Ms. Jacey Cooper Chief Deputy Director,
Health Care Programs California Department
of Health Care Services
1501 Capitol Avenue, 6th Floor,
Sacramento, CA 95814
Dear Ms. Cooper:
On December 24, 2020, California submitted
an application requesting flexibility to provide C*VID-19 testing for children
covered under Medicaid and CHIP exclusively through the fee-for-service
delivery system for when testing was to occur in schools, effective February 1,
2021. You show every intention of having
students tested for COV*D-19 when both the rapid antigen test and the PCR have
on the label, as well as on each individually wrapped swab, that each swab was
sterilized with ethylene oxide, a cancer-causing chemical. How dare you place our
children in harm’s way.
Further,
testing healthy people for a problem is like giving healthy people the pertussis
swab down the throat on a weekly basis.
It is criminal, unnecessary, and experimental to test asymptomatic,
healthy people, but to subject these kids and staff to this chemical on a
weekly basis is unconscionable. At least
one school district in California will test all adults and children (who wish
to enter campuses of that school district) on a weekly basis, and you are not
stopping it. How can you stand back,
allowing this to happen? Code Federal Regulations,
Section 50.20 says, “No investigator may involve a human being as a subject in
research covered by these regulations unless the investigator has obtained the
legally effective informed consent of the subject or the subject’s legally
authorized representative.” These children, their parents, and the staff have
not been informed that they are participating in an experiment: an experiment
on multiple levels! Beyond this,
experimenting on living men is against Natural Law.
Even the maker of the PCR said this
process is not looking for an exact virus.
It looks for genetic debris and not even you can say how that debris got
there. (A person’s own cell may have
tried to balance itself, making a byproduct called a virus, for instance. That debris is from the immune system
working.) Show proof of your claim that
a C*VIV-19 that is natural, wild, and floating around in the air has been
isolated. Next, show proof that this
“test” can isolate that from a person and say it is there. Lastly, show proof that this test is safe and
safe on a weekly basis. If you cannot do
these three requests, then you have no right supporting the requirement that
those living, working, and attending school in California must succumb to the
COV*D-19 so-called test.
Alongside this, if you cannot show proof
of your claim that a virus known as natural, wild C*VID-19 has been isolated,
then you need to announce that there is no pandemic in California and all
associated requirements to the myth and all of those arrested or fined due to
the myth should be freed and released of all obligations associated with the
myth, in your opinion. People of California look to you as an authority on this
subject.
Here is some information on how this is an
experiment. The private for-profit corporation known as
the CDC sought, filed, and received a patent on April 25, 2003 which made the
identification, the detection, and detection kits for coronavirus not available
to the general population. They, by virtue of that act, by filing that patent,
made it impossible for the public health interests to be served. In 2007, they
extended their patent filing to actually patent the virus, which is against 35
US Code section 101. The reason I mention this is that testing could have been
going on with so-called sick people for years.
Testing healthy people now is inappropriate, especially in light of this
information.
In 2013-2018 they worked to use international
sources to take the research on Gain of Function offshore, because it had been
determined (by the National Institute of Health in 2013) to be unethical. They
decided to work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology so they could get around
the ethical and legal implications of the work being done in the US. They did that willfully so that in September
2019 in the publication World at Risk from the World Health
Organization, Dr. Anthony Fauci and the members of the committee actually
affiliated with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, making a recommendation
that a respiratory based pathogen simulation must be run. This is against Natural Law. Further, with no
institutional review board review, with no independent physician certifying
that their actions were legal, they avoided the exclusions of Section 50.24 of
the 21 Code of Regulations. Meaning, in
this instance, they cannot experiment on us, because there has been no
institutional review board. There is no independent doctor.* This so-called pandemic is the simulation Fauci
recommended! You either have not
researched or you are complicit in the crime against humanity. At any rate, now that you are aware of an
engineered virus, you know that the average person is not where the so-called
COVID-19 starts or ends.
Please publicly show proof of your claim that
there is a natural, wild virus so scientists and doctors not affiliated with
Big Pharma may have an opportunity to dispute it, or publicly remove COV*D-19
testing and other pandemic protocols from California completely. Participating in this experiment needs to be
a conscious choice. Thank-you.
