My immediate boss told me to be at my job site following all C*VID-19 protocol or get a medical reason to not attend work. I opted for no paid leave of absence since I am healthy and it is a religious reason I cannot follow Satanic protocols.
Now, I am writing to the head of the whole operation.
Dear
Mr. .....:
As
this C@VID-19 experiment on humanity moves onto(job site), I am writing to
inform you that I am opting out of all experiments associated with it and would
like to not be discriminated against for opting out, especially since a health
officer has no right to take possession of my body.1 Hello. I am Paget, a sign language interpreter for
(job site) with a PhD in a branch of theology. I currently work at (specific site/department) where I was informed that I have to follow COV*D-19 protocol
in order to enter (site). I opt out of
this experiment mainly for religious reasons, so I cannot do this. Further,
I would like to receive regular pay through to the end of (time period) when
I will retire. For these last few
months, I can enter (site) while opting out of all experimental C*VID-19
protocols (requirements), stay on Zoom from my home with (group), or other
recommendations we could brainstorm. Please
work with me to decide what is best for the experiment itself (Microsoft and company)
alongside the staffs’ psyches, because they do not know this is
an experiment.
I
understand I am most likely catching you off guard. Unlike most, I have been a student of Antoine
Béchamp, Aajonus Vonderplanitz, and Leonard Horwitz,
to name a few. I have also researched engineered
viruses and government activities associated with pharmaceutical companies (and
their scripts2) for decades and quite naturally see the experiment
for what it is. I am familiar with what
are called exosomes, Dual Use Research, and Gain of Function. Please, bear with me as I describe my stance
in detail, for I need you to fully understand that I am consciously opting out
of this experiment, but wish to work through to the end of the (time period).
I am opting out of daily temperature checks, mask-wearing, physically
distancing myself from humans, excessive hand washing or sanitizing, the weekly
“c*vid tests,” and the dawning of the social credit system: the QR Code. These are all experiments promulgated by the
Department of Health and Human Services which is supported by the Center for
Disease Control (CDC), which is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation.3 They have no institutional review board
authorization, which means they are in
violation of legislation. (For this
reason, unbeknownst to the public, people can opt out of being quarantined, as
well.) But most of all for me, covert
human experimentation is against Natural Law.
Here is some information on how this is an
experiment. The private for-profit corporation known as
the CDC sought, filed, and received a patent on April 25, 2003 which made the
identification, the detection, and detection kits for coronavirus not available
to the general population. By filing that patent, they made it impossible for
the public health interests to be served. In 2007, they extended their patent
filing to actually patent the virus, which is against 35 US Code section 101.
The reason I mention this is that testing could have been going on with
so-called sick people for years. Testing
healthy people now is inappropriate, especially in light of this information.
In 2013-2018 they worked to use international
sources to take the research on Gain of Function offshore, because it had been
determined (by the National Institute of Health in 2013) to be unethical. They
decided to work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology so they could get around
the ethical and legal implications of the work being done here in the US. They did that willfully so that in September
2019 in the publication World at Risk from the World Health
Organization, Dr. Anthony Fauci and the members of the committee actually
affiliated with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, making a recommendation
that a respiratory based pathogen simulation must be run. With no institutional review board review,
with no independent physician certifying that their actions were legal, they
avoided the exclusions of Section 50.24 of the 21 Code of Regulations. Meaning, in this instance, they cannot
experiment on us, because there has been no institutional review board. There
is no independent doctor.4 This
so-called pandemic is the simulation Fauci recommended!
I opt out of the experiment of
having my body zapped by a thermometer daily.
Time will tell what daily micro-doses of radiation will do to pineal
glands, but I prefer mine as it is. Yes,
I could use a digital thermometer, but I also do not approve of the invasion of
privacy related to temperature-taking, nor to regular folks practicing medicine
without a license through diagnosing me through that temperature. If I was the person reading the thermometer, I
would know the cycles of the females because I know how high progesterone and
high estrogen look on a thermometer. You
would not have known that I have that ability and knowledge to diagnose through
temperature had I not told you. We can
only wonder what other temperature readers know that will be an invasion of
privacy for the person having their temperature read. Alongside this, if I have an infection on my
leg that is being treated, I may still show a temperature of 100.1. For me to be sent home with the differential
diagnosis of “sick and infectious” is someone practicing medicine without a
license against CA penal code § 2052. In the case of an infection currently being
treated, this may be a normal temperature.
