Friday, April 9, 2021

Another Letter of Opting Out of Terror

 My immediate boss told me to be at my job site following all C*VID-19 protocol or get a medical reason to not attend work.  I opted for no paid leave of absence since I am healthy and it is a religious reason I cannot follow Satanic protocols.

Now, I am writing to the head of the whole operation.

Dear Mr. .....:

As this C@VID-19 experiment on humanity moves onto(job site), I am writing to inform you that I am opting out of all experiments associated with it and would like to not be discriminated against for opting out, especially since a health officer has no right to take possession of my body.1   Hello.  I am Paget, a sign language interpreter for (job site) with a PhD in a branch of theology.  I currently work at (specific site/department) where I was informed that I have to follow COV*D-19 protocol in order to enter (site).  I opt out of this experiment mainly for religious reasons, so I cannot do this.   Further, I would like to receive regular pay through to the end of (time period) when I will retire.  For these last few months, I can enter (site) while opting out of all experimental C*VID-19 protocols (requirements), stay on Zoom from my home with (group), or other recommendations we could brainstorm.  Please work with me to decide what is best for the experiment itself (Microsoft and company) alongside the staffs’ psyches, because they do not know this is an experiment.

I understand I am most likely catching you off guard.  Unlike most, I have been a student of Antoine Béchamp, Aajonus Vonderplanitz, and Leonard Horwitz, to name a few.  I have also researched engineered viruses and government activities associated with pharmaceutical companies (and their scripts2) for decades and quite naturally see the experiment for what it is.  I am familiar with what are called exosomes, Dual Use Research, and Gain of Function.  Please, bear with me as I describe my stance in detail, for I need you to fully understand that I am consciously opting out of this experiment, but wish to work through to the end of the (time period).

I am opting out of daily temperature checks, mask-wearing, physically distancing myself from humans, excessive hand washing or sanitizing, the weekly “c*vid tests,” and the dawning of the social credit system: the QR Code.  These are all experiments promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services which is supported by the Center for Disease Control (CDC), which is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. They have no institutional review board authorization, which means they are in violation of legislation.  (For this reason, unbeknownst to the public, people can opt out of being quarantined, as well.)  But most of all for me, covert human experimentation is against Natural Law.

Here is some information on how this is an experiment.  The private for-profit corporation known as the CDC sought, filed, and received a patent on April 25, 2003 which made the identification, the detection, and detection kits for coronavirus not available to the general population. By filing that patent, they made it impossible for the public health interests to be served. In 2007, they extended their patent filing to actually patent the virus, which is against 35 US Code section 101. The reason I mention this is that testing could have been going on with so-called sick people for years.  Testing healthy people now is inappropriate, especially in light of this information.

In 2013-2018 they worked to use international sources to take the research on Gain of Function offshore, because it had been determined (by the National Institute of Health in 2013) to be unethical. They decided to work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology so they could get around the ethical and legal implications of the work being done here in the US.  They did that willfully so that in September 2019 in the publication World at Risk from the World Health Organization, Dr. Anthony Fauci and the members of the committee actually affiliated with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, making a recommendation that a respiratory based pathogen simulation must be run.  With no institutional review board review, with no independent physician certifying that their actions were legal, they avoided the exclusions of Section 50.24 of the 21 Code of Regulations.  Meaning, in this instance, they cannot experiment on us, because there has been no institutional review board. There is no independent doctor.4  This so-called pandemic is the simulation Fauci recommended! 

I opt out of the experiment of having my body zapped by a thermometer daily.  Time will tell what daily micro-doses of radiation will do to pineal glands, but I prefer mine as it is.  Yes, I could use a digital thermometer, but I also do not approve of the invasion of privacy related to temperature-taking, nor to regular folks practicing medicine without a license through diagnosing me through that temperature.  If I was the person reading the thermometer, I would know the cycles of the females because I know how high progesterone and high estrogen look on a thermometer.  You would not have known that I have that ability and knowledge to diagnose through temperature had I not told you.  We can only wonder what other temperature readers know that will be an invasion of privacy for the person having their temperature read.  Alongside this, if I have an infection on my leg that is being treated, I may still show a temperature of 100.1.  For me to be sent home with the differential diagnosis of “sick and infectious” is someone practicing medicine without a license against CA penal code § 2052.  In the case of an infection currently being treated, this may be a normal temperature.  I am uncomfortable having my temperature taken daily for all of these points.