In Truth Under Natural Law,
Paget Hillebrand
*April 25, 2003, the CDC sought
to patent the “Coronavirus Isolated from Humans” in violation of 35 U.S.C. §101
which prohibits patenting nature.
In addition to their attempt to
patent the coronavirus associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
(SARS), they received patent rights to the detection and the manufacturing of a
kit to measure fragments of the virus and their awarded claims were granted on
August 17, 2010 in U.S. Patent 7,776,521 (the “Patent”).
CDC, NIAID and their Conspiring
Associates variously conducted descriptive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and Gain
of Function (engineered virus made to be more pathogenic and contagious)
research on coronavirus and such research would have required the use or
infringement of the Patent at U.S. taxpayer expense in various grants
including, but not limited to, U19 AI109761; R01 AI 108197; R01 AI132178; P30
DK065988; U19 AI109680, and other grants.
In September of 2019, Dr.
Anthony Fauci of the NIAID and Dr. Chris Elias, President, Global Development
Program for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, USA in their capacity as
member of the World Health Organization’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board
in their capacities as agents of NIAID and Conspiring Associates mandated that
“the United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training
and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of
a lethal respiratory pathogen.”
On or about January 21, 2020,
the U.S. reported its first case of coronavirus in Washington thought to be
linked to what foreign sources had described as a “new” coronavirus.
On January 31, 2020, HHS
Secretary Alex M. Azar II, relying on information provided by foreign sources,
declared a Public Health Emergency for the United States.
On February 4, 2020, the United
States Food and Drug Administration granted the CDC Emergency Use Authorization
for a kit to detect coronavirus infection for which they provided no public
notice regarding the establishment of an Institutional Review Board “with the
concurrence of a licensed physician who is a member of or consultant to the IRB
and is not otherwise participating in the clinical investigation” as required
under 21 C.F.R. §50.24.
On February 10, 2020, Dr.
Anthony Fauci and Conspiring Associates were reported to discuss the financial
benefit of the public becoming more committed to supporting research on
coronaviruses in the article entitled, “Fluctuating funding and flagging
interest hurt coronavirus research, leaving crucial knowledge gaps.”
On contravention to established,
peer-reviewed medical science, the CDC, NIAID, and Conspiring Associates
promulgated a national clinical epidemiologic experiment using “social
distancing” and “face mask wearing” in a healthy population without
establishing any clinical trial outcomes, without empaneling an Institutional
Review Board, defining “informed consent”, and without reviewing the ethics of
such experiment in contravention to the Declaration of Helsinki and 21 C.F.R.
§50.20 ff, and provided guidance to Governors of the 50 states of the United
States to carry out said experiment without any independently considered
ethical review board finding.
According to the International
Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses’ (ICTV) Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG)
publication on March 2, 2020, the preliminary data suggesting that there was
sufficient variation to determine this as a novel virus vs. a mutation of known
coronaviruses was not based on established scientific principles but was
responsive to the World Health Organization’s prior unfounded declaration of
novelty of both the virus and a new disease.
There could be no independent
verification of the epidemiologic models predicting dire infection and
mortality rates as the underlying models and data were not published, and when
sought, were reportedly corrupted so as to make their examination impossible.
In violation of State law, no
medical or scientific evidence was provided to establish causal links between
the SARS CoV-2 and the symptoms of COVID-19 relying instead on foreign
government hearsay and conjecture to conflate association with causation.
Based on the recommendation of
the CDC, NIAID and the Conspiring Associates, no State official reviewed for
accuracy or veracity any of the causal statements made in the Declaration of
Emergency which contain false, misleading, and terror inducing statements.
In violation of well-established
legal precedent from Jew Ho v. Williamson, 103 F. 10, 26 (C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900)
and subsequent public health law, arbitrary and capricious rules were
insinuated on part of the population that were not applied generally resulting
in the unlawful confinement of a healthy population with no basis in science.
The CDC and its affiliated
organizations have routinely conflated infection endpoints from RT-PCR and
serology.
Have repeatedly reported data
from flawed or unsubstantiated models projecting morbidity and mortality data
for the inducement of terror in the general population in violation of §802 of
the Patriot Act’s prohibition of Domestic Terrorism and, through this action,
have sought to coerce a population and influence a government.