I am uncomfortable having my temperature taken daily for all of these
points.
Testing healthy humans
and weekly at that has never been done before.
Testing healthy people
for a problem is like giving healthy people the pertussis swab down the throat
on a weekly basis. I opt out of this
mistreatment, this experiment on the heathy!
Further, the swabs
used in both the PCR and rapid antigen tests are sterilized using ethylene
oxide, which was classified as a carcinogen, a cancer-causing agent in 2016.5
Even the maker of the PCR said it must
not be used as a test. Commercial
scientists are not searching for a “covid,” they are identifying pieces of DNA
and RNA that have occurred within the life of that body and cannot say
definitively what it means.
Depending on how many cycles it is spun, results will vary. I would NEVER allow a swab to be placed in my
nose, but I do not wish to spit into a vial weekly when I know it proves
nothing. Speaking of the swab, they
place the same one up both nostrils, potentially exposing the other side to
what the first side may be experiencing, bacterial for example.
Wearing a mask goes against my
religious beliefs. Muslim women wear it,
and I am not Muslim.6 It is also a Satanic initiation ritual. Further, slaves are made to wear them. Natural Law does not request me to hide my
face nor deny myself breath of life. Man
is demanding that I be subservient to him over Natural Law. Further, I am a researcher and have found no
proof of the safety in this. Dr. Scott Atlas
recently said that there is no evidence that a mask mandate stropped the spread
of cov*d. Dr. Sunetra Gupta also said that it is difficult
to see logically how it would work.7 Oxygen is a vitally important component to my
daily healthcare, and I am not willing to sacrifice it for an experiment where
healthy humans wear masks for extended lengths of time.
Humans thrive through microbiome swapping which occurs daily through our
interactions with each other. It is
homicide to our microflora to be isolated from one another. By 1992, authors such as Martin Teitel were
sounding the alarm that biological diversity was stopping at an alarming
rate. Humans were once enjoying huge
varieties of apples, for instance, and since 1900, we have lost 86% (6,ooo
varieties) and 30,000 strands of Indian rice were only 10 in the 1990’s. In the past, our systems and gut flora were
primed with each meal we took. The human
is now negatively affected the same as our plants and animals: our flora is
lacking genetic diversity this last year.
Genetic uniformity ensures species decline. In 2020, too many humans were locked up for
one year and their microbiome has suffered greatly through lack of genetic
diversity through lack of microbiome swapping.
This experiment of humans avoiding each other worldwide has never
occurred before; though, those educated in genetic diversity already know
what the outcome is to be through beneficial bacteria’s lack of mingling.8
Excessively washing or sanitizing
the hands may lead to detrimental decline of the supportive microorganisms that
protect the skin and therefore the body, as well as cause cracks and dry
skin. Because of this, I also
consciously avoid products such as hand sanitizer as part of my health regime. The C8VID-19 experiment includes healthy
individuals excessively cleaning, and I opt out of this.
Many know I do not bring my cell
phone with me when I leave the house due to taking a stand against the social
credit system, which is dawning on humanity now with this QR Code. Being tracked by AI is against my religion as
I answer to a different higher power. QR
Code compliance is an experiment around bringing humanity onto the social
credit system, and I opt out of this.
Please understand that when I heard about
all this experimentation to come to my job site, I elected to retire in June
and go quietly into the night. But then
I was ordered back on site mid-April.
Now, I feel I have to say something.
