‘even though’ as
a coordinating conjunction linking independent ideas when it is a concessive,
subordinating conjunction conveying that one clause weakens or qualifies the
other.” Who cares about semantics? Inevitable side effects means just that!
“Design defects do not merit a single mention in the
Act or in Food and Drug Administration regulations that pervasively regulate
the drug manufacturing process. This lack of guidance for design defects,
combined with the extensive guidance for the two liability grounds specifically
mentioned in the Act, strongly suggests that design defects were not mentioned
because they are not a basis for liability. The Act’s mandates lead to the same
conclusion.” Well, that’s just ridiculous, but right there it’s saying the drug
companies are not liable for a design defect, so there. That supports the truth that you can’t sue drug
companies for vaccines that maim and kill unless they give you an expired
vaccine.
“It [the NCVIA] provides for federal agency
improvement of vaccine design and for federally prescribed compensation, which
are other means for achieving the two beneficial effects of design-defect
torts—prompting the development of improved designs, and providing compensation
for inflicted injuries.” Not
really. The tax is all the compensation
and federal agencies have not looked into improving vaccine design.
The troll claims those educated and choosing to not
vaccinate do not read the safety test…that actually don’t exist.
The CDC paper the troll provided stated:
● Currently, the United States has the safest, most
effective vaccine supply in its history
Um. Excuse
me. There is no proof that vaccines are
safe. They are cultured on animal
parts. Animals have a plethora of viruses
that come into the vaccine product. You
can get exposure to many awful pathogens by vaccines. Glass has been found in them. You want to
find weirdness? Go read about what has
been found in these so-called safe vaccines.
They are tested extensively by their paid robots who
can’t speak against the company. People who
have signed a hush clause. Vaccines are
sometimes effective at giving the infection they are intended to prevent, but
that’s about it. What studies? Where are the double-blind studies against a
saline-placebo-receiving group who has never been vaccinated? Where’s the data one year later? Five years later? Ten years later? In fact, where are the comparisons of
vaccine-free adults’ health records against vaccine receivers’ health
records? Nothing. No proof.
More doctors right now know about VAERS compared to
any other time, but not many use it.
They also are not trained in detecting vaccine injuries. Immunization is an incorrect word for vaccine. To experience the infection is to be
immunized against it.
No comments:
Post a Comment