Protocols for Californians
ignore Germ Theory being a theory, Gain of Function, Dual Use Research
(sensitive material sold to highest bidder), contagion theory being a theory, A
World Without Risk, Event 201, the Georgia Guidestones, the Rockefeller Papers,
and more.
Dr. Barbara Ferrer
313 N. Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Dear Dr. Ferrer:
You are standing back allowing students and
adults of Los Angeles to be tested for COV*D-19 when both the rapid antigen
test and the PCR have on the label, as well as on each individually wrapped
swab, that each swab has been sterilized with ethylene oxide, a cancer-causing chemical. How dare you
place our community in harm’s way.
Further,
testing healthy people for a problem is like giving healthy people the pertussis
swab down the throat on a weekly basis.
It is criminal, unnecessary, and experimental to test asymptomatic,
healthy people, but to subject these school kids and staff to this chemical on a
weekly basis is unconscionable. At least
one school district in California will test all adults and children (who wish
to enter campuses of that school district) on a weekly basis, and you are not
stopping it. How can you stand back,
allowing this to happen? Code Federal Regulations,
Section 50.20 says, “No investigator may involve a human being as a subject in
research covered by these regulations unless the investigator has obtained the
legally effective informed consent of the subject or the subject’s legally
authorized representative.” These children, their parents, and the staff have
not been informed that they are participating in an experiment: an experiment
on multiple levels! Beyond this,
experimenting on living men is against Natural Law.
Even the maker of the PCR said this
process is not looking for an exact virus.
It looks for genetic debris and not even you can say how that debris got
there. (A person’s own cell may have
tried to balance itself, making a byproduct called a virus, for instance. That debris is from the immune system
working.) Show proof of your claim that
a COV*D-19 that is natural, wild, and floating around in the air has been
isolated. Next, show proof that this
“test” can isolate that from a person and say it is there. Lastly, show proof that this test is safe and
safe on a weekly basis. If you cannot do
these three requests, then you have no right supporting the requirement that
those living, working, and attending school in California must succumb to the
COV*D-19 so-called test.
Alongside this, if you cannot show proof
of your claim that a virus known as natural, wild C*VID-19 has been isolated,
then you need to announce that there is no pandemic in California and all
associated requirements to the myth are stopped. People of LA look to you as an authority on
this subject.
Here is some information on how this is an
experiment. The private for-profit corporation known as
the CDC sought, filed, and received a patent on April 25, 2003 which made the
identification, the detection, and detection kits for coronavirus not available
to the general population. They, by virtue of that act, by filing that patent,
made it impossible for the public health interests to be served. In 2007, they
extended their patent filing to actually patent the virus, which is against 35
US Code section 101. The reason I mention this is that testing could have been
going on with so-called sick people for years.
Testing healthy people now is inappropriate, especially in light of this
information.
In 2013-2018 they worked to use international
sources to take the research on Gain of Function offshore, because it had been
determined (by the National Institute of Health in 2013) to be unethical. They
decided to work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology so they could get around
the ethical and legal implications of the work being done in the US. They did that willfully so that in September
2019 in the publication World at Risk from the World Health
Organization, Dr. Anthony Fauci and the members of the committee actually
affiliated with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, making a recommendation
that a respiratory based pathogen simulation must be run. This is against Natural Law. Further, with no
institutional review board review, with no independent physician certifying
that their actions were legal, they avoided the exclusions of Section 50.24 of
the 21 Code of Regulations. Meaning, in
this instance, they cannot experiment on us, because there has been no
institutional review board. There is no independent doctor.* This so-called pandemic is the simulation Fauci
recommended! You either have not
researched or you are complicit in the crime against humanity. At any rate, now that you are aware of an
engineered virus, you know that the average person is not where the so-called
COV^D-19 starts or ends.
Please publicly show proof of your claim that
there is a natural, wild virus so scientists and doctors not affiliated with
Big Pharma may have an opportunity to dispute it, or publicly remove C&VID-19
testing and other pandemic protocols from Los Angeles completely. Participating in this experiment needs to be
a conscious choice. Thank-you.
In Truth Under Natural Law,
Paget Hillebrand
*April 25, 2003, the CDC sought
to patent the “Coronavirus Isolated from Humans” in violation of 35 U.S.C. §101
which prohibits patenting nature.