I can see the few options I stated at the beginning and am open to
further suggestions. I know this has been a lengthy letter, but the time has
come for me to speak. If you have any further questions,
please let me know. Will
it be best for me to enter my (site) without being held to any of the
experiment protocols or do you wish for me to work from Zoom? Is there another option we may explore? Being that this C&VID-19 is a provable
experiment in and of itself, I do not think it fair to ask me to retire before
June nor to take an unpaid leave of absence. If I have failed to prove this is an
experiment, then please show me past experiments that proved weekly testing,
temperature taking, mask-wearing, physically distancing humans from each other
has been played out with healthy individuals before, proving safety, necessity,
and effectiveness, because I have found none.
I love that (you do this and that). And support to those experiencing (this and that). That is awesome.
Thank-you for what you do for us. Now, I
am asking for your support so that I may continuing assisting my (team) until
the end of the (timeframe). Thank-you.
Bright Day Thoughts,
Paget Hillebrand, PhD
1https://www.marshall.edu/ori/nuremberg-code-directives-for-human-experimentation/
2Pandemic
terms such as asynchronistic learning, tele-education, and tele-medicine were
mentioned in a NASA paper published from 2001-2007, which proves this
experience was planned.
https://archive.org/details/FutureStrategicIssuesFutureWarfareCirca2025/mode/2up
Please
notice names such as John Hopkins that are affiliated with every part of this
experiment, making it a conflict of interest.
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/Center-projects/completed-projects/spars-pandemic-scenario.html
Notice
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, WHO, and more that we have seen all
through this experiment.
https://www.menshealth.com/health/a31811652/coronavirus-pandemic-government-simulation-crimson-contagion/
If you
watch the full Event 201, you will see familiar faces and hear terms such as “The
new norm.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoLw-Q8X174
https://stopbsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/The-Annotated-Rockefeller-Foundation-Lockstep-2010.pdf
CA ESA
Section 8558b states that a state of emergency can only be called if the threat
overwhelms the current resources of the state.
“There is no threat of an epidemic that overwhelms the resources of the
state, and therefore, according to the Emergency Services Act, section 8558b,
there are no grounds for a State of the Emergency,” says Peggy Hall.
3 https://projectspeak.net/cdc-foundation-funded-by-the-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation
4 CFR Section 50.20–No
investigator may involve a human being as a subject in research covered by
these regulations unless the investigator has obtained the legally effective
informed consent of the subject or the subject’s legally authorized
representative.
April 25, 2003, the CDC sought
to patent the “Coronavirus Isolated from Humans” in violation of 35 U.S.C. §101
which prohibits patenting nature.
In addition to their attempt to
patent the coronavirus associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
(SARS), they received patent rights to the detection and the manufacturing of a
kit to measure fragments of the virus and their awarded claims were granted on
August 17, 2010 in U.S. Patent 7,776,521 (the “Patent”).
CDC, NIAID and their Conspiring
Associates variously conducted descriptive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and Gain
of Function (engineered virus made to be more pathogenic and contagious)
research on coronavirus and such research would have required the use or
infringement of the Patent at U.S. taxpayer expense in various grants
including, but not limited to, U19 AI109761; R01 AI 108197; R01 AI132178; P30
DK065988; U19 AI109680, and other grants.
In September of 2019, Dr.
Anthony Fauci of the NIAID and Dr. Chris Elias, President, Global Development
Program for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, USA in their capacity as
member of the World Health Organization’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board
in their capacities as agents of NIAID and Conspiring Associates mandated that
“the United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training
and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of
a lethal respiratory pathogen.”
On or about January 21, 2020,
the U.S. reported its first case of coronavirus in Washington thought to be
linked to what foreign sources had described as a “new” coronavirus.
On January 31, 2020, HHS
Secretary Alex M. Azar II, relying on information provided by foreign sources,
declared a Public Health Emergency for the United States.
On February 4, 2020, the United
States Food and Drug Administration granted the CDC Emergency Use Authorization
for a kit to detect coronavirus infection for which they provided no public
notice regarding the establishment of an Institutional Review Board “with the
concurrence of a licensed physician who is a member of or consultant to the IRB
and is not otherwise participating in the clinical investigation” as required
under 21 C.F.R. §50.24.
On February 10, 2020, Dr.
Anthony Fauci and Conspiring Associates were reported to discuss the financial
benefit of the public becoming more committed to supporting research on
coronaviruses in the article entitled, “Fluctuating funding and flagging
interest hurt coronavirus research, leaving crucial knowledge gaps.”
On contravention to established,
peer-reviewed medical science, the CDC, NIAID, and Conspiring Associates
promulgated a national clinical epidemiologic experiment using “social
distancing” and “face mask wearing” in a healthy population without
establishing any clinical trial outcomes, without empaneling an Institutional
Review Board, defining “informed consent”, and without reviewing the ethics of
such experiment in contravention to the Declaration of Helsinki and 21 C.F.R.
§50.20 ff, and provided guidance to Governors of the 50 states of the United
States to carry out said experiment without any independently considered
ethical review board finding.
According to the International
Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses’ (ICTV) Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG)
publication on March 2, 2020, the preliminary data suggesting that there was
sufficient variation to determine this as a novel virus vs. a mutation of known
coronaviruses was not based on established scientific principles but was
responsive to the World Health Organization’s prior unfounded declaration of
novelty of both the virus and a new disease.
There could be no independent
verification of the epidemiologic models predicting dire infection and
mortality rates as the underlying models and data were not published, and when
sought, were reportedly corrupted so as to make their examination impossible.
In violation of State law, no
medical or scientific evidence was provided to establish causal links between
the SARS CoV-2 and the symptoms of COVID-19 relying instead on foreign
government hearsay and conjecture to conflate association with causation.
Based on the recommendation of
the CDC, NIAID and the Conspiring Associates, no State official reviewed for
accuracy or veracity any of the causal statements made in the Declaration of
Emergency which contain false, misleading, and terror inducing statements.
In violation of well-established
legal precedent from Jew Ho v. Williamson, 103 F. 10, 26 (C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900)
and subsequent public health law, arbitrary and capricious rules were
insinuated on part of the population that were not applied generally resulting
in the unlawful confinement of a healthy population with no basis in science.
The CDC and its affiliated
organizations have routinely conflated infection endpoints from RT-PCR and
serology.
Have repeatedly reported data
from flawed or unsubstantiated models projecting morbidity and mortality data
for the inducement of terror in the general population in violation of §802 of
the Patriot Act’s prohibition of Domestic Terrorism and, through this action, have
sought to coerce a population and influence a government.
https://archive.org/details/FutureStrategicIssuesFutureWarfareCirca2025/mode/2up
Media is
used to program public.
https://www.facebook.com/REALfarmacyCOM/videos/252334662344721/
https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/15/politics/anthony-fauci-coronavirus-test/index.html
(Fauci says he doesn’t need a
covid test because he is healthy)
Protocols for Californians
ignore Germ Theory being a theory, Gain of Function, Duel Use Research
(sensitive material sold to highest bidder), contagion theory being a theory, A
World Without Risk, Event 201, the Georgia Guidestones, the Rockefeller Papers,
and more.
5https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causesprevention/risk/substances/ethylene-oxide;
https://www.epa.gov/hazardous-air-pollutants-ethylene-oxide/frequent-questions-health-information-about-ethylene-oxide#carcinogen
6https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2014/12/18/muslim-women-sue-in-us-courts-for-right-to-wear-islamic-garb-on-the-job/
https://www.aclu.org/cases/medina-v-county-san-bernardino?redirect=religion-belief_womens-rights/medina-v-county-san-bernardino
7 https://thefederalist.com/2021/03/18/one-of-the-lockdowns-greatest-casualties-could-be-science/
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/scott-atlas-shoots-down-bidens-claim-that-no-serious-doc-agrees-coronavirus-restrictions-should-be-loosened
https://theredelephants.com/the-science-is-settled-lockdowns-are-more-deadly-than-the-virus-and-masks-dont-work/
8https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=30663874117&searchurl=ds%3D20%26kn%3Drain%2Bforest%2Bin%2Byour%2Bkitchen%2Bteitel%26sortby%3D17&cm_sp=snippet-_-srp1-_-title1
(Rainforest in Your Kitchen)