Testing healthy humans and weekly at that has never been done before.  Testing healthy people for a problem is like giving healthy people the pertussis swab down the throat on a weekly basis.  I opt out of this mistreatment, this experiment on the heathy!  Further, the swabs used in both the PCR and rapid antigen tests are sterilized using ethylene oxide, which was classified as a carcinogen, a cancer-causing agent in 2016.5  Even the maker of the PCR said it must not be used as a test.  Commercial scientists are not searching for a “covid,” they are identifying pieces of DNA and RNA that have occurred within the life of that body and cannot say definitively what it means.  Depending on how many cycles it is spun, results will vary.  I would NEVER allow a swab to be placed in my nose, but I do not wish to spit into a vial weekly when I know it proves nothing.  Speaking of the swab, they place the same one up both nostrils, potentially exposing the other side to what the first side may be experiencing, bacterial for example. 

Wearing a mask goes against my religious beliefs.  Muslim women wear it, and I am not Muslim.6 It is also a Satanic initiation ritual.  Further, slaves are made to wear them.  Natural Law does not request me to hide my face nor deny myself breath of life.  Man is demanding that I be subservient to him over Natural Law.  Further, I am a researcher and have found no proof of the safety in this.  Dr. Scott Atlas recently said that there is no evidence that a mask mandate stropped the spread of cov*d. Dr. Sunetra Gupta also said that it is difficult to see logically how it would work.7  Oxygen is a vitally important component to my daily healthcare, and I am not willing to sacrifice it for an experiment where healthy humans wear masks for extended lengths of time.

Humans thrive through microbiome swapping which occurs daily through our interactions with each other.  It is homicide to our microflora to be isolated from one another.  By 1992, authors such as Martin Teitel were sounding the alarm that biological diversity was stopping at an alarming rate.  Humans were once enjoying huge varieties of apples, for instance, and since 1900, we have lost 86% (6,ooo varieties) and 30,000 strands of Indian rice were only 10 in the 1990’s.  In the past, our systems and gut flora were primed with each meal we took.  The human is now negatively affected the same as our plants and animals: our flora is lacking genetic diversity this last year.  Genetic uniformity ensures species decline.  In 2020, too many humans were locked up for one year and their microbiome has suffered greatly through lack of genetic diversity through lack of microbiome swapping.  This experiment of humans avoiding each other worldwide has never occurred before; though, those educated in genetic diversity already know what the outcome is to be through beneficial bacteria’s lack of mingling.8

Excessively washing or sanitizing the hands may lead to detrimental decline of the supportive microorganisms that protect the skin and therefore the body, as well as cause cracks and dry skin.  Because of this, I also consciously avoid products such as hand sanitizer as part of my health regime.  The C8VID-19 experiment includes healthy individuals excessively cleaning, and I opt out of this.

Many know I do not bring my cell phone with me when I leave the house due to taking a stand against the social credit system, which is dawning on humanity now with this QR Code.  Being tracked by AI is against my religion as I answer to a different higher power.  QR Code compliance is an experiment around bringing humanity onto the social credit system, and I opt out of this.

Please understand that when I heard about all this experimentation to come to my job site, I elected to retire in June and go quietly into the night.  But then I was ordered back on site mid-April.  Now, I feel I have to say something.  I can see the few options I stated at the beginning and am open to further suggestions. I know this has been a lengthy letter, but the time has come for me to speak.  If you have any further questions, please let me know.  Will it be best for me to enter my (site) without being held to any of the experiment protocols or do you wish for me to work from Zoom?  Is there another option we may explore?  Being that this C&VID-19 is a provable experiment in and of itself, I do not think it fair to ask me to retire before June nor to take an unpaid leave of absence.  If I have failed to prove this is an experiment, then please show me past experiments that proved weekly testing, temperature taking, mask-wearing, physically distancing humans from each other has been played out with healthy individuals before, proving safety, necessity, and effectiveness, because I have found none.

I love that (you do this and that).  And support to those experiencing (this and that).  That is awesome. Thank-you for what you do for us.  Now, I am asking for your support so that I may continuing assisting my (team) until the end of the (timeframe).  Thank-you.


Bright Day Thoughts,


Paget Hillebrand, PhD



2Pandemic terms such as asynchronistic learning, tele-education, and tele-medicine were mentioned in a NASA paper published from 2001-2007, which proves this experience was planned.


Please notice names such as John Hopkins that are affiliated with every part of this experiment, making it a conflict of interest.


Notice Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, WHO, and more that we have seen all through this experiment.


If you watch the full Event 201, you will see familiar faces and hear terms such as “The new norm.”


CA ESA Section 8558b states that a state of emergency can only be called if the threat overwhelms the current resources of the state.  “There is no threat of an epidemic that overwhelms the resources of the state, and therefore, according to the Emergency Services Act, section 8558b, there are no grounds for a State of the Emergency,” says Peggy Hall.




4 CFR Section 50.20–No investigator may involve a human being as a subject in research covered by these regulations unless the investigator has obtained the legally effective informed consent of the subject or the subject’s legally authorized representative.

April 25, 2003, the CDC sought to patent the “Coronavirus Isolated from Humans” in violation of 35 U.S.C. §101 which prohibits patenting nature.

In addition to their attempt to patent the coronavirus associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), they received patent rights to the detection and the manufacturing of a kit to measure fragments of the virus and their awarded claims were granted on August 17, 2010 in U.S. Patent 7,776,521 (the “Patent”).

CDC, NIAID and their Conspiring Associates variously conducted descriptive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and Gain of Function (engineered virus made to be more pathogenic and contagious) research on coronavirus and such research would have required the use or infringement of the Patent at U.S. taxpayer expense in various grants including, but not limited to, U19 AI109761; R01 AI 108197; R01 AI132178; P30 DK065988; U19 AI109680, and other grants.

In September of 2019, Dr. Anthony Fauci of the NIAID and Dr. Chris Elias, President, Global Development Program for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, USA in their capacity as member of the World Health Organization’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board in their capacities as agents of NIAID and Conspiring Associates mandated that “the United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.”

On or about January 21, 2020, the U.S. reported its first case of coronavirus in Washington thought to be linked to what foreign sources had described as a “new” coronavirus.

On January 31, 2020, HHS Secretary Alex M. Azar II, relying on information provided by foreign sources, declared a Public Health Emergency for the United States.

On February 4, 2020, the United States Food and Drug Administration granted the CDC Emergency Use Authorization for a kit to detect coronavirus infection for which they provided no public notice regarding the establishment of an Institutional Review Board “with the concurrence of a licensed physician who is a member of or consultant to the IRB and is not otherwise participating in the clinical investigation” as required under 21 C.F.R. §50.24.

On February 10, 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci and Conspiring Associates were reported to discuss the financial benefit of the public becoming more committed to supporting research on coronaviruses in the article entitled, “Fluctuating funding and flagging interest hurt coronavirus research, leaving crucial knowledge gaps.”

On contravention to established, peer-reviewed medical science, the CDC, NIAID, and Conspiring Associates promulgated a national clinical epidemiologic experiment using “social distancing” and “face mask wearing” in a healthy population without establishing any clinical trial outcomes, without empaneling an Institutional Review Board, defining “informed consent”, and without reviewing the ethics of such experiment in contravention to the Declaration of Helsinki and 21 C.F.R. §50.20 ff, and provided guidance to Governors of the 50 states of the United States to carry out said experiment without any independently considered ethical review board finding.

According to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses’ (ICTV) Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG) publication on March 2, 2020, the preliminary data suggesting that there was sufficient variation to determine this as a novel virus vs. a mutation of known coronaviruses was not based on established scientific principles but was responsive to the World Health Organization’s prior unfounded declaration of novelty of both the virus and a new disease.

There could be no independent verification of the epidemiologic models predicting dire infection and mortality rates as the underlying models and data were not published, and when sought, were reportedly corrupted so as to make their examination impossible.

In violation of State law, no medical or scientific evidence was provided to establish causal links between the SARS CoV-2 and the symptoms of COVID-19 relying instead on foreign government hearsay and conjecture to conflate association with causation.

Based on the recommendation of the CDC, NIAID and the Conspiring Associates, no State official reviewed for accuracy or veracity any of the causal statements made in the Declaration of Emergency which contain false, misleading, and terror inducing statements.

In violation of well-established legal precedent from Jew Ho v. Williamson, 103 F. 10, 26 (C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900) and subsequent public health law, arbitrary and capricious rules were insinuated on part of the population that were not applied generally resulting in the unlawful confinement of a healthy population with no basis in science.

The CDC and its affiliated organizations have routinely conflated infection endpoints from RT-PCR and serology.

Have repeatedly reported data from flawed or unsubstantiated models projecting morbidity and mortality data for the inducement of terror in the general population in violation of §802 of the Patriot Act’s prohibition of Domestic Terrorism and, through this action, have sought to coerce a population and influence a government.

Media is used to program public.

(Fauci says he doesn’t need a covid test because he is healthy)


Protocols for Californians ignore Germ Theory being a theory, Gain of Function, Duel Use Research (sensitive material sold to highest bidder), contagion theory being a theory, A World Without Risk, Event 201, the Georgia Guidestones, the Rockefeller Papers, and more.




8 (Rainforest in Your Kitchen)








No comments:

Post a Comment