In addition to their attempt to
patent the coronavirus associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
(SARS), they received patent rights to the detection and the manufacturing of a
kit to measure fragments of the virus and their awarded claims were granted on
August 17, 2010 in U.S. Patent 7,776,521 (the “Patent”).
CDC, NIAID and their Conspiring
Associates variously conducted descriptive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and Gain
of Function (engineered virus made to be more pathogenic and contagious)
research on coronavirus and such research would have required the use or
infringement of the Patent at U.S. taxpayer expense in various grants
including, but not limited to, U19 AI109761; R01 AI 108197; R01 AI132178; P30
DK065988; U19 AI109680, and other grants.
In September of 2019, Dr.
Anthony Fauci of the NIAID and Dr. Chris Elias, President, Global Development
Program for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, USA in their capacity as
member of the World Health Organization’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board
in their capacities as agents of NIAID and Conspiring Associates mandated that
“the United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training
and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of
a lethal respiratory pathogen.”
On or about January 21, 2020,
the U.S. reported its first case of coronavirus in Washington thought to be
linked to what foreign sources had described as a “new” coronavirus.
On January 31, 2020, HHS
Secretary Alex M. Azar II, relying on information provided by foreign sources,
declared a Public Health Emergency for the United States.
On February 4, 2020, the United
States Food and Drug Administration granted the CDC Emergency Use Authorization
for a kit to detect coronavirus infection for which they provided no public
notice regarding the establishment of an Institutional Review Board “with the
concurrence of a licensed physician who is a member of or consultant to the IRB
and is not otherwise participating in the clinical investigation” as required
under 21 C.F.R. §50.24.
On February 10, 2020, Dr.
Anthony Fauci and Conspiring Associates were reported to discuss the financial
benefit of the public becoming more committed to supporting research on
coronaviruses in the article entitled, “Fluctuating funding and flagging
interest hurt coronavirus research, leaving crucial knowledge gaps.”
On contravention to established,
peer-reviewed medical science, the CDC, NIAID, and Conspiring Associates
promulgated a national clinical epidemiologic experiment using “social
distancing” and “face mask wearing” in a healthy population without
establishing any clinical trial outcomes, without empaneling an Institutional
Review Board, defining “informed consent”, and without reviewing the ethics of
such experiment in contravention to the Declaration of Helsinki and 21 C.F.R.
§50.20 ff, and provided guidance to Governors of the 50 states of the United
States to carry out said experiment without any independently considered
ethical review board finding.
According to the International
Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses’ (ICTV) Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG)
publication on March 2, 2020, the preliminary data suggesting that there was
sufficient variation to determine this as a novel virus vs. a mutation of known
coronaviruses was not based on established scientific principles but was
responsive to the World Health Organization’s prior unfounded declaration of
novelty of both the virus and a new disease.
There could be no independent
verification of the epidemiologic models predicting dire infection and
mortality rates as the underlying models and data were not published, and when
sought, were reportedly corrupted so as to make their examination impossible.
In violation of State law, no
medical or scientific evidence was provided to establish causal links between
the SARS CoV-2 and the symptoms of COVID-19 relying instead on foreign
government hearsay and conjecture to conflate association with causation.
Based on the recommendation of
the CDC, NIAID and the Conspiring Associates, no State official reviewed for
accuracy or veracity any of the causal statements made in the Declaration of
Emergency which contain false, misleading, and terror inducing statements.
In violation of well-established
legal precedent from Jew Ho v. Williamson, 103 F. 10, 26 (C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900)
and subsequent public health law, arbitrary and capricious rules were
insinuated on part of the population that were not applied generally resulting
in the unlawful confinement of a healthy population with no basis in science.
The CDC and its affiliated
organizations have routinely conflated infection endpoints from RT-PCR and
serology.
Have repeatedly reported data
from flawed or unsubstantiated models projecting morbidity and mortality data
for the inducement of terror in the general population in violation of §802 of
the Patriot Act’s prohibition of Domestic Terrorism and, through this action,
have sought to coerce a population and influence a government.
Protocols for Californians
ignore Germ Theory being a theory, Gain of Function, Dual Use Research
(sensitive material sold to highest bidder), contagion theory being a theory, A
World Without Risk, Event 201, the Georgia Guidestones, the Rockefeller Papers,
and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment