Justice for All

I’m beginning to think that Lady Justice is blindfolded, because the only way the public can find justice is to not look for it outside of imagination. Unsafe dental care, mandatory vaccinations, and forced cancer treatments, how can they support justice for all?

Why can only the rich have access to safe dental care, for instance?  Oh, you think the average dentist is safe?  I have seen amalgam fillings in three and four-year-olds' teeth recently, and my daughter's dentist was still putting amalgam into children’s teeth up until a few years ago.  Fluoride is in the paste used at cleanings as well as the fluoride treatments themselves.  The plastic used in sealants and such is not safe.  The posts of some root canals are made out of mercury.  A holistic biological dentist uses top rate materials as well as ozone.  These dentists cost a fortune and patients have to pay up front, their insurance may pay a little back to the patient at a later date.  Why are unsafe practices permitted in regular dentistry?  Is this justice for all?

H.R. 2232 and SB 277 are proof of the tyrannical legislation that the powers that be would have in place.  The United States government wants to strip parents of their medical rights over their children.  They are actually mandating vaccines to be given to children and babies when no-one has ever tested a multiple dose vaccine being given at one time with a whole bunch of single doses.  Not only that, the only legislation that I know of put into place to limit thimerosal levels in vaccines, is AB 2943.  Unfortunately, Article 9: 124172c of this law allows an exemption to the law.  So whereas parents are not permitted to exempt their children from vaccines in some places, legislation that was put into place in order to protect those receiving vaccinations, can be exempted by increasing thimerosal levels.  Also, let’s point out that this law, AB 2943, is only supposed to protect pregnant women and children under three years of age.  If your children are over three, there is no legislation of which I am aware, to protect them against high levels of thimerosal poisoning.  Further, there exists no article or section to AB 2943 stating that it must be disclosed to parents that the vile of vaccine that a child is about to receive has high thimerosal levels in it, due to an exemption.   Is it justice for all when the government can mandate heavy metal poisoning?

In 1930, Royal Rife proved that when the healthy environment of the body changes dis-ease may follow.  Likewise, he showed how to re-establish a healthy environment as some did before him and many have done since him.  Yet, in spite of all the evidence about cancer’s true genesis, in about 1939, the US government decided to mandate three treatments for cancer: surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation.  Public Health and Safety Code 1707.1 ensures the same for Californians specifically, just in case someone overlooks the federal law.  This makes it difficult for someone who can assist you in balancing dis-ease in your body, specifically from advertising that this practitioner may heal your cancer.  It also means that if a seventeen-year-old researches (reads and interviews people) and decides on a course of action to improve his or her health and rid his or her body of cancer, the government can take the child away from his or her parents and force the patient to undergo surgery, chemotherapy, and or radiation against the will of the whole family.  Legislation is put into place to line the pockets of pharmecuetical companies as well as to ruin the health of citizens.  Where is the justice for all when the government gets to decide about your health decisions when they go against yours?

If people choose not to research and to blindly follow the advice of their doctors, they may very well accept dental amalgam and fluoride treatments, vaccinations to the schedule, and surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation for the supposed treatment of cancer.  Are Americans of 2015 really willing to accept poisons to be legislated, though?  If choice for citizens is gone, yet groups like the American Academy of Pediatrics, the California Academy of Family Physicians, and the California Immunization Coalition are allowed to receive exemptions to legislation meant to protect the public, where is the justice for all in that?

 

http://www.immunize.org/laws/

http://www.activistpost.com/2011/08/california-to-make-it-felony-for-mds-to.html

http://www.miracleii-4u.com/cancer-treatment-laws.htm

 

The law is missing from public record: 1707.1 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.html/hsc_table_of_contents.html

 

Job Outlook

Thanks to SB 277 here in California and wonderful legislation to come to you soon, there are a few jobs that have a great outlook.

·         School Bus Divers Wanted: someone needs to cart the soon to be 85% plus public school population to and from school.  Special Education kids get driven to schools.

·         Special Education Assistants.

·         Nurses to be one on one with some children while at schools.

·         Sign Language Interpreters.

·         Speech Therapists.

·         Fake Vaccination Card Makers.  Man, this just might be the most lucrative of them all!

The Sending Kids Off to School Playbook

Legislation is being signed into law faster than parents can keep up.  Here’s what you need to do:

Write a letter stating that (child’s name) is not to be given any medical procedures, especially vaccinations, without the parent’s consent.  This child is also not to be pulled out of classes for any talks on medical procedures, especially related to vaccinations, without the parent’s consent.

Any attempt to do so without the signed consent from the parent will result in legal action against the school and the individuals involved.

·         The parents write one and sign it.

·         The child’s doctor (and all health care professionals) sign(s) one written by you from their point of view.  If convincing is required, the parent stresses how if all procedures come from their office, then records are up to date and accurate.

·         A lawyer signs a letter written from their point of view.

·         The child signs a letter written from their point of view.  No matter their age.  You have to cover this base.  Children who are considered too young to vote, to drink, to have sex, and to die for their country, are old enough to sign a lot of consent forms.  You HAVE to have this letter on file.

Naturally, you keep copies of these signed letters.

Mr. Chaplin's Tirade on Vaccines

Arthur Chaplin recently went off with verbal diarrhea at Jim Carrey, because Mr. Carrey spoke his mind about SB 277, California’s new law exempting non-special education kids from public schools if they are not vaccinated.  Mr. Chaplin also resorts to name calling the anti-vaxxers, making himself look extremely ignorant.  What it’s actually showing us is that the propaganda campaign to discredit true researchers, who actually pay attention to the research on vaccines more than those who are pro-vaccination, is still in full swing.  They can’t even succeed in  stripping citizens of their rights without gloating.

It’s interesting that the first line in Mr. Chaplin’s article talks about the Disneyland measles (and few cases since) as an epidemic when the true epidemic is autism in this country.  Being completely misleading, Chaplin makes it sound like SB 277 went to the vote when he says that “Californians” rejected the personal beliefs exemption.  It was actually a bunch of politicians.  As far as proof that the ingredients are safe and that the vaccination schedule has been proven effective, there is no proof.  Also, the vaccination schedule keeps changing along with a lot of the vaccines.   There are thousands of families in West Virginia and in Mississippi that do want choice where vaccinations are concerned.  Many are speaking out being the voices for their vaccine injured children.  Just because legislation is set, doesn’t mean people agree with it.  Mississippi  Parents for Vaccine Rights is waiting for your Like on Facebook, Mr. Chaplin.

 Mr. Chaplin does have a point about the use of liberty sometimes placing others at risk.  Sometimes, when  someone gets a vaccination, they are exposing people to the disease of the vaccination which is sloughing off the newly vaccinated person.  That is putting healthy, innocent people at risk.  Mr. Chaplin, in his ignorance,  actually said the opposite.  He said that “liberty has to yield when using it puts others at risk,” but he was talking about parents who, in choosing not to vaccinate, endanger the lives of others.  Mr. Chaplin wants to get ridiculous, ok, let’s get ridiculous.  Each time we freely drive our cars and light up cigarettes, we place others in danger by ruining the air quality.  Each time we clean waste water with chlorine and don’t get rid of the chlorine before sending it into people’s homes, we place them at risk.  We can probably go on and on about how each of us takes liberties with doing what we want when it harms others, even ourselves.  Is being human in the 21st Century to be outlawed?

As for being critical of Carrey’s language, rather than seeing where he’s coming from, let’s make a statement to Mr. Chaplin.  If the governor was to sign it into law that you HAD TO have the medical procedure to remove your appendix, tonsils, and testicles, perhaps you would feel that your government was a very harsh, controlling authority, too.   Mr. Chaplin can’t see what Carrey was saying because Brown signed something into law that supports his own fear.  Brown has imposed his will on the people by decree.  That is a truth.   

Mr. Chaplin, democracy is one man one vote.  The US is a Republic.  It’s time you, sir, do your research!

To read the article for yourself, please click on the following link.

http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/commentary-why-jim-carrey-wrong-about-vaccines-n385321

 

 

 

Law Welcomes Sick Kids Bans Healthy Kids

Just so we’re clear, if a child has Aids, HIV, Hep B or C, or any other disease, they are allowed to attend school with your child.  If a child has lice, they are allowed to stay at school.  I called the CDC and had this confirmed.  Now, thanks to SB 277, a whole group of healthy kids are being banned from school because they are not vaccinated.  This should increase the percentage of unhealthy kids mixing with your child—and you fear unvaccinated children?  It’s strange, the things that the news can convince you to fear.  It seems to me that humans love to go on witch hunts after anything.  Remember, it was not too long ago that people tried to ban kids with Aids from schools.  As a species, we are pretty pathetic!

 

 

 

Twelve-Year-Olds Legally Decide About Vaccines

AB 499 states that a twelve-year-old is old enough to decide on the treatment and prevention of STD’s.  California's Governor Brown was pushing for all twelve-year-olds to have a certain vaccine, Gardasil. That's why he signed this ridiculous legislation into law.  Can this law be used against

SB 277?  I wonder.  If a child is twelve or older and moves to a new school district, according to

SB 277, this child has to be fully vaccinated to the current schedule in order to enter the new school.  What if she says that Brown granted her permission to decide for herself regarding the treatment and prevention of STD’s and that her choice is to bypass ALL vaccines?  Perhaps this wise twelve-year-old knows that mercury adversely effects neuro-endocrine function.  She feels that her immunity will be greater as well as her decision making processes related to potential lovers if she stays clear of vaccines.  Perhaps she feels that the best way to remain STD-free is to keep her body free of toxic, non-natural substances being injected into her system.  No, wait.  Sane arguments don't work on politicians with Agendas.

 

Most definitely, if Gardasil becomes mandatory in California, anyone over twelve should be able to use this law to opt out of succumbing to it. 

Will this argument hold up in court against SB 277?  Brown said she was old enough to decide, after all.

 

Brown Boldly Displaces Parental Rights

Governor Brown signed AB 499 into law in October 2011.  At that time, he decided that twelve-year-olds were old enough to decide what is best for them medically.  This law states that these youngsters no longer have to get permission from parents regarding STD treatment and prevention.  On June 30, 2015, Brown decided that the California government is to decide on the medical procedure of vaccinating children, overriding parents’ choices and decisions.  Odd how people chant praise for Brown in forcing kids to be vaccinated because they fear unvaccinated kids may make their kids sick, yet they don’t chant for him to ban aspartame and MSG, neuro-toxins, and they don’t ask for fast food restaurant ice to be checked for high bacterial levels.  These things WILL harm their kids.  These sheople do no research whatsoever.  They just lap up the mainstream media’s news gaining pseudo-intelligence.  Wake up.  Brown’s laws have one goal in common: to take away your right to parent your children.  This method was tried before.  Remember Carlisle?  It was an “Indian” school where Native children, who were legally stolen from their parents, were stripped of anything related to their culture.  In 2008, I met an elderly Cheyenne man.  I spoke Cheyenne better than him and I am by no means fluent.  I feel so saddened by the success of Carlisle, that I can’t even tell you.  This is happening to us now.  Governments of the world don’t want us parenting our kids.  They’ve got video games and televisions firmly in place…and laws saying they get to decide on medical procedures...not parents.